CMMC
DoD certification framework protecting FCI and CUI
ENERGY STAR
U.S. voluntary program certifying superior energy-efficient products and buildings
Quick Verdict
CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI, while ENERGY STAR voluntarily certifies energy-efficient products and buildings. Companies adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; ENERGY STAR for cost savings, incentives, and market differentiation.
CMMC
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0
Key Features
- Three cumulative levels for FCI, CUI, APT protection
- Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments for verification
- Mandatory flow-down to DoD supply chain subcontractors
- SPRS reporting with annual affirmations required
- NIST 800-171 aligned controls with POA&M limits
ENERGY STAR
ENERGY STAR Program
Key Features
- Mandatory third-party certification and verification
- Category-specific performance thresholds above minima
- Standardized DOE test procedures for consistency
- Ongoing post-market verification testing
- Portfolio Manager for building benchmarking
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CMMC Details
What It Is
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 is a U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) certification program ensuring cybersecurity protections for the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It verifies safeguards for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) via three tiered levels: Level 1 (basic FCI safeguarding), Level 2 (NIST SP 800-171 for CUI), and Level 3 (NIST SP 800-172 enhancements against APTs). The model employs risk-based scoping, mapping to FAR 52.204-21 and NIST standards.
Key Components
- 14 domains like Access Control and Incident Response with 17 (Level 1), 110 (Level 2), and 134 (Level 3) practices.
- Cumulative structure requiring lower-level compliance.
- Assessment scopes via self-assessments, C3PAO, or DIBCAC.
- Limited POA&Ms closing in 180 days, reported to SPRS/eMASS.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for DoD contractors to secure contracts, reducing ineligibility risks. Enhances supply chain trust, operational resilience, and competitive bidding. Mitigates breaches, lowers costs, and builds prime/subcontractor confidence.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance, scoping/gap analysis, remediation, assessment preparation, certification, sustainment. Targets DIB primes/subcontractors handling FCI/CUI. Requires SSP development, evidence artifacts, annual affirmations, triennial recertification.
ENERGY STAR Details
What It Is
ENERGY STAR is a voluntary U.S. government program administered by the EPA with DOE technical support. It certifies energy-efficient products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants. Primary purpose: drive market transformation for energy savings and emissions reductions via trusted labeling. Key approach: category-specific performance thresholds above federal minima, verified independently.
Key Components
- Performance thresholds (e.g., 15%+ efficiency for appliances, 75+ score for buildings)
- Standardized DOE test procedures
- Third-party certification by EPA-recognized labs/CBs
- Ongoing verification testing (5-20% models annually)
- Brand governance (mark usage rules) Built on voluntary partnership model; certification renewable annually for buildings.
Why Organizations Use It
- Massive savings (5T kWh, $500B costs avoided since 1992)
- Incentives/rebates, procurement advantages
- Aligns with benchmarking laws
- Builds reputation (90% consumer recognition)
- Reduces risks, enhances ESG.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess/gap analysis, test/certify, deploy, monitor/verify. Suits manufacturers, owners across sizes/industries, U.S.-focused. Involves Portfolio Manager benchmarking, lab testing, third-party audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CMMC | ENERGY STAR |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI in DoD contracts | Energy efficiency for products/buildings/plants |
| Industry | Defense Industrial Base contractors | All industries, manufacturers, building owners |
| Nature | Mandatory certification for DoD contracts | Voluntary efficiency labeling/benchmarking |
| Testing | Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years | Third-party lab testing + annual verification |
| Penalties | Contract ineligibility, debarment | Label disqualification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CMMC and ENERGY STAR
CMMC FAQ
ENERGY STAR FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
Six Sigma vs IFS Food
Compare Six Sigma vs IFS Food: data-driven DMAIC meets rigorous food safety audits. Discover key differences, benefits & implementation for peak compliance. Optimize now!
ISO 27001 vs UL Certification
ISO 27001 vs UL Certification: ISO builds resilient ISMS for info security risks; UL tests products for safety hazards. Key differences, benefits & compliance guide—choose wisely!
PCI DSS vs ISO 27017
PCI DSS vs ISO 27017: Compare payment card security (12 reqs) with cloud controls (7 CLD). Key diffs in scope, shared resp, compliance. Choose right framework now!