Standards Comparison

    Australian Privacy Act

    Mandatory
    1988

    Australian federal regulation for personal information protection

    VS

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi framework for financial cybersecurity compliance

    Quick Verdict

    Australian Privacy Act mandates privacy principles for Australian organizations handling personal data, while SAMA CSF requires cybersecurity maturity for Saudi financial firms. Companies adopt them for legal compliance, risk reduction, and building trust in data handling and cyber resilience.

    Data Privacy

    Australian Privacy Act

    Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • 13 Australian Privacy Principles governing full data lifecycle
    • Notifiable Data Breaches scheme for serious harm notifications
    • Accountability model for cross-border data disclosures (APP 8)
    • Reasonable steps security and retention requirements (APP 11)
    • OAIC enforcement with AUD 50M maximum penalties
    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Six-level maturity model with Level 3 baseline
    • Four core domains including third-party security
    • Board-level governance and CISO requirements
    • Risk-based controls aligned with NIST/ISO
    • Periodic self-assessments and SAMA audits

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Australian Privacy Act Details

    What It Is

    Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) is Australia's primary federal regulation for handling personal information. It applies economy-wide to government agencies and private sector entities over AU$3M turnover, using a principles-based, risk-calibrated approach via 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) covering the data lifecycle.

    Key Components

    • **13 APPsGovernance (APP 1), collection/notice (APPs 3-5), use/disclosure/cross-border (APPs 6-8), quality/security/retention (APPs 10-11), access/correction (APPs 12-13).
    • NDB scheme (Part IIIC) for breach notifications.
    • OAIC oversight with investigations, audits, penalties up to AU$50M.
    • No formal certification; compliance via self-assessment and enforcement.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal mandate for covered entities; avoids penalties, reputational damage.
    • Manages cyber/privacy risks, enables transborder flows.
    • Builds trust, supports data-driven business.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls deployment, incident readiness.
    • Applies to medium-large orgs, all sectors with Australian link.
    • Ongoing audits, no certification but OAIC assessments.

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF Version 1.0, May 2017) is a mandatory regulatory framework for SAMA-regulated financial institutions in Saudi Arabia. It provides a principle-based, outcome-oriented approach to cybersecurity governance, controls, and maturity, focusing on detecting, resisting, responding to, and recovering from cyber threats across information assets.

    Key Components

    • Four main domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
    • Numerous subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations (114+ subcontrols).
    • Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model (Level 3 minimum: structured policies, standards, procedures monitored by KPIs).
    • Aligns with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; requires self-assessments and SAMA audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for banks, insurers, finance firms to avoid penalties, audits, fines.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces incident risks, improves efficiency.
    • Builds competitive edge, vendor leverage, stakeholder trust in digital economy.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design, deployment, operations, continuous improvement.
    • Applies to all sizes of SAMA entities in Saudi Arabia; iterative, risk-based rollout with board sponsorship.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Australian Privacy Act
    Personal info lifecycle, APPs, NDB breaches
    SAMA CSF
    Cybersecurity domains, maturity model, tech controls

    Industry

    Australian Privacy Act
    All sectors >$3M turnover, Australia-wide
    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial institutions only, mandatory

    Nature

    Australian Privacy Act
    Mandatory principles-based privacy law
    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory cybersecurity framework, maturity levels

    Testing

    Australian Privacy Act
    OAIC audits, assessments, investigations
    SAMA CSF
    Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits

    Penalties

    Australian Privacy Act
    Up to AUD 50M or 30% turnover fines
    SAMA CSF
    Fines, license suspension, supervisory actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Australian Privacy Act and SAMA CSF

    Australian Privacy Act FAQ

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages