Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards
SAMA CSF
Saudi Central Bank's cybersecurity framework for financial sector
Quick Verdict
Basel III strengthens global bank capital, leverage, and liquidity resilience, while SAMA CSF mandates Saudi financial cybersecurity maturity. Banks adopt Basel for solvency; Saudi firms use SAMA for cyber compliance and audits.
Basel III
Basel III global regulatory framework for banks
Key Features
- Elevates CET1 capital minimum to 4.5% of RWA
- Adds 2.5% capital conservation buffer with restrictions
- Introduces 3% non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
- Mandates 100% LCR for 30-day liquidity stress
- Requires 100% NSFR for one-year funding stability
SAMA CSF
SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0
Key Features
- Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model
- Four core domains with 114+ sub-controls
- Board-level governance and independent CISO
- Principle-based risk management approach
- Third-party cybersecurity requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the post-GFC global regulatory framework by the BCBS for bank prudential standards. It strengthens capital quality and quantity, introduces leverage constraints, and mandates liquidity buffers to address crisis vulnerabilities. The approach combines risk-weighted assets with simple non-risk-based metrics for comprehensive resilience.
Key Components
- **Pillar 1Capital ratios (CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total 8% of RWA), buffers (conservation 2.5%, countercyclical, G-SIB), leverage ratio 3%, LCR and NSFR at 100%.
- **Pillar 2Supervisory review via ICAAP and stress testing.
- **Pillar 3Standardized disclosures for RWA comparability and leverage. No formal certification; enforced through national laws.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks implement for mandatory compliance in jurisdictions, reducing systemic risk, enhancing loss absorption, constraining leverage, and improving market discipline. Benefits include greater resilience, better funding costs, and strategic balance-sheet optimization amid supervisory scrutiny.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data architecture upgrades, model constraints, governance setup. Targets internationally active banks globally; involves ongoing reporting, disclosures, and supervisory interactions. (178 words)
SAMA CSF Details
What It Is
SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF) is the Saudi Central Bank's mandatory regulatory framework for cybersecurity in financial institutions. It provides a principle-based, risk-driven approach aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and Basel standards, mandating minimum Maturity Level 3 across all regulated entities.
Key Components
- Four core domains: Cyber Security Leadership and Governance, Risk Management and Compliance, Operations and Technology, Third Party Cyber Security.
- 114+ sub-controls organized into subdomains with principles, objectives, and control considerations.
- Six-level Cyber Security Maturity Model (0: Non-existent to 5: Adaptive), requiring structured policies, standards, procedures, KPIs, KRIs, and continuous improvement.
- Self-assessments and SAMA audits for compliance verification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for banks, insurers, financing firms, credit bureaus, and fintechs to avoid fines, license risks, and reputational damage.
- Enhances resilience, enables multi-framework reuse, and supports Vision 2030 digital goals.
- Builds stakeholder trust through board accountability and proven incident reduction.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, governance setup, control deployment, monitoring.
- Targets mid-to-large financial firms in Saudi Arabia; 6-12 months typical.
- No external certification; relies on periodic self-assessments and SAMA reviews.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Basel III | SAMA CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity, disclosures | Cybersecurity governance, risk, operations, third-party |
| Industry | Global banking sector | Saudi financial institutions only |
| Nature | Global prudential standard, implemented nationally | Mandatory Saudi regulatory framework |
| Testing | Pillar 2 supervisory review, stress tests | Self-assessments, maturity model audits |
| Penalties | Supervisory actions, capital restrictions | Fines, license restrictions, enforcement |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Basel III and SAMA CSF
Basel III FAQ
SAMA CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMI vs FedRAMP
Compare CMMI vs FedRAMP: Process maturity drives software predictability; FedRAMP ensures federal cloud security. Boost compliance, cut risks, win contracts—discover key differences now!
CMMC vs UAE PDPL
Compare CMMC vs UAE PDPL: Decode DoD cybersecurity tiers (NIST 800-171) & UAE data privacy rules. Master compliance for defense & global ops. Key insights await!
OSHA vs ISO 14001
Compare OSHA vs ISO 14001: US workplace safety meets global EMS standards. Discover compliance gaps, risk controls & strategies for peak EHS performance. Elevate your program now!