GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/AS9100 vs ISO 28000
    Standards Comparison

    AS9100 vs ISO 28000

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace quality management system extending ISO 9001

    VS

    ISO 28000

    Voluntary
    2022

    International standard for supply chain security management systems

    Quick Verdict

    AS9100 enhances ISO 9001 for aerospace quality, safety, and supply chain integrity, while ISO 28000 establishes risk-based security management across all supply chains. Aerospace firms adopt AS9100 for OEM approval; others use ISO 28000 for resilience and compliance.

    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D:2016 Quality Management Systems - Aerospace

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Configuration management ensures product integrity lifecycle
    • Product safety controls across entire lifecycle
    • Counterfeit parts prevention and detection processes
    • Operational risk management in production planning
    • Enhanced supplier controls and traceability requirements
    Supply Chain Security

    ISO 28000

    ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems — Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based supply chain security management framework
    • PDCA cycle with HLS for ISO standards integration
    • Leadership-driven policy and supplier governance
    • Operational controls for physical, cyber, personnel risks
    • Internal audits and third-party certification pathway

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D:2016 is the international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation, space, and defense. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements. Primary purpose: ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability in high-risk sectors. Adopts a process-based, risk-oriented approach via 10-clause Annex SL structure.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: operational planning (Clause 8), with configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit prevention (8.1.4), operational risks (8.1.1).
    • Built on ISO 9001 PDCA cycle, plus human factors, supplier controls.
    • Certification via accredited third-party audits: Stage 1/2 initial, annual surveillance, triennial recertification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Market access: required by OEMs/primes for contracts.
    • Risk reduction: prevents safety incidents, escapes, counterfeits.
    • Benefits: improved delivery, lower defects, supply chain resilience.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via OASIS database visibility.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
    • Applies to designers/manufacturers in ASD; 6-18 months typical.
    • Involves cross-functional teams, digital tools for traceability.

    ISO 28000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 28000:2022 — Security and resilience — Security management systems — Requirements — is an international management system standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a security management system (SMS) tailored to supply chain security. It uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) framework, not prescriptive controls.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement
    • Risk assessment/treatment aligned with ISO 31000
    • Security policy, objectives, operational controls, supplier governance
    • High Level Structure (HLS) for ISO integration
    • Third-party certification via accredited bodies (ISO 28003)

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces theft, sabotage, disruptions; lowers insurance costs
    • Meets contractual/regulatory needs (e.g., C-TPAT equivalents)
    • Enhances resilience, market access, trade facilitation
    • Builds trust with stakeholders, partners, customers

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, gap analysis, risk strategy, deployment, audits
    • Scalable for all sizes/industries (logistics, manufacturing, pharma)
    • 6–36 months; requires training, KPIs, continual improvement

    Key Differences

    AspectAS9100ISO 28000
    ScopeAerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controlsSupply chain security management system risks
    IndustryAviation, space, defense organizations globallyAll supply chain sectors, any organization size
    NatureVoluntary certification standard building on ISO 9001Voluntary management system standard for security
    TestingStage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recert every 3 yearsInternal audits, management review, optional certification audits
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, market access denialNo legal penalties, potential business continuity risks

    Scope

    AS9100
    Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls
    ISO 28000
    Supply chain security management system risks

    Industry

    AS9100
    Aviation, space, defense organizations globally
    ISO 28000
    All supply chain sectors, any organization size

    Nature

    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard building on ISO 9001
    ISO 28000
    Voluntary management system standard for security

    Testing

    AS9100
    Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recert every 3 years
    ISO 28000
    Internal audits, management review, optional certification audits

    Penalties

    AS9100
    Loss of certification, market access denial
    ISO 28000
    No legal penalties, potential business continuity risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9100 and ISO 28000

    AS9100 FAQ

    ISO 28000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

    SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

    Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

    5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

    5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

    Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)

    Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how AS9100 and ISO 28000 compare against other standards

    Other AS9100 Comparisons

    • EPA vs AS9100
    • SQF vs AS9100
    • WCAG vs AS9100
    • ISO 14001 vs AS9100
    • RoHS vs AS9100

    Other ISO 28000 Comparisons

    • ISO 37301 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 56002 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 21001 vs ISO 28000
    • C-TPAT vs ISO 28000
    • GLBA vs ISO 28000
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved