CMMC
DoD certification model for FCI and CUI protection
WEEE
EU directive for waste electrical and electronic equipment management
Quick Verdict
CMMC mandates cybersecurity certification for US DoD contractors protecting sensitive data, while WEEE enforces EU-wide end-of-life management for electronics producers. Organizations adopt CMMC for contract eligibility; WEEE for legal compliance and circular economy goals.
CMMC
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC 2.0)
Key Features
- Three cumulative certification levels for FCI to APT protection
- Precise mapping to 110 NIST SP 800-171 Level 2 controls
- C3PAO third-party assessments verifying CUI safeguards
- DFARS-mandated flow-down to supply chain subcontractors
- Limited 180-day POA&Ms with SPRS annual affirmations
WEEE
Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment
Key Features
- Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) financing model
- Open-scope coverage of all EEE since 2018
- 65%/85% collection rate targets
- Mandatory national registration and reporting
- Selective treatment and depollution requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CMMC Details
What It Is
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC 2.0) is a DoD certification framework ensuring cybersecurity for Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). It employs a tiered, risk-based model with three cumulative levels, drawing from FAR 52.204-21, NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 (110 controls), and NIST SP 800-172 (24 enhanced).
Key Components
- **LevelsLevel 1 (17 FAR basic safeguards), Level 2 (110 NIST controls across 14 domains like Access Control), Level 3 (Level 2 plus APT defenses).
- **AssessmentsSelf-assessments, C3PAO third-party, DIBCAC government-led.
- Core elementsSystem Security Plans (SSP)**, POA&Ms (180-day limit), SPRS/eMASS reporting.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for DoD contracts, preventing bid disqualification.
- Mitigates supply chain risks, reduces incidents, lowers costs.
- Builds competitive edge, enhances trust with primes.
Implementation Overview
Phased: scoping/gaps, remediation, assessment, sustainment. Applies to all DIB firms; 3-year certification with annual affirmations. (178 words)
WEEE Details
What It Is
Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE Directive) is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). Its primary purpose is to minimize e-waste environmental impacts through prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery, applying an open-scope framework covering all EEE since 2018.
Key Components
- Six open categories in Annex III for EEE classification.
- **Collection targets65% of EEE placed on market or 85% generated.
- **Treatment standardsSelective depollution (Annex II), recovery/recycling rates.
- **EPR modelProducer registration, reporting, financing via PROs; national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal compliance mandatory in EU/EEA for producers placing EEE on market.
- Reduces risks from illegal exports, penalties; recovers critical raw materials.
- Enhances circular economy alignment, stakeholder trust, supply chain resilience.
Implementation Overview
- Multi-jurisdictional: register/report per Member State, join PROs.
- Key activities: POM tracking, take-back systems, audits.
- Applies to manufacturers/importers globally selling in EU; phased approach (governance, gap analysis, rollout).
Key Differences
| Aspect | CMMC | WEEE |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity for FCI/CUI in DoD contracts | End-of-life management of electrical equipment |
| Industry | US Defense Industrial Base contractors | EEE producers/importers across EU markets |
| Nature | Mandatory certification program with assessments | Mandatory EU directive with national enforcement |
| Testing | Self-assessments or C3PAO/DIBCAC every 3 years | No formal testing; compliance via reporting/audits |
| Penalties | Contract ineligibility, debarment | Fines, market bans, legal actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CMMC and WEEE
CMMC FAQ
WEEE FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples
Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability
Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPEDA vs C-TPAT
Discover PIPEDA vs C-TPAT: Compare Canada's privacy law with US supply chain security. Key differences, compliance tips, and strategies for cross-border ops. Read now!
SQF vs GDPR UK
Compare SQF vs GDPR UK: Decode food safety certification vs data protection rules. Key differences, compliance tips & strategies for UK food firms. Boost efficiency—read now!
NIST 800-53 vs LEED
Explore NIST 800-53 vs LEED: Compare cybersecurity/privacy controls with green building standards. Gain strategies for integrated compliance, risk management & sustainability—boost resilience now!