Standards Comparison

    CMMC

    Mandatory
    2021

    DoD certification verifying cybersecurity maturity in defense supply chain

    VS

    BREEAM

    Voluntary
    1990

    Global certification framework for sustainable built environment performance

    Quick Verdict

    CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting sensitive data, while BREEAM voluntarily certifies sustainable building performance. Defense firms adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; developers pursue BREEAM for value uplift, ESG credibility, and market differentiation.

    Cybersecurity Maturity

    CMMC

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Three cumulative levels aligning FAR and NIST controls
    • Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC certifications required
    • Mandatory flow-down to DIB subcontractors via DFARS
    • Limited POA&Ms with strict 180-day closure rules
    • SPRS annual affirmations ensuring ongoing compliance
    Building Sustainability

    BREEAM

    Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Credit-based scoring across 10 sustainability categories
    • Third-party BRE certification and quality audits
    • Adaptable schemes for buildings, infrastructure, communities
    • Weighted emphasis on energy, health, whole-life carbon
    • Continuous updates via Knowledge Base Compliance Notes

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CMMC Details

    What It Is

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 is a U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) certification framework ensuring cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered, risk-based model with three cumulative levels: Level 1 (basic FCI safeguards), Level 2 (NIST SP 800-171 for CUI), and Level 3 (NIST SP 800-172 enhancements against APTs).

    Key Components

    • 171 practices across 14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response)
    • Level 1: 17 FAR 52.204-21 practices; Level 2: 110 NIST controls; Level 3: +24 enhancements
    • Built on NIST SP 800-171/172 and FAR standards
    • Certification via self-assessments (Levels 1/2), C3PAO (Level 2), or DIBCAC (Level 3), with SPRS/eMASS reporting

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for DoD contractors/subcontractors handling FCI/CUI, preventing contract ineligibility. Reduces cyber risks, enhances supply chain trust, lowers incident costs, and provides competitive procurement advantages. Builds operational resilience and stakeholder confidence.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, remediation, assessment preparation, certification, sustainment. Applies to all DIB firms (SMEs to primes); requires System Security Plan (SSP), evidence artifacts, POA&Ms (limited), annual affirmations. Timelines: 12+ months for Level 2.

    BREEAM Details

    What It Is

    BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a science-led sustainability certification framework for the built environment, launched in 1990 by BRE. It assesses new construction, refurbishments, in-use assets, communities, and infrastructure using a credit-based, weighted scoring methodology producing ratings from Pass (≥30%) to Outstanding (≥85%).

    Key Components

    • **10 core categoriesManagement, Health & Wellbeing, Energy, Transport, Water, Materials, Waste, Land Use & Ecology, Pollution, Innovation.
    • Credits for compliant issues, category weightings prioritizing high-impact areas like energy.
    • Technical manuals, KBCNs, licensed assessors, BRE third-party audits under ISO/IEC 17065.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Operational savings (22-33% energy reduction), asset premiums (up to 30% sales uplift).
    • ESG alignment, EU Taxonomy support, regulatory incentives.
    • Risk mitigation for climate resilience, biodiversity; market differentiation, tenant appeal.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: pre-assessment, design integration, construction evidence, certification, in-use monitoring.
    • Early assessor/AP appointment essential; global applicability, all scales.
    • BRE QA certification required. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CMMC
    Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI protection
    BREEAM
    Sustainability across built environment lifecycle

    Industry

    CMMC
    Defense Industrial Base contractors
    BREEAM
    Construction, real estate, infrastructure globally

    Nature

    CMMC
    Mandatory DoD certification program
    BREEAM
    Voluntary third-party sustainability certification

    Testing

    CMMC
    Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years
    BREEAM
    Licensed assessor audits with BRE QA

    Penalties

    CMMC
    Contract ineligibility, debarment
    BREEAM
    No penalties, loss of certification/market access

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CMMC and BREEAM

    CMMC FAQ

    BREEAM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages