CMMC
DoD certification framework for DIB cybersecurity maturity
ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification.
Quick Verdict
CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI, while ISO 14064 provides voluntary GHG accounting standards for organizations worldwide. Companies adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; ISO 14064 for credible emissions reporting and sustainability goals.
CMMC
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)
Key Features
- Three tiered levels aligning FAR/NIST for FCI/CUI protection
- Third-party C3PAO assessments ensuring verified compliance
- 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls across 14 domains
- Mandatory flow-down to DIB supply chain subcontractors
- POA&Ms limited to 180-day closure timelines
ISO 14064
ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases
Key Features
- Three-part modular structure for GHG inventories, projects, assurance
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Organizational boundaries with equity/operational control approaches
- Scope 1-3 emissions categorization and quantification methods
- Risk-based validation/verification under ISO 14064-3
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CMMC Details
What It Is
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a DoD program and certification framework verifying cybersecurity protections in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It safeguards Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) via a tiered model. The cumulative, risk-based approach maps requirements from FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, and NIST SP 800-172, with phased rollout effective December 2024.
Key Components
- Three levels: Level 1 (17 FAR practices), Level 2 (110 NIST 800-171 across 14 domains like AC, IA, SI), Level 3 (+24 NIST 800-172 enhancements)
- Assessments: self-assessments (SPRS), C3PAO (eMASS), DIBCAC; SSPs, POA&Ms (180-day limits)
- Built on NIST standards; annual affirmations, triennial recertification
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for DoD contracts to qualify for awards and flow-down
- Mitigates supply chain risks, reduces incidents, avoids debarment
- Provides competitive bid advantage, operational resilience
- Builds trust with primes, lowers insurance costs
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, scoping/gaps, remediation, assessment, sustainment
- Targets DIB primes/subcontractors handling FCI/CUI; enclaves possible
- 6-12 months typical; high costs ($100K+ for SMEs); C3PAO/DIBCAC audits required for Levels 2/3
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. It adopts a modular, principle-based approach focusing on organizational inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3).
Key Components
- Three interdependent parts forming a lifecycle from measurement to assurance.
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
- Scope 1-3 categorization, boundary setting, uncertainty management.
- Compliance via third-party verification under Part 3; no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables credible reporting for regulations like CSRD, SB-253.
- Builds stakeholder trust, supports carbon markets, green finance.
- Drives operational efficiencies, risk reduction, competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, boundary design, data systems, verification.
- Suited for all sizes/industries; complex Scope 3 needs more effort.
- Optional but recommended independent assurance per ISO 14064-3.
Key Differences
| Aspect | CMMC | ISO 14064 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI protection | GHG emissions quantification and reporting |
| Industry | Defense Industrial Base contractors | All sectors with GHG footprints |
| Nature | Mandatory DoD certification program | Voluntary international standard |
| Testing | Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments every 3 years | Optional third-party validation/verification |
| Penalties | Contract ineligibility and debarment | No legal penalties, reputational risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CMMC and ISO 14064
CMMC FAQ
ISO 14064 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve
One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug
Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention
Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
HIPAA vs CAA
Discover HIPAA vs CAA: HIPAA protects PHI privacy via Security Rule & Breach Notification; CAA enforces NAAQS/SIPs for clean air compliance. Expert insights inside!
AEO vs ISO 20000
Discover AEO vs ISO 20000: Customs security cert (AEO) for faster trade vs IT service mgmt std (ISO 20000) for ops excellence. Key diffs, benefits & tips inside!
IFS Food vs ISO 22301
Discover IFS Food vs ISO 22301: Compare GFSI food safety audits with BCM resilience. Boost compliance, cut risks for manufacturers. Read insights now!