23 NYCRR 500
NYDFS regulation for financial services cybersecurity
ISO 27701
International standard for privacy information management systems.
Quick Verdict
23 NYCRR 500 mandates prescriptive cybersecurity for NY financial firms with fines for breaches, while ISO 27701 offers voluntary global PIMS certification for privacy. Firms adopt 500 for compliance, 27701 for assurance and market trust.
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Annual dual CEO/CISO compliance certification
- 72-hour material incident notification requirement
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged access
- Comprehensive TPSP risk management policy
- Risk-based annual penetration testing mandate
ISO 27701
ISO/IEC 27701 Privacy Information Management
Key Features
- Extends ISO 27001 with PIMS requirements
- Separate controls for PII controllers/processors
- Annex mappings to GDPR and other frameworks
- Risk-based PDCA continuous improvement cycle
- Auditable evidence via SoA and RoPA
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) cybersecurity regulation for financial entities. This mandatory state regulation applies to Covered Entities like banks, insurers, and licensees operating in New York. Its primary purpose is protecting nonpublic information (NPI) and information systems via a risk-based approach, requiring demonstrable outcomes through governance and controls.
Key Components
- Core pillars: governance (CISO, board oversight), risk assessments, technical controls (MFA, encryption, access privileges), TPSP management, testing, and incident response.
- 14 main requirements across sections like 500.2 (Cybersecurity Program) to 500.17 (Notifications).
- Built on risk assessment (§500.9); annual certification model with five-year evidence retention.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal compliance avoids multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M). Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, builds stakeholder trust, and aligns with enterprise risk management for competitive edge in financial services.
Implementation Overview
Phased roadmap: gap analysis, asset inventory, MFA rollout, TPSP contracts, IR testing. Applies to NY-licensed financial firms (Class A enhanced). No formal certification but annual CEO/CISO filing and DFS examinations require auditable evidence. (178 words)
ISO 27701 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27701 is the international standard titled "Extension to ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 for privacy information management — Requirements and guidance." It is a certifiable framework that extends the ISO 27001 information security management system (ISMS) into a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). Its primary purpose is to help organizations manage privacy risks associated with processing personally identifiable information (PII), specifying requirements for controllers and processors using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach.
Key Components
- Management system clauses (4-10) extending ISO 27001 for privacy context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- **Annex A37 controls for PII controllers (e.g., consent, DSARs, retention).
- **Annex B24 controls for PII processors (e.g., contracts, sub-processors).
- Mappings to GDPR (Annex D), ISO 29100 (Annex C), and others.
- Certification via accredited bodies, typically as add-on to ISO 27001, with 3-year validity and annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates accountability for global privacy laws like GDPR, reducing fines and risks.
- Builds trust with customers, regulators, and supply chains.
- Integrates privacy into security governance for efficiency.
- Enables market differentiation via certification.
Implementation Overview
- Gap analysis against existing ISMS, role determination (controller/processor), risk assessment, SoA development.
- Phased: scope, policies/RoPA/DSARs, controls, audits.
- Applies to any PII-processing organization; 6-12 months typical with ISO 27001 base.
- Requires Stage 1/2 audits by certification bodies.
Key Differences
| Aspect | 23 NYCRR 500 | ISO 27701 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Prescriptive cybersecurity for financial entities | Privacy management system for PII processing |
| Industry | NY financial services (banks, insurers) | All industries handling PII globally |
| Nature | Mandatory state regulation with enforcement | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Annual pen testing, vulnerability assessments | Internal audits, management reviews, certification |
| Penalties | Multi-million fines, consent orders | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about 23 NYCRR 500 and ISO 27701
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
ISO 27701 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
TISAX vs HITRUST CSF
Compare TISAX vs HITRUST CSF: Automotive security meets regulatory compliance. Uncover key differences, implementation strategies, and choose the right framework for your industry risks and certification.
SOX vs EN 1090
Discover SOX vs EN 1090: US financial controls meet EU steel/aluminium standards. Compare compliance paths, risks, execution classes & best practices for global ops. Master now!
APPI vs COBIT
Compare APPI vs COBIT: Japan's privacy law meets IT governance framework. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & phased implementation for global data mastery. Dive in!