What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations that ensures product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** Developed by the IAQG, AS9100D (2016) builds on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, adding over 100 aerospace-specific requirements in Clause 8, including operational risk management (8.1.1), configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), and counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4). It mandates process-based controls, risk-based thinking across enterprise (Clause 6.1) and operational levels, and lifecycle assurance to prevent catastrophic failures.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies to organizations that design, develop, manufacture, or service aviation, space, and defense products.** It targets manufacturers of parts, materials suppliers, design centers, and service providers in ASD supply chains; AS9110 suits MRO, AS9120 distributors. Certification is contractually required by major OEMs/primes for supplier qualification and OASIS database visibility—no legal mandates, but non-compliance excludes firms from bids and approved lists.

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires accredited third-party certification via Stage 1 (readiness/documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation/effectiveness) audits.** Performed by IAQG-recognized bodies using AS9101 guidance, certification demands objective evidence of process effectiveness. Maintenance involves annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years; nonconformities require corrective action within 60–90 days.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals based on risk, with full management reviews at least annually.** Certification includes annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification by accredited bodies. Clause 9 mandates ongoing monitoring of KPIs, internal audits covering all processes, and management reviews addressing performance, risks, and improvements.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension, contract termination, and market exclusion from OEM supply chains.** Audits yield major nonconformities (systemic failures in Clause 8 controls) requiring root-cause correction; repeated issues lead to lost OASIS visibility, bid disqualifications, rework costs, and safety incidents triggering regulatory probes or liability.

Can **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns with ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure, enabling integrated management systems.** Its 10-clause PDCA model (Clauses 4–10) supports mapping to standards sharing this framework, with aerospace additions (e.g., product safety, counterfeit prevention) layered atop common requirements like risk-based thinking and supplier controls.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is conducting a gap analysis against AS9100D clauses to assess current QMS maturity.** Form a cross-functional team to map processes, identify gaps in aerospace requirements (e.g., Clause 8 controls), define scope per Clause 4.3, and produce a prioritized remediation plan with timelines and resources.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it follows a risk-based, PDCA structure across ten Annex SL clauses, emphasizing principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability for all organization sizes and sectors.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a voluntary Type B guidance standard without mandatory requirements.** It applies to all types and sizes of organizations facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal obligations, enabling benchmarking for sectors like financial services, manufacturing, healthcare, and SMEs to demonstrate CMS effectiveness to regulators and stakeholders.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a non-certifiable Type B guidance document.** Organizations conduct internal audits per Clause 9.2 (using ISO 19011) and self-assessments to benchmark their CMS, with no formal certification possible—unlike its successor ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should occur at planned intervals via internal audits, management reviews, and continual reassessment triggered by changes in context, obligations, or risks.** Clause 9 requires monitoring, measurement, and audits per schedules in the performance evaluation plan, with management reviews (Clause 9.3) typically quarterly to evaluate CMS suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal obligations or penalties.** However, lacking a structured CMS increases exposure to regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, and higher insurance costs from unaddressed compliance obligations and risks.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600's Annex SL high-level structure enables seamless mapping to other management system frameworks.** Its ten clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) align with integrated systems, supporting risk-based integration while preserving compliance function independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is securing top-management commitment and establishing CMS scope per Clauses 4 and 5.** Form a Compliance Steering Committee, document organizational context, interested parties, and boundaries as available information, ensuring leadership endorsement via a signed charter.

AS9100 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

International aerospace quality management system standard

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

AS9100 delivers aerospace-specific QMS certification for aviation suppliers ensuring product safety and supply chain integrity, while ISO 19600 provides general CMS guidelines for broad compliance risk management. Organizations adopt AS9100 for market access; ISO 19600 for governance frameworks.

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D: Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, Defense

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Product safety controls across entire lifecycle
Configuration management ensuring design integrity
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection processes
Operational risk management in Clause 8
Enhanced supplier controls and traceability

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based CMS guidelines for all organizations
Principles of good governance and proportionality
PDCA cycle with Annex SL structure
Scalable integration with other ISO standards
Precursor to certifiable ISO 37301

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (2016) is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements. Its primary purpose is ensuring product safety, reliability, and supply chain integrity in high-risk sectors. The approach is process-based with embedded risk-based thinking across 10 clauses.

Key Components

Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
Core pillars: leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Built on ISO 9001 Annex SL structure.
Certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

Why Organizations Use It

Meets OEM/contractual mandates for market access.
Reduces defects, escapes, and costs; improves delivery.
Manages safety risks and counterfeit threats.
Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS visibility.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-18 months).
Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally.
Requires documented processes, internal audits, management reviews.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. Its primary purpose is providing recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The scope applies to all organization sizes, sectors, and geographies, using a risk-based, principles-driven approach aligned with Annex SL structure and PDCA cycle.

Key Components

Ten clauses covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
No fixed number of controls; emphasizes flexible risk assessment, obligations identification, and integration with standards like ISO 9001.
Non-certifiable benchmarking model, predecessor to ISO 37301.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates regulatory penalties, operational disruptions, reputational damage.
Enhances decision-making, efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access.
Builds integrity culture, future-proofs for certification.
Demonstrates accountability to stakeholders.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, deployment, continuous improvement. Scalable for SMEs to multinationals; no formal certification, internal audits recommended. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9100	ISO 19600
Scope	Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls	General CMS guidelines for compliance obligations and risks
Industry	Aviation, space, defense organizations globally	All industries and organization types worldwide
Nature	Certifiable QMS standard with mandatory requirements	Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary implementation
Testing	Third-party Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance	Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessment
Penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial	No formal penalties, internal governance risks

Scope

AS9100

Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls

ISO 19600

General CMS guidelines for compliance obligations and risks

Industry

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense organizations globally

ISO 19600

All industries and organization types worldwide

Nature

AS9100

Certifiable QMS standard with mandatory requirements

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary implementation

Testing

AS9100

Third-party Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessment

Penalties

AS9100

Loss of certification, market access denial

ISO 19600

No formal penalties, internal governance risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9100 and ISO 19600

AS9100 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

REACH vs ISO 27701

REACH vs ISO 27701: EU chemicals regulation meets privacy management standard. Compare compliance, risks, strategies for substances & PII. Expert guide now!

COBIT vs ISO 17025

Compare COBIT vs ISO 17025: IT governance framework meets lab competence standard. Explore key differences in principles, objectives, design factors & compliance to optimize your enterprise strategy. Discover now!

UL Certification vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Discover UL Certification vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Safety marks, testing & audits vs electronic records validation, signatures & data integrity. Expert compliance guide!

AS9100

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

AS9100

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

Can AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

REACH vs ISO 27701

COBIT vs ISO 17025

UL Certification vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11