APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
ISO 30301
International standard for management systems for records
Quick Verdict
APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial institutions with strict testing and notifications, while ISO 30301 provides voluntary records management certification for any organization. Firms adopt CPS 234 for regulatory compliance; ISO 30301 for governance and auditability.
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour notification to APRA for material incidents
- Extends requirements to third-party managed assets
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
- Systematic independent testing and internal audit assurance
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for MSS integration
- Normative Annex A operational controls
- Explicit records requirements analysis
- Flexible conformity pathways options
- Risk-based planning and objectives
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation for APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers and super funds. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates resilience against cyber threats via commensurate information security capabilities protecting confidentiality, integrity and availability of assets, including third-party managed ones.
Key Components
- Governance with Board ultimate responsibility (para 13)
- Asset classification by criticality/sensitivity (para 20)
- Lifecycle controls, systematic testing, internal audit (paras 21-34)
- Incident response plans, annual testing (paras 23-26)
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents (para 35) Risk-based, assurance-driven model without prescribed controls.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures prudential compliance, minimizes incident impacts on customers/depositors, strengthens third-party oversight. Builds operational resilience, avoids penalties, enhances trust and competitive edge in financial services.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls/testing, incident playbooks. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; no certification but APRA supervision/enforcement. Involves Board reporting, third-party assessments.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It provides a certifiable framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records management, ensuring authoritative evidence of business activities. Applicable to any organization, it uses a risk-based, High-Level Structure (HLS) approach (Clauses 4–10) combined with records-specific operations.
Key Components
- **HLS clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)Lifecycle controls for creation, capture, access, retention, disposition.
- Core principles: Authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Flexible conformity: Self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances governance, compliance (legal/regulatory), and risk mitigation (loss, alteration).
- Drives efficiency, transparency, auditability; integrates with ISO 9001, 27001.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supports business continuity.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: Gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, training, audits. Scalable for all sizes/industries; certification optional via accredited bodies. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | APRA CPS 234 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Information security governance and cyber resilience | Management system for records lifecycle controls |
| Industry | Australian financial institutions only | Any organization worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory prudential regulation | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | Systematic independent control testing annually | Internal audits and management reviews |
| Penalties | Supervisory actions, penalties, license risks | No legal penalties, certification loss only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about APRA CPS 234 and ISO 30301
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ENERGY STAR vs ISO 17025
Compare ENERGY STAR vs ISO 17025: U.S. efficiency benchmark vs global lab competence standard. Uncover key differences, certification paths, and strategies for energy savings and compliance. Dive in now!
DORA vs GDPR
DORA vs GDPR: EU finance resilience act meets data privacy law. Compare ICT risks, 4-hr reporting vs 72-hr, testing, third-party oversight & fines. Master compliance now!
Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 28000
Compare Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 28000: Principles-based privacy (APPs, NDB) meets supply chain security standards. Uncover gaps, risks, reforms & strategies for compliance. Safeguard data now!