AS9100
International standard for aerospace quality management systems
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC rules mandating cybersecurity incident disclosures
Quick Verdict
AS9100 ensures aerospace quality via rigorous QMS for suppliers; U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate timely cyber incident and governance disclosures for public firms. Aerospace firms pursue certification for contracts; public companies comply to avoid SEC penalties and inform investors.
AS9100
AS9100D Aerospace Quality Management System Standard
Key Features
- Aerospace-specific risk management with FMEA lifecycle integration
- Configuration management ensuring product traceability and integrity
- Counterfeit parts prevention controls in supply chain
- Product safety hazard identification and mitigation processes
- Enhanced supplier approval, audits, and performance monitoring
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents
- Annual risk management, strategy, and governance disclosures
- Board oversight and management role requirements
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data
- Inclusion of third-party incident risks
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D is the internationally recognized Aerospace Quality Management System (QMS) standard, building on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 sector-specific requirements for aviation, space, and defense. It focuses on design, production, and servicing of aerospace products using a process-based, risk-informed PDCA approach emphasizing lifecycle risk management.
Key Components
- **Core domainsRisk management (FMEA), configuration management, product safety, counterfeit prevention, supplier controls.
- **Structure10 clauses aligned with ISO 9001 Annex SL.
- **Aerospace additionsTraceability, special processes, human factors.
- **Certification modelThird-party audits via IAQG-accredited bodies, with Stage 1/2 initial audits and annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- **Business driversMarket access, 15-30% rework reduction, supply-chain resilience.
- **ComplianceContractual mandates from OEMs like Boeing, Airbus.
- **Risk benefits40% field failure decrease via proactive mitigation.
- **AdvantagesPreferential bidding, operational efficiency, litigation defense.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachGap analysis, process redesign, training, internal audits, certification.
- **ActivitiesFMEA, SOP updates, QMS software deployment.
- **ApplicabilityOEMs, suppliers, MROs globally; scales to SMEs.
- **AuditsTriennial recertification.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216) are federal regulations requiring standardized disclosures by public companies. They mandate timely reporting of material cybersecurity incidents and annual updates on risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligning with securities law principles without bright-line thresholds.
Key Components
- **Form 8-K Item 1.05Four-business-day disclosure of material incidents' nature, scope, timing, and impacts.
- **Regulation S-K Item 106Annual descriptions of risk processes, board oversight, and management's role.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data.
- No fixed controls; focuses on processes, governance, and third-party risks. Compliance via filings, no separate certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Public companies comply to meet Exchange Act obligations, protect investors, enhance market efficiency, and reduce enforcement risks like penalties seen in Yahoo, Meta cases. Benefits include better risk integration, investor trust, and resilient governance.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: incident reporting from Dec 2023/June 2024; annual from FYE Dec 2023. Involves gap analysis, disclosure playbooks, cross-functional committees, third-party contracts, and XBRL tools. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants; no audits but SEC reviews filings.
Key Differences
| Aspect | AS9100 | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Aerospace QMS with risk, configuration, safety | Public company cyber incident, governance disclosure |
| Industry | Aerospace, aviation, space, defense suppliers | All SEC registrants, public companies |
| Nature | Voluntary certification standard (contractual) | Mandatory SEC reporting regulation |
| Testing | Internal audits, certification audits every 3 years | No audits; materiality assessments, filings |
| Penalties | Certification loss, contract termination | SEC enforcement, fines, civil penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AS9100 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
AS9100 FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SOC 2 vs SOX
SOC 2 vs SOX: Decode key differences—voluntary security audits for SaaS vs mandatory financial controls for public firms. Build trust, cut risks—expert insights inside!
NIS2 vs WEEE
Explore NIS2 vs WEEE: Cybersecurity resilience (incident reports in 24-72hrs, 2% fines) meets e-waste rules (65% collection, EPR). Key scopes, penalties & compliance guide.
ISO 31000 vs CIS Controls
Uncover ISO 31000 vs CIS Controls: Enterprise risk guidelines vs cybersecurity safeguards. Align strategy, boost compliance & resilience. Discover differences now!