CCPA
California regulation granting consumers data privacy rights
COPPA
U.S. regulation protecting children under 13 from online data collection.
Quick Verdict
CCPA grants California residents rights to know, delete, and opt-out of personal data sales, while COPPA mandates parental consent for collecting kids under 13 data online. Companies adopt CCPA for CA compliance and trust; COPPA to avoid massive FTC fines.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Consumer rights to know, delete, correct personal data
- Opt-out of sales/sharing via GPC signals mandatory
- Applies to businesses over revenue/data thresholds globally
- Fines up to $7,500 per intentional violation enforced
- Private right of action for unencrypted data breaches
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Verifiable parental consent before collecting child data under 13
- Expansive personal info definition including geolocation and device IDs
- Mandatory privacy notices and data security requirements
- Parental rights to review, delete, and revoke child data
- FTC enforcement with up to $43,792 civil penalties per violation
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a state regulation establishing consumer privacy rights for California residents. It targets for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling 100K+ consumers' data. Primary purpose: empower consumers with control over personal information (PI) via rights-based approach including opt-out of sales/sharing.
Key Components
- Core rights: know/access, delete, correct, opt-out sales/sharing, limit sensitive PI use
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, DSAR handling within 45 days, GPC honoring
- Enforcement by CPPA with $2,500-$7,500 fines per violation; private breach actions
- No certification; compliance via audits, data mapping, vendor contracts
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for applicable businesses to avoid fines, litigation, reputational harm. Drives data governance efficiency, trust-building, market differentiation. Aligns with GDPR-like regimes for scalability.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/training, ongoing audits. Applies globally to CA data handlers; cross-functional effort.
COPPA Details
What It Is
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation, enacted in 1998 and effective 2000, enforced by the FTC. It safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized personal data collection by operators of commercial websites, apps, and services directed to kids or with actual knowledge of their age. Its control-based approach mandates parental oversight.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent (VPC) before collecting, using, or disclosing data
- Broad personal information definition: names, geolocation, persistent IDs, audio/video
- Privacy notices, data minimization, security safeguards
- Parental rights to access, review, delete, and revoke consent Built on 16 CFR Part 312; safe harbor self-regulatory programs.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for applicable operators to avoid $43,792 per-violation fines; reduces legal/reputation risks from cases like YouTube's $170M penalty. Enhances parental trust, supports ethical data practices in gaming/edtech.
Implementation Overview
Assess audience for child-directed content; deploy age screens, VPC methods (e.g., credit card, video calls), policies. Applies globally to U.S.-targeted services, all sizes. FTC audits; no certification but ongoing compliance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | COPPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer rights over personal data for CA residents | Child under 13 privacy on child-directed sites/services |
| Industry | All for-profit businesses meeting CA thresholds, global reach | Commercial websites/apps directed to children, US/global |
| Nature | Mandatory state regulation, CPPA/AG enforcement | Mandatory federal law, FTC enforcement |
| Testing | Internal audits, cybersecurity audits for large firms | No specific testing; compliance via safe harbors/audits |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, private breach actions | Up to $43,792 per violation, FTC civil penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and COPPA
CCPA FAQ
COPPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMC vs ISO 50001
CMMC vs ISO 50001: DoD cybersecurity maturity model meets global energy mgmt std. Compare levels, impl strategies, costs & benefits for compliance edge now!
GDPR UK vs ISO 41001
Compare GDPR UK vs ISO 41001: Key differences in data protection vs facility management standards. Discover compliance overlaps, strategies & best practices for integrated systems. Optimize now!
HITRUST CSF vs NIST 800-171
Compare HITRUST CSF vs NIST 800-171: Certifiable, threat-adaptive framework harmonizing 60+ standards vs CUI protection baseline for contractors. Unlock key differences, choose wisely for compliance. Dive in!