What is the primary objective of **CMMC**?

**The primary objective of CMMC is to verify that Defense Industrial Base (DIB) organizations have implemented cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).** CMMC operationalizes requirements from FAR 52.204-21 (15 controls for Level 1), NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 (110 controls for Level 2), and NIST SP 800-172 (24 enhanced controls for Level 3) through a tiered certification model with defined assessment pathways.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CMMC**?

**All DoD primes and subcontractors that process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI are required to comply with CMMC.** Contract solicitations specify the required level (1-3), with flow-down obligations via DFARS 252.204-7021 excluding only COTS items; this affects over 300,000 DIB entities across manufacturing, IT, and logistics.

Does **CMMC** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**CMMC requires external audits or third-party certification depending on the level and contract.** Level 1 mandates annual self-assessments with SPRS affirmation; Level 2 allows triennial self-assessments (OSA) or C3PAO certification (eMASS reporting) plus annual affirmations; Level 3 requires prerequisite Level 2 C3PAO certification and triennial DIBCAC assessment.

How often should an assessment for **CMMC** be performed?

**CMMC assessments must be performed annually for affirmations and every three years for full certification.** Level 1 requires annual self-assessments and SPRS affirmations; Level 2 needs triennial self or C3PAO assessments plus annual affirmations; Level 3 demands triennial DIBCAC assessments with continued Level 2 affirmations; certifications are valid for three years.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CMMC**?

**Non-compliance with CMMC results in contract ineligibility, potential suspension or debarment, and exposure to DFARS remedies.** Bidders without required certification are disqualified from solicitations; primes must withhold FCI/CUI from non-compliant subcontractors, risking audits, remediation costs, IP loss, and supply chain disruptions.

Can **CMMC** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CMMC Level 2 directly maps to all 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 controls, with Level 1 to FAR 52.204-21 and Level 3 to 24 NIST SP 800-172 selections.** These NIST alignments enable traceability across U.S. federal frameworks, facilitating gap analyses and control rationalization without bespoke mappings.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CMMC**?

**The first step to implement CMMC is to conduct scoping per the DoD and CMMC Scoping Guides to identify FCI/CUI boundaries and determine the target level.** Form executive sponsorship, map systems/enclaves, inventory assets, and produce an initial System Security Plan (SSP) baseline for gap analysis against the applicable controls.

What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, it evaluates systems handling customer data via **Common Criteria (CC1-CC9)** under Security (mandatory), with optional criteria scoped to services. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, delivering stakeholder trust for SaaS and cloud providers.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework, but service organizations are professionally compelled by enterprise client mandates.** It targets SaaS, cloud, fintech, and data processors (any size, from 10-employee startups to 500+ enterprises) handling customer data, where buyers demand Type 2 reports in RFPs, MSAs, and vendor risk assessments to unlock deals over $5K ACV.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent AICPA-accredited CPA firm, resulting in an attestation report rather than certification.** Type 1 validates control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over 3-12 months via sampling, evidence review (e.g., logs, pen tests), and opinions (unqualified ideal), ensuring credibility for stakeholders.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually, covering a 3-12 month period to capture full control cycles like quarterly reviews and annual pen tests.** Bridge letters from management extend validity up to 3 months between audits, confirming no material changes, while continuous monitoring sustains evidence for recertification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with client-mandated SOC 2 results in deal disqualification, extended sales cycles (3-6 months), and elevated breach liabilities exceeding $1M per incident.** Absent Type 2 reports, enterprises impose exhaustive questionnaires, indemnity clauses, or abandon RFPs; reputational damage erodes investor confidence, inflating CAC by 20-50% in SaaS markets.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps extensively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align Security controls (e.g., CC6 access to ISO Annex A), enabling efficiency in multi-compliance programs without dual audits, ideal for U.S.-centric SaaS pursuing global expansion.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise with executive alignment to select Trust Services Criteria and define in-scope systems.** Engage a CPA for readiness assessment ($5-10K), inventory assets/data flows, map gaps to TSC (50-100 controls), and prioritize Security (CC6.1-6.8) using tools like Vanta for automated evidence.

CMMC vs SOC 2 | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

CMMC

Mandatory

2021

DoD framework certifying cybersecurity for FCI and CUI protection

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for trust services criteria controls

Quick Verdict

CMMC mandates NIST-aligned cybersecurity certification for DoD contractors protecting FCI/CUI, while SOC 2 provides voluntary TSC-based audits for service organizations. DoD firms adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; SaaS providers pursue SOC 2 to build enterprise trust and accelerate sales.

Cybersecurity Maturity

CMMC

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Three cumulative levels aligning FAR and NIST controls
Third-party C3PAO assessments for Level 2 certification
DIBCAC government assessments for Level 3 APT protection
Mandatory subcontractor flow-down via DFARS clauses
Limited POA&Ms with strict 180-day closure timelines

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria evaluate five control areas
Type 2 proves operating effectiveness over time
Security mandatory with flexible optional criteria
Independent CPA firm attestation reports
Custom scoping for service organization systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

CMMC Details

What It Is

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 is a DoD certification program verifying cybersecurity protections for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It uses a tiered model with three cumulative levels based on risk, mapping to FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2, and subsets of NIST SP 800-172.

Key Components

14 domains (e.g., Access Control, Incident Response) with 17 Level 1, 110 Level 2, and 24 additional Level 3 practices.
Assessment via self-assessment (Level 1/2), C3PAO (Level 2), or DIBCAC (Level 3).
System Security Plans (SSP), POA&Ms (limited 180-day closure), and reporting to SPRS/eMASS.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandated in DoD contracts for eligibility; reduces supply chain risks, enhances resilience, and provides competitive advantage. Builds stakeholder trust via verified maturity.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, remediation, assessment, sustainment. Applies to all DIB contractors/subcontractors; triennial certifications with annual affirmations. Costs $100K+ for SMEs.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). It evaluates service organizations' commitments to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy via the Trust Services Criteria (TSC). The approach is control-based, focusing on design (Type 1) and operating effectiveness (Type 2).

Key Components

Five TSCSecurity** (mandatory, CC1-CC9), Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Privacy (P1-P11)
50-100 controls per scope, mapped to criteria
Built on COSO principles with redundancy (2-3 controls per point)
CPA-attested reports: Type 1 (point-in-time), Type 2 (over 3-12 months)

Why Organizations Use It

Accelerates sales, shortens due diligence by 80-90%
Builds enterprise trust, unlocks markets like SaaS marketplaces
Mitigates breach risks, liabilities under CCPA/SLAs
Market-driven (70-80% enterprise deals require it)
Enhances resilience, overlaps with ISO 27001 (80% controls)

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping/gap analysis (2-8 weeks), remediation/monitoring (3-12 months), CPA audit
Targets SaaS/cloud providers, all sizes (tools like Vanta for startups)
US-centric but global applicability; annual Type 2 recertification

Key Differences

Aspect	CMMC	SOC 2
Scope	FCI/CUI protection in 14 NIST domains	Trust Services Criteria: Security + optional TSCs
Industry	DoD Defense Industrial Base contractors	SaaS, cloud, service organizations globally
Nature	Mandatory DoD certification program	Voluntary AICPA attestation framework
Testing	Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC every 3 years + annual affirmations	CPA Type 1/2 audits annually
Penalties	Contract ineligibility, debarment	Lost business, no legal penalties

Scope

CMMC

FCI/CUI protection in 14 NIST domains

SOC 2

Trust Services Criteria: Security + optional TSCs

Industry

CMMC

DoD Defense Industrial Base contractors

SOC 2

SaaS, cloud, service organizations globally

Nature

CMMC

Mandatory DoD certification program

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA attestation framework

Testing

CMMC

Self/C3PAO/DIBCAC every 3 years + annual affirmations

SOC 2

CPA Type 1/2 audits annually

Penalties

CMMC

Contract ineligibility, debarment

SOC 2

Lost business, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about CMMC and SOC 2

CMMC FAQ

SOC 2 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs ISO 26000

Compare ISO 9001 vs ISO 26000: Certifiable QMS drives quality excellence; non-certifiable SR guidance boosts ethics & sustainability. Key diffs revealed—optimize now!

NIS2 vs ISO 17025

Explore NIS2 vs ISO 17025: EU cyber directive's broad scope, incident reporting & fines vs lab standard's impartiality, competence & uncertainty. Align for compliance now!

COBIT vs ISO 56002

COBIT vs ISO 56002: IT governance meets innovation mgmt. Compare 40 objectives & design factors vs PDCA cycles for tailored value, risk & compliance. Optimize strategy now!

CMMC

SOC 2

Quick Verdict

CMMC

Key Features

SOC 2

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

CMMC Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

CMMC FAQ

What is the primary objective of CMMC?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with CMMC?

Does CMMC require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for CMMC be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with CMMC?

Can CMMC be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing CMMC?

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs ISO 26000

NIS2 vs ISO 17025

COBIT vs ISO 56002