BREEAM
Global sustainability certification for built environment performance
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security capability.
Quick Verdict
BREEAM certifies sustainable buildings globally via credits and ratings, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security for Australian financial entities. Developers pursue BREEAM for market value; banks adopt CPS 234 to avoid regulatory penalties and ensure resilience.
BREEAM
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method
Key Features
- Third-party certification by BRE Global with licensed assessors
- Weighted credits across 10 core sustainability categories
- Tailored schemes for new construction, in-use, infrastructure
- Dynamic Knowledge Base updates via compliance notes
- V7 alignment to whole-life carbon and EU Taxonomy
APRA CPS 234
Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour notification for material incidents to APRA
- Commensurate controls based on asset criticality/sensitivity
- Systematic independent testing and assurance program
- Third-party capability assessment and obligations
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BREEAM Details
What It Is
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a mature, science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it evaluates performance across lifecycles using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology, yielding ratings from Pass (≥30%) to Outstanding (≥85%).
Key Components
- **10 core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation
- Credits via evidenced compliance in scheme-specific manuals (e.g., New Construction V7)
- **Third-party assuranceLicensed assessors submit for BRE Global audits under ISO/IEC 17065
- Continuous updates through Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs)
Why Organizations Use It
- Achieves operational savings (22-33% energy reductions), asset premiums (up to 30% sales uplift)
- Supports ESG reporting, EU Taxonomy alignment, net-zero goals
- Mitigates regulatory, climate risks; enhances tenant appeal, market differentiation
- Builds investor trust via independently verified benchmarks
Implementation Overview
- **Phased processEarly assessor appointment, pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, post-occupancy via In-Use
- Applies globally to buildings/infrastructure; voluntary yet incentivized by planning/finance
- Requires evidence rigor, training; modest capex uplift with quick ROI
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, effective 1 July 2019. It mandates APRA-regulated entities like banks, insurers, and super funds to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. Its risk-based approach emphasizes governance, controls, and assurance.
Key Components
- **Governance and rolesBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles for management.
- **Core requirementsAsset classification, commensurate controls, systematic testing, internal audit assurance.
- **Incident management72-hour notification for material incidents, 10-day for control weaknesses.
- No fixed controls; proportionality based on criticality/sensitivity. Compliance via evidence, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for APRA entities to avoid penalties, enforcement.
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident impact, builds trust.
- Strategic benefits: operational continuity, better vendor terms, competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy development, asset register, controls, testing, monitoring. Applies to all sizes in Australian financial sector; requires ongoing assurance, third-party assessments. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | BREEAM | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Sustainability, energy, health, ecology in built environment | Information security, cyber resilience for financial assets |
| Industry | Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary certification scheme with ratings | Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | Assessor-led audits, evidence review by BRE | Systematic independent testing, internal audit assurance |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Fines, supervisory actions, license restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BREEAM and APRA CPS 234
BREEAM FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs J-SOX
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs J-SOX: Master electronic records/signatures for FDA trust & Japan's ICFR. Unlock risk-based strategies, controls & compliance tips. Boost audits—read now!
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs GRI
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs GRI: Decode electronic records/signature rules vs sustainability impacts. Master HES compliance, controls & strategies. Expert insights await!
PRINCE2 vs CSA
PRINCE2 vs CSA: Compare PRINCE2's 7 principles, practices & processes for controlled projects vs CSA's hazard ID & risk standards. Optimize governance & safety—discover now!