What is the primary objective of **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for organizations that procure, store, split, and resell aerospace parts without altering product characteristics.** Built on ISO 9001:2015’s 10-clause structure, it adds over 100 aerospace-specific requirements addressing distribution risks like loss of traceability, counterfeit/suspected unapproved parts, documentation errors, and external provider controls to ensure chain-of-custody integrity.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9120B**?

**AS9120B applies to stockist distributors, pass-through distributors, and organizations performing batch splitting in aviation, space, and defense supply chains.** Certification is not legally mandatory but is a commercial requirement imposed by OEMs and primes for supplier approval and OASIS listing; as of May 2023, 2,442 global certifications (836 in U.S.) underscore its role as a market entry criterion for ASD distributors excluding those altering product or performing MRO.

Does **AS9120B** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9120B requires third-party certification through accredited bodies following a two-stage audit process per IAQG rules.** Stage 1 reviews documentation and scope; Stage 2 verifies implementation via on-site audits using AS9101F criteria, leading to OASIS registration for visibility; surveillance audits occur annually, with recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9120B** be performed?

**AS9120B requires internal audits at planned intervals to cover the QMS annually, plus management reviews at defined intervals aligning with strategic direction.** Assessments include monitoring KPIs (e.g., nonconformities, on-time delivery), customer satisfaction, supplier performance, and risk action effectiveness, with full recertification audits every three years and annual surveillance by certification bodies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9120B**?

**Non-compliance with AS9120B results in certification suspension/revocation, exclusion from OEM supply chains, and OASIS delisting.** Operationally, it risks major audit nonconformities (e.g., traceability failures, counterfeit lapses), contract penalties, recalls, legal liabilities for product safety issues, and commercial disqualification, as it undermines chain-of-custody proving conformity and authenticity.

An **AS9120B** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9120B aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015’s high-level structure, enabling seamless mapping of its 10 clauses.** Aerospace additions (e.g., counterfeit prevention, traceability) integrate with IAQG standards like AS9100D via shared terminology and controls, supporting multi-standard QMS without clause exclusions compromising conformity.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9120B**?

**The first step is conducting a formal gap analysis against AS9120B clauses using a cross-functional team to document scope, context (Clause 4), and applicability.** Justify “not applicable” determinations (e.g., 8.3 Design), prioritize distributor risks like traceability and suppliers, and produce a risk register to inform the implementation backlog.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **Basel III**?

**Basel III applies primarily to internationally active banks and large banking groups as minimum standards implemented via national laws.** National supervisors extend it to domestic banks; G-SIBs and D-SIBs face additional CET1 buffers. Globally coordinated by BCBS across 27 jurisdictions, compliance is enforced through domestic rules like EU CRR3/CRD6 or U.S. Federal Reserve implementations, affecting consolidated groups including subsidiaries.

Does **Basel III** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Basel III does not mandate external audit or third-party certification but requires robust internal processes subject to supervisory review under Pillar 2.** Supervisors assess ICAAP, stress testing, and model validation, potentially imposing capital add-ons. Pillar 3 demands standardized public disclosures (e.g., KM1, LR1/LR2, CDC templates) for market discipline, with internal audit ensuring data integrity and reporting accuracy.

How often should an assessment for **Basel III** be performed?

**Basel III assessments must be performed continuously with formal reviews at least annually as part of ICAAP and supervisory reporting cycles.** Ongoing monitoring covers CET1/RWA ratios, leverage exposures, LCR/NSFR, and buffers; quarterly Pillar 3 disclosures apply for key metrics. Supervisors expect real-time dashboards, stress testing, and model performance checks to detect breaches in distribution constraints or output floors.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **Basel III**?

**Non-compliance with Basel III triggers supervisory enforcement including fines, capital add-ons, dividend restrictions, and business limitations.** Buffer breaches activate automatic payout constraints (dividends, buybacks, AT1 coupons); severe cases lead to asset caps, management changes, or resolution. Examples include multimillion fines (e.g., Citigroup $136M for data deficiencies) and market access restrictions, enforced via national regulators.

Can **Basel III** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, Basel III can be mapped to other international frameworks through shared prudential elements like capital and liquidity metrics.** Its three-pillar structure (capital requirements, supervisory review, disclosures) aligns with Basel II evolution, while jurisdictional implementations (e.g., U.S. SLRs, EU overlays) facilitate cross-mapping. BCBS RCAP assesses consistency, enabling comparability despite national discretions.

What is the first step to begin implementing **Basel III**?

**The first step to implement Basel III is to establish executive sponsorship and a program governance structure including a steering committee and RACI matrix.** Conduct a baseline gap analysis quantifying CET1, leverage, LCR/NSFR impacts via QIS, mapping to BCBS standards and local rules. Prioritize data lineage, traceability matrices, and Pillar 1 calculations for capital/liquidity.

AS9120B vs Basel III

Q: What is the primary objective of **Basel III**?

**The primary objective of Basel III is to strengthen the regulation, supervision, and risk management of banks by enhancing the quality and quantity of regulatory capital, constraining leverage, and ensuring liquidity resilience.** Issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2007-2009 crisis, it addresses capital inadequacies, excessive leverage, and liquidity shortfalls through minimum CET1 ratios of 4.5%, Tier 1 at 6%, total capital at 8%, a 3% leverage ratio, LCR ≥100% for 30-day stress, and NSFR ≥100% for one-year funding stability.

Standards Comparison

AS9120B

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for distributors ensuring traceability and safety

Basel III

Mandatory

2010

Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards

Quick Verdict

AS9120B provides QMS certification for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention, while Basel III mandates capital, leverage, and liquidity standards for banks to enhance financial resilience. Organizations adopt AS9120B for supply chain approval; Basel III for regulatory compliance.

Quality Management

AS9120B

AS9120B:2016 Aerospace Quality Management for Distributors

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Robust traceability and chain-of-custody for split lots
Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
Risk-based external provider evaluation and flowdown
Configuration management for distribution operations
Product safety and ethical behavior awareness requirements

Financial Risk Management

Basel III

Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Strengthened CET1 capital requirements and buffers
Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
Net Stable Funding Ratio for funding stability
Enhanced Pillar 3 RWA disclosure templates

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

AS9120B Details

What It Is

AS9120B:2016 is a certification standard for aerospace quality management systems (QMS) tailored to stockist distributors. Built on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, it adds over 100 distributor-specific requirements using a risk-based thinking approach to address supply chain risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.

Key Components

Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Core focuses: traceability, counterfeit prevention, external provider controls, configuration management.
Over 100 aerospace additions to ISO baseline.
IAQG certification via OASIS database listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Enables market access to OEMs/Tier 1 suppliers.
Mitigates risks of nonconforming parts and legal liabilities.
Builds customer trust through proven chain-of-custody.
Drives efficiency, reduces defects, enhances competitiveness.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
Cross-functional teams, risk registers, internal audits.
Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
Requires accredited certification body Stage 1/2 audits.

Basel III Details

What It Is

Basel III is the international prudential regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-global financial crisis. It enhances bank resilience by strengthening capital quality and quantity, introducing leverage constraints, and mandating liquidity buffers. Its multi-metric, risk-based approach combines RWA-based ratios with non-risk-based backstops.

Key Components

**Pillar 1Minimum capital ratios (CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8% + 2.5% conservation buffer), leverage ratio (3%), LCR (100%), NSFR (100%).
**Pillar 2Supervisory review via ICAAP and stress testing.
**Pillar 3Standardized disclosures for RWA comparability. Built on revised risk approaches with output floor; compliance via ongoing reporting, no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for banks in adopting jurisdictions to meet legal requirements, reduce systemic risk, constrain leverage, and ensure liquidity. Benefits include lower funding costs, improved market discipline, and strategic balance-sheet optimization amid jurisdictional variations.

Implementation Overview

Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, model governance, training. Targets internationally active banks globally; involves PMO, traceability matrices, supervisory audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	AS9120B	Basel III
Scope	Aerospace distributor QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention	Bank capital, leverage, liquidity resilience standards
Industry	Aerospace distribution, global certifications	Banking sector, international prudential regulation
Nature	Voluntary QMS certification standard	Mandatory prudential regulatory framework
Testing	IAQG audits, internal audits, management review	Stress tests, ICAAP, supervisory review processes
Penalties	Loss of certification, market exclusion	Fines, asset caps, supervisory enforcement actions

Scope

AS9120B

Aerospace distributor QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention

Basel III

Bank capital, leverage, liquidity resilience standards

Industry

AS9120B

Aerospace distribution, global certifications

Basel III

Banking sector, international prudential regulation

Nature

AS9120B

Voluntary QMS certification standard

Basel III

Mandatory prudential regulatory framework

Testing

AS9120B

IAQG audits, internal audits, management review

Basel III

Stress tests, ICAAP, supervisory review processes

Penalties

AS9120B

Loss of certification, market exclusion

Basel III

Fines, asset caps, supervisory enforcement actions

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AS9120B and Basel III

AS9120B FAQ

Basel III FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint

Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

POPIA vs ISO 19600

Compare POPIA vs ISO 19600: SA's privacy law meets global compliance guidelines. Discover key differences, synergies, and strategies for integrated risk management and enforcement readiness.

CCPA vs AS9100

Compare CCPA vs AS9100: Privacy law for CA data rights meets aerospace QMS rigor. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies, risks & implementation tips. Boost dual mastery now!

NIS2 vs SAMA CSF

Discover NIS2 vs SAMA CSF: EU directive's broad scope & strict reporting vs Saudi financial maturity model (Levels 0-5). Compare fines, domains & compliance—master both now!

AS9120B

Basel III

Quick Verdict

AS9120B

Key Features

Basel III

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

AS9120B Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Basel III Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

AS9120B FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9120B?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9120B?

Does AS9120B require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9120B be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9120B?

An AS9120B be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9120B?

Basel III FAQ

What is the primary objective of Basel III?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with Basel III?

Does Basel III require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for Basel III be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with Basel III?

Can Basel III be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing Basel III?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

POPIA vs ISO 19600

CCPA vs AS9100

NIS2 vs SAMA CSF