Standards Comparison

    CMMC

    Mandatory
    2021

    DoD certification framework safeguarding FCI and CUI

    VS

    ISA 95

    Voluntary
    2000

    International standard for enterprise-control system integration.

    Quick Verdict

    CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI via tiered assessments, while ISA 95 provides voluntary models for manufacturing-ERP integration. Organizations adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; ISA 95 for seamless operations and data consistency.

    Cybersecurity Maturity

    CMMC

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Tiered levels matching FCI, CUI, APT protections
    • Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments
    • 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls verification
    • DFARS flow-down to supply chain subcontractors
    • 180-day POA&M remediation with scoping enclaves
    Enterprise-Control Integration

    ISA 95

    ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Purdue levels 0-4 for system boundaries and interfaces
    • Object models for equipment, materials, personnel semantics
    • Activity models defining manufacturing operations management
    • Standardized transactions for ERP-MES information exchange
    • Alias services mapping equivalent identifiers across systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CMMC Details

    What It Is

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 is a DoD certification program verifying cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered, risk-based model with three cumulative levels to ensure appropriate safeguards against escalating threats.

    Key Components

    • **Three levelsLevel 1 (17 FAR 52.204-21 practices), Level 2 (110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 controls), Level 3 (+24 NIST SP 800-172 enhancements)
    • 14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response)
    • Assessment via self, C3PAO, or DIBCAC; SPRS/eMASS reporting
    • POA&Ms limited to 180 days

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for DoD contracts; prevents ineligibility
    • Reduces breach risks, enhances resilience
    • Builds supply chain trust, competitive edge
    • Lowers insurance, audit costs

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, remediation, assessment. Targets DIB contractors/subcontractors; 12-18 months typical. Requires SSP, evidence artifacts, annual affirmations.

    ISA 95 Details

    What It Is

    ISA-95 (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264) is an international framework standard for integrating enterprise business systems like ERP with manufacturing operations and control systems like MES and SCADA. Its primary purpose is to define consistent information models, hierarchies, and exchanges across the Purdue levels (0-4), focusing on the Level 3-4 interface using activity, object, and transaction models.

    Key Components

    • Hierarchical levels (0-4) and equipment models (Enterprise > Site > Area > Unit)
    • Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8)
    • Core principles: semantic consistency, boundary definition, tech-agnostic exchanges
    • Compliance via alignment, no formal product certification but training certificates

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces integration costs, errors, and risks in IT/OT convergence
    • Enables data governance, OEE, traceability for regulated industries
    • Supports Industry 4.0, cybersecurity segmentation, scalable architectures
    • Builds stakeholder trust through shared vocabulary and auditable interfaces

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: assessment, modeling, pilot, rollout with governance
    • Key activities: canonical data models, alias mapping, transaction design
    • Applies to manufacturing (discrete/batch/continuous), any size
    • No mandatory audits; self-assessed via models and KPIs (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CMMC
    Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI protection
    ISA 95
    Enterprise-manufacturing system integration

    Industry

    CMMC
    Defense Industrial Base contractors
    ISA 95
    Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process

    Nature

    CMMC
    Mandatory DoD certification program
    ISA 95
    Voluntary integration reference architecture

    Testing

    CMMC
    Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years
    ISA 95
    No formal certification; internal validation

    Penalties

    CMMC
    Contract ineligibility, debarment
    ISA 95
    No penalties; integration risks/costs

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CMMC and ISA 95

    CMMC FAQ

    ISA 95 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages