Australian Privacy Act
Australian federal regulation for personal information handling
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.
Quick Verdict
Australian Privacy Act governs personal data handling economy-wide via 13 APPs, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security capabilities for financial entities. Organizations adopt Privacy Act for broad compliance, CPS 234 for prudential cyber resilience.
Australian Privacy Act
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
Key Features
- 13 principles-based Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
- Mandatory Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme
- Accountability for cross-border disclosures (APP 8)
- Reasonable steps security and retention (APP 11)
- OAIC enforcement with AUD 50M penalties
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
- Third-party assets fully in scope with assessments
- Systematic risk-based control testing and assurance
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Australian Privacy Act Details
What It Is
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal privacy regulation, applying economy-wide to government agencies and private organizations. It regulates personal information handling through 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), using a principles-based, risk-calibrated approach requiring "reasonable steps" contextualized by entity size, data sensitivity, and harm potential.
Key Components
- **13 APPsGovern collection, notice, use/disclosure (APP 6-8), quality (APP 10), security/retention (APP 11), access/correction (APP 12-13).
- NDB scheme (Part IIIC): Mandates notification for breaches likely causing serious harm.
- OAIC enforcement: Investigations, audits, penalties up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover. No certification; compliance via demonstrable practices.
Why Organizations Use It
Meets legal obligations for entities over $3M turnover plus exceptions (health, TFN). Mitigates breach risks, enables transborder flows, builds stakeholder trust, avoids reputational/financial harm amid reforms.
Implementation Overview
Phased risk-based program: gap analysis, governance/policies, security controls, vendor management, incident readiness. Targets medium-large orgs, some small businesses; OAIC assessments verify adherence.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates cyber resilience for APRA-regulated financial entities like banks, insurers, and super funds. The risk-based approach requires capabilities commensurate with threats, covering governance, controls, and third-party assets.
Key Components
- **11 core requirementsBoard accountability, role definitions, policy framework, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit, and APRA notifications.
- Built on CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability).
- No fixed controls; commensurate with risk; enforced via supervision, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for compliance, avoiding penalties and scrutiny.
- Enhances operational resilience, stakeholder protection, and third-party oversight.
- Builds trust, reduces incident impact, integrates with CPS 220/230.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, governance, asset inventory, controls, testing, assurance.
- Applies to all sizes in Australian finance; internal audit and evidence-driven; third-parties from 2020.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Australian Privacy Act | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal information handling lifecycle | Information security and cyber resilience |
| Industry | Most private sector, agencies economy-wide | Regulated financial institutions only |
| Nature | Mandatory principles-based privacy law | Mandatory prudential security standard |
| Testing | Reasonable steps, no mandated frequency | Systematic testing, annual reviews required |
| Penalties | Up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover | Supervisory actions, remediation directives |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Australian Privacy Act and APRA CPS 234
Australian Privacy Act FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring
Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva

Your Guide to Implementing PCI DSS in Your Organization
Step-by-step guide to implementing PCI DSS in your organization. Achieve compliance, protect cardholder data, and reduce risks. Start securing payments today!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 26000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Uncover ISO 26000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Compare SR guidance on governance & risk with mandatory incident disclosures. Align strategies for compliance & resilience. Explore now!
SAFe vs CIS Controls
Uncover SAFe vs CIS Controls: Scale Agile with cybersecurity safeguards for compliant enterprise agility. Key insights on integration, ROI, and best practices. Dive in now!
NIST CSF vs ISO 56002
Compare NIST CSF vs ISO 56002: Cyber risk mastery meets innovation excellence. Discover key diffs, benefits & choose the right framework for your org. Read now!