Standards Comparison

    APPI

    Mandatory
    2003

    Japan's regulation for protecting personal information privacy

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

    Quick Verdict

    APPI governs personal data protection for Japan businesses with consent and rights focus, while APRA CPS 234 mandates cyber resilience for Australian financial firms via board oversight and testing. Organizations adopt APPI for market access, CPS 234 for regulatory compliance.

    Data Privacy

    APPI

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Extraterritorial reach to foreign businesses targeting Japan
    • Pseudonymously processed data enables consent-free purpose changes
    • Explicit prior consent required for sensitive data transfers
    • PPC enforcement with up to ¥100M administrative fines
    • Pseudonymous information treated distinctly from anonymized data
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Third-party managed assets fully in scope
    • Systematic risk-based control testing required
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    APPI Details

    What It Is

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) is Japan's primary national regulation enacted in 2003 with major amendments in 2022. It governs handling of personal data by businesses, balancing privacy rights with economic data use. Scope covers all organizations processing Japanese residents' data, with extraterritorial effect for foreign entities targeting Japan. Employs risk-based, principle-driven approach emphasizing consent, security, and data subject rights.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, security safeguards.
    • Handles personal, sensitive, and pseudonymously processed information.
    • **Data subject rightsaccess, correction, deletion, objection within strict timelines.
    • Enforcement by Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC); compliance via guidelines, no mandatory certification but P Mark voluntary.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for data handlers to avoid ¥100M fines, breach notifications, reputational damage. Drives trust (78% consumers prefer compliant brands), enables cross-border transfers, efficiency gains (15-25% cost reduction), market access in Japan's economy.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased 5-stage framework (12-24 months): gap analysis, policy design, technical controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes/industries (tech, finance, e-commerce); SMEs lighter touch. Focuses data mapping, DPO appointment, vendor DPAs; PPC audits enforce.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates APRA-regulated entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities. Its risk-based approach focuses on governance, controls, testing, and rapid notification to ensure resilience against cyber incidents impacting confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties.

    Key Components

    • 11 core requirements spanning board accountability, role definitions, policy frameworks, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit assurance, and APRA notifications (72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for control weaknesses).
    • Built on CIA triad principles with commensurability to risks.
    • No certification; compliance via evidence-driven assurance and supervisory review.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for APRA-regulated financial institutions (banks, insurers, super funds) to avoid enforcement, penalties, and heightened scrutiny.
    • Enhances cyber resilience, third-party oversight, stakeholder trust, and operational continuity.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, asset inventory, control design, testing programs, TPRM integration.
    • Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; requires board oversight, independent audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    APPI
    Personal data protection, consent, rights
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security, cyber resilience

    Industry

    APPI
    All industries, Japan-focused
    APRA CPS 234
    Financial services, Australia-regulated

    Nature

    APPI
    Mandatory privacy law
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential standard

    Testing

    APPI
    Self-assessments, audits
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent testing, annual reviews

    Penalties

    APPI
    ¥100M fines, imprisonment
    APRA CPS 234
    Supervisory actions, remediation orders

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about APPI and APRA CPS 234

    APPI FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages