Standards Comparison

    Australian Privacy Act

    Mandatory
    1988

    Australian federal regulation for personal information handling

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience.

    Quick Verdict

    Australian Privacy Act governs personal data handling economy-wide via 13 APPs, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security capabilities for financial entities. Organizations adopt Privacy Act for broad compliance, CPS 234 for prudential cyber resilience.

    Data Privacy

    Australian Privacy Act

    Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • 13 principles-based Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
    • Mandatory Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme
    • Accountability for cross-border disclosures (APP 8)
    • Reasonable steps security and retention (APP 11)
    • OAIC enforcement with AUD 50M penalties
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
    • Third-party assets fully in scope with assessments
    • Systematic risk-based control testing and assurance
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Australian Privacy Act Details

    What It Is

    Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal privacy regulation, applying economy-wide to government agencies and private organizations. It regulates personal information handling through 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs), using a principles-based, risk-calibrated approach requiring "reasonable steps" contextualized by entity size, data sensitivity, and harm potential.

    Key Components

    • **13 APPsGovern collection, notice, use/disclosure (APP 6-8), quality (APP 10), security/retention (APP 11), access/correction (APP 12-13).
    • NDB scheme (Part IIIC): Mandates notification for breaches likely causing serious harm.
    • OAIC enforcement: Investigations, audits, penalties up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover. No certification; compliance via demonstrable practices.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Meets legal obligations for entities over $3M turnover plus exceptions (health, TFN). Mitigates breach risks, enables transborder flows, builds stakeholder trust, avoids reputational/financial harm amid reforms.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased risk-based program: gap analysis, governance/policies, security controls, vendor management, incident readiness. Targets medium-large orgs, some small businesses; OAIC assessments verify adherence.

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates cyber resilience for APRA-regulated financial entities like banks, insurers, and super funds. The risk-based approach requires capabilities commensurate with threats, covering governance, controls, and third-party assets.

    Key Components

    • **11 core requirementsBoard accountability, role definitions, policy framework, asset classification, lifecycle controls, incident response, systematic testing, internal audit, and APRA notifications.
    • Built on CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, availability).
    • No fixed controls; commensurate with risk; enforced via supervision, no certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for compliance, avoiding penalties and scrutiny.
    • Enhances operational resilience, stakeholder protection, and third-party oversight.
    • Builds trust, reduces incident impact, integrates with CPS 220/230.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, governance, asset inventory, controls, testing, assurance.
    • Applies to all sizes in Australian finance; internal audit and evidence-driven; third-parties from 2020.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Australian Privacy Act
    Personal information handling lifecycle
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security and cyber resilience

    Industry

    Australian Privacy Act
    Most private sector, agencies economy-wide
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulated financial institutions only

    Nature

    Australian Privacy Act
    Mandatory principles-based privacy law
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential security standard

    Testing

    Australian Privacy Act
    Reasonable steps, no mandated frequency
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic testing, annual reviews required

    Penalties

    Australian Privacy Act
    Up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover
    APRA CPS 234
    Supervisory actions, remediation directives

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Australian Privacy Act and APRA CPS 234

    Australian Privacy Act FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages