Standards Comparison

    Basel III

    Mandatory
    2010

    Global framework for bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards

    VS

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi Central Bank's cybersecurity framework for financial sector

    Quick Verdict

    Basel III strengthens global bank capital, leverage, and liquidity resilience, while SAMA CSF mandates Saudi financial cybersecurity maturity. Banks adopt Basel for solvency; Saudi firms use SAMA for cyber compliance and audits.

    Financial Risk Management

    Basel III

    Basel III global regulatory framework for banks

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Elevates CET1 capital minimum to 4.5% of RWA
    • Adds 2.5% capital conservation buffer with restrictions
    • Introduces 3% non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
    • Mandates 100% LCR for 30-day liquidity stress
    • Requires 100% NSFR for one-year funding stability
    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model
    • Four core domains with 114+ sub-controls
    • Board-level governance and independent CISO
    • Principle-based risk management approach
    • Third-party cybersecurity requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Basel III Details

    What It Is

    Basel III is the post-GFC global regulatory framework by the BCBS for bank prudential standards. It strengthens capital quality and quantity, introduces leverage constraints, and mandates liquidity buffers to address crisis vulnerabilities. The approach combines risk-weighted assets with simple non-risk-based metrics for comprehensive resilience.

    Key Components

    • **Pillar 1Capital ratios (CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8% of RWA), buffers (conservation 2.5%, countercyclical, G-SIB), leverage ratio 3%, LCR and NSFR at 100%.
    • **Pillar 2Supervisory review via ICAAP and stress testing.
    • **Pillar 3Standardized disclosures for RWA comparability and leverage. No formal certification; enforced through national laws.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Banks implement for mandatory compliance in jurisdictions, reducing systemic risk, enhancing loss absorption, constraining leverage, and improving market discipline. Benefits include greater resilience, better funding costs, and strategic balance-sheet optimization amid supervisory scrutiny.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data architecture upgrades, model constraints, governance setup. Targets internationally active banks globally; involves ongoing reporting, disclosures, and supervisory interactions. (178 words)

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF) is the Saudi Central Bank's mandatory regulatory framework for cybersecurity in financial institutions. It provides a principle-based, risk-driven approach aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and Basel standards, mandating minimum Maturity Level 3 across all regulated entities.

    Key Components

    • Four core domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third Party Cyber Security.
    • 114+ sub-controls organized into subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations.
    • Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model (0: Non-existent to 5: Adaptive), requiring structured policies, standards, procedures, KPIs, KRIs, and continuous improvement.
    • Self-assessments and SAMA audits for compliance verification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for banks, insurers, financing firms, credit bureaus, and fintechs to avoid fines, license risks, and reputational damage.
    • Enhances resilience, enables multi-framework reuse, and supports Vision 2030 digital goals.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through board accountability and proven incident reduction.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: gap analysis, governance setup, control deployment, monitoring.
    • Targets mid-to-large financial firms in Saudi Arabia; 6-12 months typical.
    • No external certification; relies on periodic self-assessments and SAMA reviews.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Basel III
    Bank capital, leverage, liquidity, disclosures
    SAMA CSF
    Cybersecurity governance, risk, operations, third-party

    Industry

    Basel III
    Global banking sector
    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial institutions only

    Nature

    Basel III
    Global prudential standard, implemented nationally
    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory Saudi regulatory framework

    Testing

    Basel III
    Pillar 2 supervisory review, stress tests
    SAMA CSF
    Self-assessments, maturity model audits

    Penalties

    Basel III
    Supervisory actions, capital restrictions
    SAMA CSF
    Fines, license restrictions, enforcement

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Basel III and SAMA CSF

    Basel III FAQ

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages