CMMI
Process maturity framework for organizational performance improvement
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
CMMI drives voluntary process maturity globally via appraisals for predictable delivery; APRA CPS 234 mandates information security capability for Australian financial entities with strict testing and notifications. Organizations adopt CMMI for benchmarking, CPS 234 for regulatory compliance.
CMMI
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
Key Features
- Defines 6 maturity levels from incomplete to optimizing
- Organizes 25 practice areas into 4 category areas
- Offers staged and continuous representation options
- Uses SCAMPI A/B/C appraisals for benchmarking
- Enforces generic practices for institutionalization
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic risk-based testing of controls
- Third-party capability and control assessments
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CMMI Details
What It Is
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is a performance improvement framework for process institutionalization. Primarily for software, services, and acquisition, it uses maturity and capability levels to enhance predictability and quality through structured practices.
Key Components
- 4 category areas (Doing, Managing, Enabling, Improving) with 12 capability areas and 25 practice areas in v2.0.
- Maturity levels 0-5; capability levels 0-3 per area.
- Generic goals/practices for institutionalization; specific practices per area.
- SCAMPI appraisals for certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Improves delivery predictability, reduces rework, boosts ROI.
- Meets contractual requirements in defense, regulated sectors.
- Manages risks via measurement, governance.
- Builds competitive edge, stakeholder trust via benchmarks.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: assessment, piloting, rollout, appraisal, sustainment.
- Tailors to Agile/DevOps; pilots high-impact areas like requirements, configuration.
- Applies to mid-large orgs in IT, software, services globally.
- Requires authorized SCAMPI A for official ratings.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority for regulated financial entities. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates maintaining information security capabilities commensurate with threats to ensure resilience against incidents impacting confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance and outcomes.
Key Components
- **Governance and accountabilityBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles.
- **Risk managementAsset classification by criticality/sensitivity, commensurate controls.
- **Third-party oversightCapability assessments, control evaluations.
- **Incident responseDetection mechanisms, annual testing of plans.
- **AssuranceSystematic testing, internal audit reviews. No fixed control count; 36 paragraphs outline requirements with APRA notifications (72 hours for incidents, 10 days for weaknesses).
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds) to avoid penalties, heightened supervision. Enhances cyber resilience, stakeholder trust, operational continuity; integrates with CPS 220/230 for holistic risk management.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory, controls, testing program. Applies to all sizes proportionally; requires evidence-based audits, no formal certification but APRA scrutiny. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CMMI | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Process improvement across development, services, acquisition | Information security governance and cyber resilience |
| Industry | Cross-industry, global (software, IT, defense) | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary performance framework with appraisals | Mandatory prudential regulation with enforcement |
| Testing | SCAMPI appraisals (A/B/C) by certified appraisers | Systematic independent control testing annually |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Regulatory sanctions, fines, supervisory actions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CMMI and APRA CPS 234
CMMI FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27701 vs MAS TRM
Compare ISO 27701 vs MAS TRM: Unpack privacy governance (ISO 27701) vs tech risk resilience (MAS TRM). Align standards for compliance & strategy. Discover now!
Six Sigma vs CSA
Compare Six Sigma vs CSA: DMAIC drives defect reduction & efficiency vs safety standards' risk controls. Optimize quality, compliance & ops. Discover key differences now!
ISO 14064 vs ISO 26000
Compare ISO 14064 GHG standards vs ISO 26000 social responsibility guidance. Uncover key differences in quantification, verification & broad SR principles for sustainability success.