BREEAM
World-leading certification framework for built environment sustainability
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
Quick Verdict
BREEAM certifies sustainable buildings for construction firms seeking ESG value, while ISO 13485 mandates QMS rigor for medical device makers ensuring safety and regulatory compliance. Companies adopt BREEAM for market edge, ISO 13485 for market access.
BREEAM
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method
Key Features
- Third-party audited certification by BRE Global
- Category-weighted credit scoring to ratings
- Suite of schemes across asset lifecycles
- Continuous updates via Knowledge Base KBCNs
- Alignment with net-zero and EU Taxonomy
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS controls for device lifecycle
- Design and development validation requirements
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
- Traceability and medical device file mandates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
BREEAM Details
What It Is
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses environmental, health, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology producing ratings from Pass to Outstanding.
Key Components
- Core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
- Credits awarded for issue compliance, weighted by impact, with third-party assurance via licensed assessors and BRE audits.
- Schemes for lifecycles: New Construction, In-Use, Refurbishment, Infrastructure.
- Supported by technical manuals and KBCNs for updates.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives ESG compliance, net-zero alignment, asset value uplift (up to 30%), energy savings (22-33%), and market differentiation. Mitigates regulatory risks, enhances tenant appeal, and builds investor trust through verified performance.
Implementation Overview
Embed early via assessor appointment; multi-stage process (design, construction, post-occupancy). Applies globally to all sizes; requires evidence submission for BRE certification. In-Use valid 3 years.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a risk-based framework for organizations to demonstrate consistent provision of safe medical devices across their lifecycle, from design to post-market surveillance.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8 covering QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
- Emphasizes documented processes, validation, traceability, and regulatory integration.
- Built on process approach with exclusions allowed for non-applicable activities like design controls.
- Certification via accredited bodies through staged audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (e.g., EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
- Mitigates risks of recalls and non-compliance.
- Builds stakeholder trust and supply chain credibility.
- Drives operational efficiency and continual improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally.
- Requires executive commitment and eQMS tools for scalability.
Key Differences
| Aspect | BREEAM | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Sustainability in built environment across lifecycle | QMS for medical device lifecycle and safety |
| Industry | Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally | Medical devices, healthcare supply chain worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary third-party certification scheme | Regulatory-purpose QMS certification standard |
| Testing | Licensed assessor audits, BRE quality assurance | Internal audits, certification body stage audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Regulatory non-compliance, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about BREEAM and ISO 13485
BREEAM FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025
Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
J-SOX vs FSSC 22000
Explore J-SOX vs FSSC 22000: Japan's ICFR rules vs global food safety certification. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & risk insights for executives. Master both now!
WELL vs ISO 50001
Compare WELL vs ISO 50001: WELL prioritizes occupant health via 10 concepts & onsite verification, while ISO 50001 optimizes energy via PDCA & EnPIs. Pick your path to sustainable buildings. Dive in!
Six Sigma vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Discover Six Sigma vs MLPS 2.0: Data-driven excellence meets cybersecurity compliance. Compare methodologies, uncover synergies for enterprise strategy. Optimize now!