CE Marking
EU marking for product conformity to harmonised legislation
CMMC
DoD certification for cybersecurity maturity in defense supply chain
Quick Verdict
CE Marking declares product conformity for EU market access, while CMMC certifies cybersecurity maturity for DoD contracts. Manufacturers adopt CE for free EEA trade; DIB firms pursue CMMC to win bids and protect sensitive data.
CE Marking
CE Marking (Conformité Européenne)
Key Features
- Manufacturer's legally binding conformity declaration
- Enables free product circulation in EEA
- OJEU harmonised standards presume conformity
- Risk-proportionate assessment modules A-H
- Requires 10-year technical documentation retention
CMMC
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0
Key Features
- Three cumulative levels aligned to FAR/NIST standards
- 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls at Level 2
- C3PAO third-party assessments for certification
- Mandatory flow-down to subcontractors via DFARS
- POA&Ms with strict 180-day closure timelines
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CE Marking Details
What It Is
CE Marking (Conformité Européenne) is the EU's primary product conformity marking framework. It serves as the manufacturer's declaration that products meet essential health, safety, and environmental requirements under harmonised EU legislation like the New Legislative Framework (NLF). Its risk-based approach scales conformity assessment from self-declaration to third-party notified body involvement.
Key Components
- Legislation mapping and essential requirements identification
- Conformity modules (A-H) for assessment
- Technical documentation, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), CE affixation
- Harmonised OJEU standards for presumption of conformity Self-assessment for low-risk; notified bodies for high-risk; 10-year retention.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EEA market access, preventing sales bans and fines. Enhances risk management, supply chain trust, and competitive edge via single-market scale. Builds stakeholder confidence through proven compliance.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scope analysis, risk assessment, testing/documentation, DoC issuance, marking. Applies to manufacturers across industries/geographies targeting EU/EEA. No central certification; audit-ready files for surveillance.
CMMC Details
What It Is
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) certification framework verifying cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) across the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered, risk-based model with three cumulative levels drawn from FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, and NIST SP 800-172.
Key Components
- **Three levelsLevel 1 (17 basic FAR safeguards), Level 2 (110 NIST 800-171 controls), Level 3 (+24 NIST 800-172 enhancements)
- 14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response, Risk Assessment)
- Assessments via self-assessment, C3PAO, or DIBCAC; System Security Plans (SSP) and POA&Ms
- Reporting to SPRS or eMASS
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for DoD contracts to ensure eligibility and avoid debarment
- Mitigates supply chain risks, reduces breach costs, enhances resilience
- Provides competitive advantage, primes' trust, market access
- Aligns with NIST for broader benefits
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gap analysis, remediation, assessment preparation, certification, sustainment. Applies to all DIB sizes handling FCI/CUI; requires evidence, training, continuous monitoring. Certifications valid 3 years with annual affirmations. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CE Marking | CMMC |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Product safety, health, environmental requirements | Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI protection |
| Industry | Manufacturers across EU/EEA product sectors | DoD contractors/subcontractors in DIB |
| Nature | Manufacturer self-declaration, mandatory for scope | Tiered certification, mandatory for contracts |
| Testing | Self-assessment or notified body, as required | Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years |
| Penalties | Product withdrawal, fines by Member States | Contract ineligibility, debarment |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CE Marking and CMMC
CE Marking FAQ
CMMC FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability
Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST CSF vs Basel III
NIST CSF vs Basel III: Compare cyber risk mastery with banking capital standards. Align frameworks for resilient finance ops & compliance. Discover key diffs now!
IEC 62443 vs CAA
IEC 62443 vs CAA: Compare IACS cybersecurity standards with Clean Air Act regs. Discover key differences, compliance strategies, and implementation tips for industrial ops. Secure compliance now!
ISO 27032 vs MAS TRM
Discover ISO 27032 vs MAS TRM: Compare global Internet cybersecurity guidelines with Singapore's financial tech risk standards. Key differences, compliance strategies, and implementation roadmap for resilient ops.