Standards Comparison

    CMMC

    Mandatory
    2021

    DoD certification framework protecting FCI and CUI

    VS

    ENERGY STAR

    Voluntary
    1992

    U.S. voluntary program certifying superior energy-efficient products and buildings

    Quick Verdict

    CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI, while ENERGY STAR voluntarily certifies energy-efficient products and buildings. Companies adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; ENERGY STAR for cost savings, incentives, and market differentiation.

    Cybersecurity Maturity

    CMMC

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Three cumulative levels for FCI, CUI, APT protection
    • Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments for verification
    • Mandatory flow-down to DoD supply chain subcontractors
    • SPRS reporting with annual affirmations required
    • NIST 800-171 aligned controls with POA&M limits
    Energy Efficiency

    ENERGY STAR

    ENERGY STAR Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory third-party certification and verification
    • Category-specific performance thresholds above minima
    • Standardized DOE test procedures for consistency
    • Ongoing post-market verification testing
    • Portfolio Manager for building benchmarking

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CMMC Details

    What It Is

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 is a U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) certification program ensuring cybersecurity protections for the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It verifies safeguards for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) via three tiered levels: Level 1 (basic FCI safeguarding), Level 2 (NIST SP 800-171 for CUI), and Level 3 (NIST SP 800-172 enhancements against APTs). The model employs risk-based scoping, mapping to FAR 52.204-21 and NIST standards.

    Key Components

    • 14 domains like Access Control and Incident Response with 17 (Level 1), 110 (Level 2), and 134 (Level 3) practices.
    • Cumulative structure requiring lower-level compliance.
    • Assessment scopes via self-assessments, C3PAO, or DIBCAC.
    • Limited POA&Ms closing in 180 days, reported to SPRS/eMASS.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for DoD contractors to secure contracts, reducing ineligibility risks. Enhances supply chain trust, operational resilience, and competitive bidding. Mitigates breaches, lowers costs, and builds prime/subcontractor confidence.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: governance, scoping/gap analysis, remediation, assessment preparation, certification, sustainment. Targets DIB primes/subcontractors handling FCI/CUI. Requires SSP development, evidence artifacts, annual affirmations, triennial recertification.

    ENERGY STAR Details

    What It Is

    ENERGY STAR is a voluntary U.S. government program administered by the EPA with DOE technical support. It certifies energy-efficient products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants. Primary purpose: drive market transformation for energy savings and emissions reductions via trusted labeling. Key approach: category-specific performance thresholds above federal minima, verified independently.

    Key Components

    • Performance thresholds (e.g., 15%+ efficiency for appliances, 75+ score for buildings)
    • Standardized DOE test procedures
    • Third-party certification by EPA-recognized labs/CBs
    • Ongoing verification testing (5-20% models annually)
    • Brand governance (mark usage rules) Built on voluntary partnership model; certification renewable annually for buildings.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Massive savings (5T kWh, $500B costs avoided since 1992)
    • Incentives/rebates, procurement advantages
    • Aligns with benchmarking laws
    • Builds reputation (90% consumer recognition)
    • Reduces risks, enhances ESG.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: assess/gap analysis, test/certify, deploy, monitor/verify. Suits manufacturers, owners across sizes/industries, U.S.-focused. Involves Portfolio Manager benchmarking, lab testing, third-party audits.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CMMC
    Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI in DoD contracts
    ENERGY STAR
    Energy efficiency for products/buildings/plants

    Industry

    CMMC
    Defense Industrial Base contractors
    ENERGY STAR
    All industries, manufacturers, building owners

    Nature

    CMMC
    Mandatory certification for DoD contracts
    ENERGY STAR
    Voluntary efficiency labeling/benchmarking

    Testing

    CMMC
    Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years
    ENERGY STAR
    Third-party lab testing + annual verification

    Penalties

    CMMC
    Contract ineligibility, debarment
    ENERGY STAR
    Label disqualification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CMMC and ENERGY STAR

    CMMC FAQ

    ENERGY STAR FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages