CCPA
California regulation granting residents rights over personal data
FedRAMP
U.S. government program standardizing cloud security authorization
Quick Verdict
CCPA grants California consumers data rights like know, delete, opt-out, enforced by fines; FedRAMP authorizes secure federal cloud via NIST controls and 3PAO audits. Companies adopt CCPA for CA compliance and FedRAMP to win government contracts.
CCPA
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA/CPRA)
Key Features
- Consumer rights to know, delete, opt-out, correct, limit sensitive PI
- Applies to businesses over $25M revenue or 100K CA consumers/devices
- Requires notices at collection and Do Not Sell/Share links
- Mandates Global Privacy Control (GPC) opt-out honoring
- Fines up to $7,500 per intentional violation plus breach lawsuits
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Key Features
- Assess once, use many times reusability
- NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baselines by impact level
- Independent 3PAO security assessments
- Continuous monitoring with monthly deliverables
- FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSPs
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CCPA Details
What It Is
The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), is a state regulation establishing consumer privacy rights for California residents. It applies to for-profit businesses meeting thresholds like $25M revenue or handling data of 100K+ consumers. Primary purpose: empower consumers with control over personal information (PI) via rights-based approach, including broad PI definitions covering households and inferences.
Key Components
- Core rights: know/access, delete, opt-out sales/sharing, correct, limit sensitive PI use
- Obligations: notices at collection, privacy policies, vendor contracts, GPC honoring
- Enforcement by CPPA and Attorney General with $2,500-$7,500 fines per violation
- Private right of action for breaches; no formal certification, but audits required
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for qualifying businesses to avoid fines, litigation, reputational damage. Drives data governance, efficiency, trust; aligns with GDPR; enables market differentiation and partnerships.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis (0-3 months), policies/contracts (1-4 months), technical controls (2-6 months), operationalization/training, ongoing audits. Targets data-heavy industries globally if CA ties; requires cross-functional teams, automation tools.
FedRAMP Details
What It Is
FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on risk-based NIST SP 800-53 controls mapped to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High).
Key Components
- Baselines with ~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls, plus LI-SaaS variant.
- Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
- Built on NIST 800-53 Rev 5; uses 3PAO independent assessments.
- Compliance via Agency or Program Authorizations, listed on Marketplace.
Why Organizations Use It
- Unlocks federal contracts worth $20M+; required for CMMC/federal procurement.
- Enhances risk management, competitive edge, commercial trust.
- Builds stakeholder confidence via rigorous, reusable security posture.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: categorization, documentation, 3PAO assessment, authorization, monitoring.
- Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal market; high resource needs.
- Audit by accredited 3PAOs; timelines 12-18 months typical.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CCPA | FedRAMP |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Consumer privacy rights and data handling | Cloud security assessment and authorization |
| Industry | Businesses meeting CA thresholds, global reach | Cloud providers serving US federal agencies |
| Nature | Mandatory state regulation with fines | Government authorization program, mandatory for federal |
| Testing | No formal audits, self-managed compliance | 3PAO assessments, annual reassessments |
| Penalties | $2,500-$7,500 per violation, private actions | Revocation of authorization, contract loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CCPA and FedRAMP
CCPA FAQ
FedRAMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!
Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ENERGY STAR vs ISO 26000
Discover ENERGY STAR vs ISO 26000: U.S. energy efficiency certification vs global social responsibility guidance. Cut costs, reduce emissions, boost sustainability—choose wisely!
AEO vs J-SOX
Compare AEO vs J-SOX: Global trade security (AEO) meets Japan's SOX-like financial controls. Discover key differences, benefits, and strategies for seamless compliance success. (152)
ISO 13485 vs ISO 27701
ISO 13485 vs ISO 27701: Medical device QMS vs privacy PIMS. Discover key differences, synergies in risk & compliance, and integration strategies for regulated success. Dive in!