News

    Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation

    By Gradum Team11 min read
    Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation

    ISO/IEC 27701 Zero-to-Hero: The Ultimate PIMS Implementation Guide


    1. Executive Summary (The What & The Who)

    What it is (in plain English)
    ISO/IEC 27701 is the international standard for building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS).
    Think of it as a practical “operating system” for privacy: it turns principles from GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, POPIA and similar laws into:

    • Concrete roles and responsibilities
    • Repeatable processes
    • Auditable evidence that you actually do what your policies say

    It extends the familiar ISO management-system model (Plan–Do–Check–Act) to privacy:

    • Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance, improvement
    • Annex A/B: detailed privacy controls for PII controllers and PII processors

    ISO/IEC 27701 is designed as an extension to ISO/IEC 27001 (your ISMS). Certification to ISO/IEC 27701 requires that you also maintain an ISO/IEC 27001 certification, as the PIMS requirements build directly upon the ISMS structure. You must confirm with your chosen certification body how they structure the integrated audit.

    Who should care

    You should be implementing ISO/IEC 27701 if:

    • You process significant volumes of personally identifiable information (PII) or “personal data”
    • You are a B2B/SaaS, cloud, fintech, health, HR/payroll, gov/public or any data‑intensive organisation
    • Your customers or regulators ask for privacy assurance, not just “we follow GDPR”
    • You already run an ISO 27001 ISMS and want an efficient privacy layer
    • You act as a processor for clients (e.g. SaaS, BPO, MSP) and need to prove you’re safe to trust

    Stakeholders who will use this guide:

    • C‑suite / Board: risk, governance and budget decisions
    • DPO / Privacy Lead / CISO: programme owners
    • Compliance, Legal, Risk, IT, Product, HR, Procurement: execution teams
    • Vendor Management & Sales: answering privacy questionnaires and RFPs

    2. The “Why” (Risk & Reward)

    2.1 Risk: What happens if you don’t get this right?

    ISO/IEC 27701 itself is not a law, but it is designed to operationalise legal duties. Poor privacy governance exposes you to:

    Regulatory and legal exposure

    • GDPR‑style fines (up to 4% global turnover or local equivalents)
    • Orders to stop processing, delete data, or change services
    • Class actions and litigation, especially after breaches or mishandled data‑subject requests (DSARs)

    Commercial and contractual risk

    • Being excluded from RFPs when buyers demand ISO 27001+27701 or equivalent privacy assurance
    • Lost deals due to weak answers in security/privacy questionnaires
    • Liability for failures by your processors/sub‑processors if you can’t show proper oversight

    Operational and incident risk

    • Larger, harder‑to‑contain breaches because data inventories, retention and vendor controls are weak
    • Chaotic DSAR handling that ties up senior staff and creates complaint exposure
    • Inability to show evidence when a regulator or major customer asks, undermining trust instantly

    2.2 Reward: Why ISO/IEC 27701 is a smart strategic move

    Stronger market position

    • Recognised, auditable proof that your privacy controls are not just on paper
    • Faster sales cycles because you can hand over a certificate, SoA and evidence pack
    • Easier cross‑border business, as Annex mappings help show alignment to GDPR and other regimes

    Operational clarity and efficiency

    • A single, governed PIMS instead of scattered, ad‑hoc “GDPR projects” in each department
    • Data inventories, retention rules, and DSAR workflows that are repeatable and measurable
    • Integrated audits and controls if you already have ISO 27001, cutting overhead

    Risk reduction with evidence

    • Structured privacy risk assessment including harm to individuals, not just corporate loss
    • Documented decisions, DPIAs, and contracts that stand up in investigations
    • Annual surveillance audits that keep the programme alive, not shelf‑ware

    In short: ISO/IEC 27701 turns privacy from a compliance headache into a governed capability that protects revenue, reputation, and regulatory position.


    3. The Implementation Cookbook (Zero to Hero in Four Phases)

    Design your ISO/IEC 27701 journey as a phased programme, not a single project. Below is a pragmatic roadmap you can adopt or adapt.

    Phase 1 – Scope, Roles & Gap Analysis (“Discover”)

    Goal: Understand where you are, what’s in scope, and what’s missing.

    1.1 Establish governance and sponsorship

    • Appoint a senior Privacy Policy Owner (often DPO, CISO or GC) with board backing
    • Form a PIMS Steering Committee including:
      • Privacy/DPO
      • Information Security
      • Legal/Compliance
      • IT/Engineering
      • HR
      • Procurement/Vendor Management
      • Product / Operations
    • Agree PIMS objectives and success metrics (e.g. DSAR SLA, vendor coverage, incident trends)

    1.2 Define PIMS context and scope (Clause 4)

    • Identify:
      • Business units and locations
      • Products/services that handle PII
      • Supporting systems (HR, CRM, ticketing, cloud platforms)
    • Decide if PIMS will initially cover:
      • Entire organisation, or
      • Specific high‑risk lines of business / regions
    • Document this in a formal PIMS Scope Statement.

    1.3 Map controller / processor roles early

    Per Learning 35, role clarity is non‑negotiable.

    • For each processing activity in your business:
      • Are you a PII Controller, PII Processor, or Joint Controller?
    • Capture this in a role matrix; it will drive:
      • Which Annex A (controller) and Annex B (processor) controls apply
      • Your contractual positions with customers and vendors

    1.4 Build a PII inventory and data‑flow maps

    • Create or refine a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA):
      • Purposes
      • Categories of data and data subjects
      • Legal basis
      • Recipients and vendors
      • Countries/regions
      • Retention rules
    • Diagram high‑risk data flows, including cross‑border transfers and subprocessors.

    1.5 Perform a PIMS gap analysis

    Using Annex F and existing ISO 27001 assets (Learning 6, 23):

    • Compare current controls against:
      • Clauses 4–10 (management system)
      • Annex A (controllers)
      • Annex B (processors)
    • Use categories:
      • In place / adequate
      • Partially in place
      • Missing / not applicable
    • Produce a Gap Analysis Report with:
      • Risks
      • Recommended actions
      • Quick wins vs. major projects

    1.6 Extend your risk assessment

    • Integrate privacy risk into your risk methodology (Learning 11, 41):
      • Include impact on individuals (identity theft, discrimination, financial loss, loss of confidentiality)
      • Retain likelihood/impact scoring (e.g. 1–5) and risk thresholds
    • Output: a PIMS Risk Assessment & Treatment Plan that feeds your SoA.

    Phase 2 – Design & Document the PIMS (“Plan”)

    Goal: Turn the analysis into a concrete governance and control design.

    2.1 Build or update your PIMS policy framework

    Key documents (all must be controlled and approved):

    • Privacy Policy (internal and external versions)
    • PIMS Manual or Framework Document
    • RoPA standard and templates
    • DSAR procedure (intake, verification, search, response, timelines)
    • DPIA procedure and templates
    • Data retention & deletion policy
    • Vendor and sub‑processor management procedure
    • Breach / incident response procedure (with privacy escalation and regulatory notification)
    • Cross‑border transfer procedure

    Ensure they explicitly link to ISO/IEC 27701 clauses and roles.

    2.2 Define roles and responsibilities

    • Name:
      • DPO / Privacy Lead
      • PIMS Manager / Coordinator
      • Data Owners (by system or process)
      • DSAR handlers
      • Incident response leads
      • Vendor risk owners
    • Document responsibilities in:
      • RACI matrices
      • Job descriptions
      • Committee terms of reference

    2.3 Develop your PIMS Statement of Applicability (SoA)

    Per Learning 22, 23, 36:

    • List all relevant Annex A and B controls
    • For each control:
      • Applicability (Y/N)
      • Role (controller / processor / both)
      • Implementation status
      • Justification for exclusions
      • Linked risks and evidence references

    This SoA will be central to audits and must be kept live.

    2.4 Plan metrics and monitoring

    Choose a minimal but meaningful set of privacy KPIs, for example:

    • % of DSARs closed within statutory and internal SLAs
    • and severity of privacy incidents (and % reportable)

    • % of in‑scope vendors with signed DPAs and assessed privacy risk
    • Training completion rates by role
    • of DPIAs for new high‑risk projects

    Define:

    • Data sources (ticketing, SIEM, vendor tools)
    • Owners
    • Reporting cadence (for management review – Learning 1, 31)

    Phase 3 – Implement & Embed Controls (“Do”)

    Goal: Make privacy part of everyday operations, with traceable evidence.

    3.1 Embed privacy in security and IT operations

    Leverage your ISMS (Learning 6, 28, 30):

    • Align access control, logging, backup, and vulnerability management with PII risks
    • Ensure encryption, pseudonymisation, and secure deletion cover PII repositories
    • Include privacy checks in:
      • Change management gates
      • SDLC / DevSecOps pipelines
      • New system onboarding

    3.2 Stand up DSAR and DPIA operations

    • Configure a central intake channel (web form, email, portal) for DSARs
    • Implement workflow in a case‑management tool (or well‑governed ticketing system):
      • Triage and identity verification
      • System searches (based on RoPA)
      • Legal review where needed
      • Response generation and secure delivery
    • Run a DSAR simulation before any audit.

    For DPIAs:

    • Define triggers (e.g. large‑scale monitoring, sensitive data, new tech)
    • Enforce DPIA checks in project initiation forms
    • Record decisions, mitigations, accepted residual risks.

    3.3 Operationalise retention and deletion

    • Translate policy into system‑level rules:
      • Database retention settings
      • Log retention
      • Data‑warehouse and analytics pipelines
    • Implement regular deletion jobs and evidence (reports, logs).
    • Handle legal holds and exceptions explicitly.

    3.4 Strengthen vendor and processor governance

    Based on Learning 14, 15, 21, 46, 50:

    • Classify vendors by privacy risk (data volume, sensitivity, processing type, geography)
    • Standardise Data Processing Agreements (DPAs):
      • Roles and purposes
      • Security requirements
      • Sub‑processor rules and approvals
      • Breach notification timelines
      • Support for DSARs and DPIAs
    • Establish ongoing monitoring:
      • Periodic reassessments
      • Review of SOC/ISO reports
      • Issue and action tracking

    3.5 Train and raise awareness

    Training is a common failure point (Learning 42, 55, 56):

    • Develop role‑based modules:
      • All staff: privacy basics and incident reporting
      • HR: employee data and DSARs
      • Product/Engineering: privacy‑by‑design, data minimisation
      • Sales/Customer Success: promises made to customers, DSAR routing
      • Procurement: DPAs and vendor due diligence
    • Record:
      • Attendance
      • Assessment results
      • Retraining dates

    These records are audit evidence.

    3.6 Tooling & automation (optional but powerful)

    Consider GRC / privacy platforms (ISMS.online, Scrut, Centraleyes, StrikeGraph, Conformio):

    • Pre‑mapped controls for ISO 27001 / 27701 / GDPR
    • Risk registers and SoA management
    • Evidence collection from cloud, HR, IdP, ticketing systems
    • DSAR, DPIA and vendor‑risk workflows

    Select tools only after defining:

    • Scope
    • Evidence sources
    • Integration requirements
    • Budget and lock‑in acceptance

    Phase 4 – Assure, Certify & Improve (“Check & Act”)

    Goal: Prove effectiveness, close gaps, and prepare for external scrutiny.

    4.1 Run internal PIMS audits

    Mandatory per Learning 3:

    • Develop an internal audit programme covering:
      • Clauses 4–10
      • Annex A / B controls as applicable
      • SoA vs. real implementation
    • Use trained internal auditors or competent external support.
    • Produce:
      • Audit plan and scope
      • Working papers and evidence samples
      • Non‑conformity reports
      • Corrective action plans

    4.2 Conduct management review

    Per Learning 1 and 31:

    • At least annually, convene top management to review:
      • Internal audit results
      • KPI trends
      • Significant incidents and complaints
      • Vendor performance
      • Resource adequacy
      • Opportunities for improvement
    • Document minutes and decisions. Auditors will ask for them.

    4.3 Engage an accredited certification body

    Per Learning 2, 10, 13, 19:

    • Shortlist bodies with:
      • Proper accreditation
      • Experience in your sector
      • Ability to run integrated ISO 27001 + 27701 audits if relevant
    • Confirm scheme details:
      • How the 27701 audit integrates with your existing 27001 cycle
      • Transition timelines if you’re on an earlier edition
    • Prepare for the standard two‑stage process:
      • Stage 1: document review (policies, SoA, RoPA, audits, management review)
      • Stage 2: implementation testing (interviews, evidence sampling, walk‑throughs)

    4.4 Address findings and move into surveillance mode

    • Fix all non‑conformities with documented corrective actions
    • Upon successful certification:
      • Plan for annual surveillance audits (Learning 4, 24)
      • Refresh risk assessments and SoA at least annually or on major change
      • Keep RoPA, DSAR logs, incident records and training evidence up‑to‑date

    Your PIMS is now live infrastructure, not a project. Treat it that way.


    4. The “First Moves” Checklist

    Do These 10 Things First

    If you did nothing else today, do these to build immediate momentum:

    1. Name an Executive Sponsor and Privacy Lead

      • Confirm who owns ISO/IEC 27701 at board/C‑suite level and who runs it day‑to‑day.
    2. Decide Your Initial Scope

      • Pick the business units, products, and regions that must be in scope in year one.
    3. Confirm Controller / Processor Roles

      • List your top 10–20 processing activities and mark each as controller, processor or both.
    4. Start a Basic RoPA / PII Inventory

      • Even a spreadsheet with purposes, systems, vendors, data types and retention is a strong start.
    5. Map Existing ISO 27001 Assets (if you have them)

      • Identify which ISMS controls, risk processes, and documents you can reuse for privacy.
    6. Identify High‑Risk Vendors and Contracts

      • Flag processors handling large volumes or sensitive PII; note where no DPA or weak privacy terms exist.
    7. Draft or Refresh Your Privacy Policy and DSAR Procedure

      • These are high‑visibility to customers and auditors; get workable drafts in place quickly.
    8. Define Your Initial Privacy KPIs

      • Choose 3–5 metrics (e.g. DSAR SLA, vendor coverage, training completion) and set ownership.
    9. Plan Internal Audit & Management Review Dates Now

      • Put them in senior calendars for the next 6–12 months; treat them as immovable.
    10. Talk to 1–2 Certification Bodies and 1 Tool Vendor

      • Validate how they handle the integrated ISO 27001 + 27701 audit, rough timelines, and whether tooling will materially cut your evidence burden.

    Execute these steps and you’ll move from “we should do something about privacy” to a concrete, board‑backed ISO/IEC 27701 programme with a credible path to certification and real risk reduction.

    5

    Top 5 Takeaways

    from ISO/IEC 27701 Guide

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Check out these Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages