Standards Comparison

    CMMC

    Mandatory
    2021

    DoD certification verifying cybersecurity maturity for FCI and CUI

    VS

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting sensitive data, while ISO 22000 provides voluntary food safety management for global food chain organizations. Companies adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; ISO 22000 for market access and hazard control.

    Cybersecurity Maturity

    CMMC

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Three cumulative certification levels aligning to FCI, CUI, APTs
    • Third-party C3PAO and DIBCAC assessments beyond self-attestation
    • Direct mapping to NIST 800-171/172 and FAR 52.204-21 controls
    • Mandatory flow-down requirements across DoD supply chains
    • POA&Ms limited to 180-day closures for remediation
    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
    • Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
    • Hazard analysis with CCPs and OPRPs categorization
    • Prerequisite programs establishing hygiene baseline
    • Interactive communication across food chain

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CMMC Details

    What It Is

    Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a DoD certification program verifying cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered model with three cumulative levels: Level 1 for basic FCI safeguards, Level 2 for CUI via NIST SP 800-171, and Level 3 for APT defenses adding NIST SP 800-172. The approach emphasizes scoping, evidence-based assessments, and supply chain flow-down.

    Key Components

    • 14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response) with 17 Level 1, 110 Level 2, and 134 Level 3 practices.
    • Built on FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, and NIST SP 800-172.
    • Assessment models: self-assessments (Level 1/2), C3PAO (Level 2), DIBCAC (Level 3); SPRS/eMASS reporting; limited POA&Ms (180-day closure).

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated in DoD solicitations for contract eligibility; reduces breach risks, enhances resilience, and provides competitive edge. Builds supply chain trust, lowers insurance costs, and aligns with NIST frameworks for broader benefits.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: governance, scoping/gap analysis, remediation, assessment prep, certification, sustainment. Targets DoD contractors/subcontractors (SMEs to primes); requires SSP, evidence artifacts, annual affirmations. Typical for complex DIB environments with enclave segmentation. (178 words)

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through hazard control and compliance. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using two nested PDCA cycles.

    Key Components

    • 10 clauses following **High-Level Structure (HLS)context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, communication, verification.
    • Built on Codex HACCP and PDCA; supports certification via accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces recalls and risks.
    • Enhances market access, supplier qualification, brand trust.
    • Drives efficiency, integration with ISO 9001/14001; GFSI foundation like FSSC 22000.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plan, training, audits, certification (stage 1/2).
    • Applies to all food chain actors; scalable for SMEs/large firms.
    • Requires 6-18 months, internal audits, management reviews.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CMMC
    Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI protection
    ISO 22000
    Food safety hazards and management

    Industry

    CMMC
    Defense Industrial Base contractors
    ISO 22000
    All food chain organizations globally

    Nature

    CMMC
    Mandatory DoD certification program
    ISO 22000
    Voluntary international certification standard

    Testing

    CMMC
    Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC assessments triennially
    ISO 22000
    Certification body audits, surveillance annually

    Penalties

    CMMC
    Contract ineligibility, debarment
    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, market exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CMMC and ISO 22000

    CMMC FAQ

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages