Standards Comparison

    COPPA

    Mandatory
    1998

    U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data

    VS

    BRC

    Voluntary
    2022

    Global standard for food safety in manufacturing

    Quick Verdict

    COPPA mandates parental consent for children's online data to protect kids under 13, enforced by FTC fines. BRC certifies food safety systems for manufacturers via audits. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance; BRC for retailer access and market trust.

    Children Privacy

    COPPA

    Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates verifiable parental consent before child data collection
    • Protects children under 13 on child-directed websites and apps
    • Expansive personal information definition includes persistent identifiers
    • Requires comprehensive privacy policies and data security measures
    • FTC enforcement with $43,792 civil penalties per violation
    Food Safety

    BRC

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • HACCP-based food safety plan with fundamentals
    • Senior management commitment and culture plan
    • Environmental monitoring and risk zoning
    • GFSI-benchmarked grading AA/A/B/C/D audits
    • Strict scope exclusions and traceability

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    COPPA Details

    What It Is

    The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective 2000, enforced by the FTC. It safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized personal data collection by commercial websites, apps, and IoT devices directed at kids or with actual knowledge of their users. Core approach mandates verifiable parental consent (VPC) prior to collection, use, or disclosure, with 2013 amendments expanding scope.

    Key Components

    • VPC mechanisms (11+ methods like credit card verification, video calls).
    • Broad personal information (PII) definition: names, geolocation, device IDs, photos/videos.
    • Privacy notices, parental access/review/deletion rights, data security, minimization.
    • Safe harbor programs (e.g., ESRB, iKeepSafe) for self-regulation.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Ensures legal compliance amid FTC enforcement ($43,792/violation, $170M YouTube fine). Mitigates risks from edtech, gaming data practices. Builds parental/stakeholder trust, avoids reputational damage, supports global operations targeting U.S. children.

    Implementation Overview

    Operators assess child-directed content, implement age gates, VPC, policies. Key steps: data audits, security, third-party reviews. Applies to all sizes in kid-focused sectors worldwide; no formal certification but FTC oversight via safe harbors and exams.

    BRC Details

    What It Is

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality through a structured management system combining senior management commitment, Codex HACCP-based plans, and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).

    Key Components

    • Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, risk zones, traded products.
    • Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, internal audits) critical for certification.
    • Built on risk assessments, validated controls, environmental monitoring; grading AA/A/B/C/D via third-party audits (announced/unannounced).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets retailer mandates for supply chain access.
    • Reduces recalls via robust controls on allergens, pathogens, labelling.
    • Demonstrates due diligence, enhances reputation, supports FSMA compliance.
    • Drives continuous improvement through CAPA, root cause analysis.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit. Applies to manufacturers globally; 6-12 months typical for mid-sized sites with CAPEX for site upgrades.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    COPPA
    Children's online privacy and data collection under 13
    BRC
    Food safety management in manufacturing and packing

    Industry

    COPPA
    Online services, apps, websites targeting children globally
    BRC
    Food manufacturers, packaging, worldwide retailers

    Nature

    COPPA
    Mandatory US federal law enforced by FTC
    BRC
    Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard

    Testing

    COPPA
    FTC enforcement actions and investigations
    BRC
    Annual third-party announced/unannounced audits

    Penalties

    COPPA
    $43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M
    BRC
    Certification loss, grade downgrade, no fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about COPPA and BRC

    COPPA FAQ

    BRC FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages