Standards Comparison

    APPI

    Mandatory
    2003

    Japan's regulation for protecting personal information handling

    VS

    MAS TRM

    Mandatory
    2021

    Singapore guidelines for technology risk management in finance

    Quick Verdict

    APPI mandates personal data protection for Japan-targeting firms with consent and rights enforcement, while MAS TRM provides cyber resilience guidelines for Singapore FIs. Companies adopt APPI for market access, TRM to meet supervisory expectations and build trust.

    Data Privacy

    APPI

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Extraterritorial reach to foreign businesses targeting Japan
    • Pseudonymously processed info enables flexible analytics
    • Explicit prior consent for sensitive data transfers
    • PPC fines up to ¥100 million for violations
    • Four-tier security measures: systematic, human, physical, technical
    Technology Risk Management

    MAS TRM

    MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board and senior management accountability
    • Proportional risk-based implementation
    • Third-party risk as first-class citizen
    • End-to-end technology lifecycle controls
    • Annual penetration testing for internet systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    APPI Details

    What It Is

    Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) is Japan's primary regulation enacted in 2003 with major 2022 amendments. It governs collection, use, security, and transfer of personal data identifying individuals, balancing privacy with digital economy needs via risk-based, consent-driven approach.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, security, data subject rights.
    • Sensitive data (medical, race) requires explicit consent; pseudonymized info allows flexible use.
    • PPC enforces via audits, ¥100M fines; no certification but P Mark voluntary.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for businesses handling Japanese data; avoids fines, breaches, reputational harm.
    • Builds trust (78% consumers prefer compliant brands), enables cross-border transfers, ROI via efficiency.
    • Strategic for tech, e-commerce, finance in Japan's economy.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phased frameworkgap analysis, governance, controls, testing (12-24 months).
    • Applies to all sizes targeting Japan; multinationals harmonize with GDPR.
    • Data mapping, DPO appointment, vendor DPAs essential; ongoing monitoring.

    MAS TRM Details

    What It Is

    MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions (FIs). They provide a principles-based framework for governing and managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing proportional implementation based on risk profile, complexity, and criticality to ensure CIA (confidentiality, integrity, availability).

    Key Components

    • Covers 15 sections: governance, risk frameworks, SDLC, IT service management, resilience, access control, cryptography, data security, cyber operations, assessments, and audit.
    • Synthesizes 12 core principles like board accountability, asset inventory, third-party oversight, secure engineering, and layered defenses.
    • No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes with independent assurance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets MAS supervisory expectations to avoid fines/enforcement.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces cyber/incident risks, builds customer trust.
    • Enables secure digital transformation and third-party ecosystems.

    Implementation Overview

    • Risk-based rollout: asset inventory, gap analysis, control design, testing.
    • Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
    • No formal certification; evidenced via audits, metrics, board reporting.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    APPI
    Personal data protection, consent, rights, transfers
    MAS TRM
    Technology/cyber risk governance, resilience, cybersecurity

    Industry

    APPI
    All sectors handling Japanese data
    MAS TRM
    Singapore financial institutions only

    Nature

    APPI
    Mandatory national law with PPC enforcement
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory guidelines, risk-proportional

    Testing

    APPI
    Self-audits, PPC inspections
    MAS TRM
    Annual pen tests, DR tests, cyber exercises

    Penalties

    APPI
    ¥100M fines, 1-2yr imprisonment
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory actions, fines, license restrictions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about APPI and MAS TRM

    APPI FAQ

    MAS TRM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages