APPI
Japan's regulation for personal information protection compliance
AS9110C
International standard for aviation maintenance quality management.
Quick Verdict
APPI mandates privacy protections for Japanese personal data across industries, enforced by PPC fines. AS9110C is a voluntary QMS certification for aviation MROs ensuring safety and quality via audits. Organizations adopt APPI for legal compliance, AS9110C for market access.
APPI
Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope for foreign businesses targeting Japan
- Pseudonymized data enables consent-free purpose changes
- Explicit prior consent for sensitive data transfers
- ¥100 million fines enforced by independent PPC
- 30-day data subject access and deletion rights
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems Requirements for Aviation Maintenance
Key Features
- Risk-based thinking in operational planning and execution
- Configuration management and product traceability controls
- Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention program
- Human factors integration in root cause analysis
- Dedicated safety policy and continuing airworthiness focus
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
APPI Details
What It Is
Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) is Japan's primary regulation for handling personal data, enacted in 2003 with major amendments in 2022-2024. It governs collection, use, security, and transfers of identifiable data, balancing privacy with digital economy needs through risk-based, principle-driven approaches like purpose limitation and data minimization.
Key Components
- Core pillars: consent, security controls, data subject rights (access, correction, deletion), breach notifications.
- Heightened rules for sensitive information (medical, financial) and pseudonymized data.
- Built on transparency, minimization, accountability; enforced by Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC) with ¥100M fines.
- No certification, but compliance via self-assessments and audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for businesses handling Japanese residents' data; avoids fines, reputational damage.
- Builds trust (78% consumers prefer compliant brands), enables cross-border transfers.
- Strategic ROI: 20-30% efficiency gains, market access in $5T economy.
Implementation Overview
- Phased framework (12-24 months): gap analysis, policy design, technical controls, monitoring.
- Applies to all sizes/industries targeting Japan; extraterritorial for foreigners.
- Cross-functional teams, tools like DLP, consent portals; ongoing PPC audits.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is a certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for continuing airworthiness, using a risk-based thinking approach via Annex SL structure and PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Aviation additions: configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability.
- No fixed control count; focuses on documented information and process effectiveness.
- Certification via IAQG-accredited bodies with audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145).
- Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability, prevents errors in maintenance.
- Enhances market access via OASIS listing, improves on-time delivery and customer satisfaction.
- Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrable airworthiness compliance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to MROs globally, scalable by size.
- Requires 3+ months operational data pre-certification; 6-12 months typical timeline. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | APPI | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection and privacy | Aerospace maintenance quality management |
| Industry | All sectors handling Japanese data | Aviation MRO organizations globally |
| Nature | Mandatory Japanese privacy law | Voluntary QMS certification standard |
| Testing | PPC audits and inspections | Internal/external certification audits |
| Penalties | ¥100M fines, imprisonment | Loss of certification, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about APPI and AS9110C
APPI FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi
The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UL Certification vs CAA
Discover UL Certification vs CAA: Compare safety marks (Listed/Recognized/Classified), standards, testing, and compliance for products. Gain expert insights to choose wisely and boost market access. Explore now!
HIPAA vs WCAG
Discover HIPAA vs WCAG: Compare health data privacy/security rules with web accessibility standards. Master compliant patient portals—boost security, inclusion & avoid fines now.
NIST 800-171 vs EU AI Act
Compare NIST 800-171 vs EU AI Act: Decode US CUI safeguards & EU high-risk AI rules. Gain insights on controls, compliance gaps & strategies to thrive globally. Read now!