BRC
Global standard for food safety in manufacturing and packing
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
BRC ensures food safety certification for global manufacturers via audits and HACCP, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial firms with MFA, risk assessments, and 72-hour reporting. Food firms adopt BRC for retailer access; financials comply to avoid fines.
BRC
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9
Key Features
- Prescriptive site standards for building fabric and hygiene
- Annual third-party audits with AA/A/B grading system
- GFSI-benchmarked for global retailer supply chain acceptance
- HACCP-based food safety plan with robust PRPs
- Unannounced audit option promoting daily operational readiness
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500
Key Features
- CEO/CISO dual annual compliance certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification
- Phishing-resistant MFA for high-risk access
- TPSP contracts with MFA/encryption clauses
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BRC Details
What It Is
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 is a prescriptive, GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures safe, legal, and authentic products through detailed site controls, HACCP plans, and operational rigor, targeting retail supply chains globally.
Key Components
- Nine core clauses: senior management commitment, HACCP food safety plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process control, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
- Fundamental requirements like internal audits, traceability, allergen management.
- Built on Codex HACCP principles with PRPs; annual third-party audits yield AA/A/B grades.
Why Organizations Use It
Provides retailer acceptance, reduces audit duplication, mitigates recall risks from pathogens/allergens. Enhances efficiency (5-12% OPEX savings), builds consumer trust, unlocks private-label markets. Voluntary but often contractually required.
Implementation Overview
Phased roadmap: gap analysis, remediation (Section 4 priorities), training (ATP/TTT), mock audits. Suits SMEs (via START) to multinationals; 6-12 months typical; requires certification body audits.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a mandatory state regulation for financial services entities. Its primary purpose is safeguarding nonpublic information (NPI) and ensuring operational resilience against cyber threats. It employs a risk-based yet prescriptive approach, requiring evidence-based outcomes via governance, controls, and reporting.
Key Components
- 14 core requirements: cybersecurity program, CISO governance, risk assessments, MFA, encryption, access privileges, TPSP oversight, pen testing, incident response, and annual certification.
- Anchored in annual Risk Assessments using frameworks like NIST CSF or CRI Profile.
- Dual CEO/CISO certification annually by April 15, with 5-year record retention; enhanced for Class A companies (e.g., >$20M NY revenue).
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for NY-licensed banks, insurers, avoiding multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Strengthens governance, vendor management, incident readiness.
- Boosts resilience, insurance premiums, stakeholder trust in competitive financial markets.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: gap analysis, asset inventory, control deployment (MFA rollout), testing, evidence repository.
- Targets NY financial entities (scalable by size); DFS examinations, no third-party certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | BRC | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Food safety, site standards, HACCP, PRPs | Cybersecurity program, risk assessment, MFA, encryption |
| Industry | Food manufacturing, packaging, global retailers | NY financial services, banks, insurers |
| Nature | Voluntary GFSI certification standard | Mandatory state regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Annual on-site audits, internal mocks | Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans |
| Penalties | Certification loss, market access denial | Multi-million fines, consent orders |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BRC and 23 NYCRR 500
BRC FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs GDPR UK
Explore ISO 37001 vs GDPR UK: Compare anti-bribery systems with data protection rules. Uncover risk mitigation, leadership & compliance synergies for robust governance. Act now!
CMMC vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Explore CMMC vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023—DoD cybersecurity tiers meet AI governance std. Key diffs in scoping, assessments, compliance for DIB/AI risks. Optimize now!
NIST 800-53 vs Australian Privacy Act
Discover NIST 800-53 vs Australian Privacy Act: Compare 20 control families, baselines & APPs for compliance. Expert insights on gaps, implementation & risk strategies. Elevate your security now!