CAA
U.S. federal law for air quality standards and emissions control
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems
Quick Verdict
CAA mandates US air quality compliance via emissions standards and permits for all industries, while ISO 13485 provides voluntary QMS certification for medical device makers ensuring lifecycle safety. Organizations adopt CAA to avoid penalties; ISO 13485 for market access and quality.
CAA
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq.)
Key Features
- Sets NAAQS for six criteria pollutants nationwide
- Mandates SIPs under cooperative federalism model
- Imposes NSPS/MACT technology-forcing emission standards
- Requires Title V permits consolidating requirements
- Enables acid rain SO2 cap-and-trade trading
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS controls for device lifecycle
- Design development and validation requirements
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Supplier and outsourcing process controls
- Medical device files and traceability
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CAA Details
What It Is
Clean Air Act (CAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. §7401 et seq., is the primary U.S. federal statute regulating air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. Its purpose is protecting public health/welfare via ambient standards and source controls. It employs **cooperative federalismEPA sets national floors; states implement via SIPs.
Key Components
- NAAQS for six criteria pollutants (primary/secondary standards).
- Technology standards: NSPS (§111), MACT/NESHAPs (§112).
- Title V operating permits; NSR/PSD preconstruction review.
- Titles II (mobile), IV (acid rain trading), VI (ozone protection). Built on ambient outcomes + source controls + enforcement; no formal certification but federally enforceable permits/SIPs.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory compliance avoids penalties, sanctions, citizen suits. Drives emission reductions, risk management, ESG benefits. Enables permitting agility, market access; strategic for capital planning in nonattainment areas.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, permitting (Title V/NSR), controls/monitoring (CEMS), reporting (CEDRI/ECMPS). Applies to major emitters across industries; state variations. Ongoing audits, SIP tracking; no central certification.
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the medical device lifecycle, emphasizing risk-based controls to ensure devices meet customer and regulatory requirements consistently.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
- Covers ~20 main requirements with documented procedures, records, validation, and traceability.
- Built on process approach, integrated with ISO 14971 for risk management.
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026).
- Reduces risks like recalls via validation and post-market surveillance.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supplier credibility, and operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers globally; scales by size.
- Requires certification audits, ongoing surveillance (179 words).
Key Differences
| Aspect | CAA | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Air emissions standards, NAAQS, permits, enforcement | Medical device QMS, lifecycle, risk management |
| Industry | All industries with air emissions, US-focused | Medical device manufacturers, global |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law, enforceable | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | CEMS, stack tests, Title V audits | Process validation, internal audits, certification |
| Penalties | Fines, sanctions, shutdowns, criminal | Certification loss, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CAA and ISO 13485
CAA FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c
Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9100 vs C-TPAT
AS9100 vs C-TPAT: Compare aerospace QMS standards with CBP supply chain security. Discover key differences, benefits, implementation tips for compliance success. Optimize now!
GLBA vs ISO 17025
Compare GLBA vs ISO 17025: Financial privacy rules meet lab competence standards. Discover key differences, compliance tips & risks to safeguard data. Read now!
Six Sigma vs AS9100
Compare Six Sigma vs AS9100: DMAIC methodology vs aerospace QMS standards. Discover key differences, benefits, and paths to certification for peak quality. Explore now!