GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/BREEAM vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Standards Comparison

    BREEAM vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    World-leading certification framework for sustainable built environment

    VS

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection framework

    Quick Verdict

    BREEAM drives voluntary sustainability certification for global buildings, enhancing value and ESG compliance. MLPS 2.0 mandates cybersecurity grading for China networks, enforced by police with fines for breaches. Companies adopt BREEAM for market edge, MLPS for legal survival.

    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Third-party BRE audited certification process
    • Weighted category credits for holistic scoring
    • Lifecycle schemes: new, in-use, infrastructure
    • Global adaptability with national scheme operators
    • Continuous KBCN updates for evolving compliance
    Standard

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based system classification
    • Mandatory PSB registration and approval for Level 2+
    • Third-party audits with 70/100 passing score
    • Extended controls for cloud, IoT, big data
    • Law enforcement oversight and periodic re-evaluations

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment. Developed by BRE in 1990, it assesses environmental, social, and resilience performance across buildings, infrastructure, and communities. Its credit-based, weighted scoring methodology converts performance into ratings from Pass to Outstanding.

    Key Components

    • Core categories: Management, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation (10 main domains).
    • Hundreds of credits with prerequisites, evidence requirements, and Knowledge Base Compliance Notes (KBCNs) for updates.
    • Schemes for lifecycles: New Construction, In-Use, Refurbishment, Infrastructure.
    • Licensed assessor submissions audited by BRE Global under ISO/IEC 17065.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives ESG alignment, net-zero strategies, and EU Taxonomy compliance. Offers asset value uplift (up to 30%), energy savings (22-33%), and risk mitigation. Builds investor trust via third-party verification; enhances market differentiation and tenant appeal.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: early assessor appointment, pre-assessment, evidence gathering tied to design stages, BRE QA. Applies to all sizes/projects globally with local adaptations. Requires licensed professionals, robust documentation; certification valid 3 years for In-Use.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law (Article 21). It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, implementing graded technical, organizational, and governance controls.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, and governance.
    • Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define baselines; extensions for cloud, IoT, big data.
    • Built on impact-based classification; compliance via third-party audits (70/100 score) and PSB approval for Level 2+.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for all China-based networks; non-compliance risks fines, suspensions.
    • Enhances resilience, supports market access, aligns with data laws (DSL, PIPL).
    • Builds regulator trust, reduces breach risks, enables competitive edge in critical sectors.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing re-evaluations.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries in China; Level 2+ needs licensed audits, PSB filing.

    Key Differences

    AspectBREEAMMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    ScopeSustainability in built environment (energy, health, ecology)Cybersecurity for networks and information systems
    IndustryConstruction, real estate, infrastructure globallyAll network operators in mainland China
    NatureVoluntary third-party certificationMandatory legal regime enforced by police
    TestingAssessor-led audits, BRE quality assuranceThird-party security reviews, PSB approvals
    PenaltiesLoss of certification, no legal finesFines, operational suspension, inspections

    Scope

    BREEAM
    Sustainability in built environment (energy, health, ecology)
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Cybersecurity for networks and information systems

    Industry

    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All network operators in mainland China

    Nature

    BREEAM
    Voluntary third-party certification
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory legal regime enforced by police

    Testing

    BREEAM
    Assessor-led audits, BRE quality assurance
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Third-party security reviews, PSB approvals

    Penalties

    BREEAM
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, operational suspension, inspections

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about BREEAM and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    BREEAM FAQ

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

    Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

    Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

    Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

    The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

    The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

    Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how BREEAM and MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) compare against other standards

    Other BREEAM Comparisons

    • WEEE vs BREEAM
    • COBIT vs BREEAM
    • BREEAM vs ISO 28000
    • TOGAF vs BREEAM
    • BREEAM vs ISO 30301

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • ISO 55001 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • RoHS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • CAA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • GMP vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • ISO 45001 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved