What is the primary objective of **COPPA**?

**The primary objective of COPPA is to protect the online privacy of children under 13 by requiring verifiable parental consent before operators collect, use, or disclose their personal information.** Enacted in 1998 and effective April 21, 2000, COPPA mandates operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices directed to children—or with actual knowledge of collecting data from them—post privacy policies, limit collection to necessities, ensure data security, and grant parents review, deletion, and revocation rights (16 CFR Part 312).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COPPA**?

**COPPA requires compliance from operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices that are directed to children under 13 or have actual knowledge of collecting personal information from them.** This includes entities collecting or benefiting from such data (e.g., ad networks); non-profits are exempt if not commercial. It applies extraterritorially to services processing U.S. children's data, with "personal information" covering names, addresses, persistent identifiers (IP addresses, device IDs), geolocation (street-level), and audio/video files.

Does **COPPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COPPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for all operators but allows participation in FTC-approved safe harbor programs that involve self-regulatory audits.** Examples include iKeepSafe (approved 2014) and ESRB modifications (2018), which provide compliance safe harbors if audited by approved entities. Operators must still demonstrate verifiable parental consent, data security, and parental rights fulfillment.

How often should an assessment for **COPPA** be performed?

**COPPA does not prescribe a fixed frequency for assessments, but operators should conduct regular internal reviews aligned with data retention needs and technological changes.** Assessments ensure ongoing compliance with verifiable parental consent mechanisms, data minimization, and security, especially post-2013 amendments adding persistent identifiers and geolocation. Monitor FTC Federal Register notices (e.g., 1999–2019 rulemakings) for updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COPPA**?

**Non-compliance with COPPA results in civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation, enforced by the FTC as unfair or deceptive practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act, with state AGs able to sue.** Landmark cases include YouTube's $170 million fine (2019) for unconsented tracking on child-directed content. Additional risks include injunctions, data deletion orders, reputational damage, and transaction/reputation losses.

Can **COPPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COPPA can be mapped to other international frameworks through shared principles like parental consent, data minimization, and child privacy protections, though specifics vary.** Its under-13 threshold and verifiable consent align with global child data rules, aiding operators in multi-jurisdictional compliance via safe harbors and precedents.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COPPA**?

**The first step to implement COPPA is to conduct an audience analysis to determine if your service is directed to children under 13 or has actual knowledge of their data collection.** Post a comprehensive privacy policy, implement age screening, and prepare verifiable parental consent methods (e.g., credit card verification, video calls) per the 11+ FTC-approved options on a sliding scale by data sensitivity.

What is the primary objective of **CSA**?

**The primary objective of CSA (Computer Software Assurance) is to provide a risk-based methodology for assuring the safety, effectiveness, and compliance of regulated software in GxP environments.** Introduced in FDA draft guidance (2022), CSA replaces traditional validation with tiered activities—critical thinking for high-impact changes, limited verification for low-risk—aligned to NIST CSF functions (identify, protect, detect, respond, recover) to ensure data integrity under 21 CFR Part 11 and Part 820 while reducing documentation burden.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CSA**?

**Pharma, biotech, and medical device manufacturers handling GxP software are professionally required to implement CSA per FDA expectations.** This includes organizations using electronic batch records, LIMS, MES, or device software impacting patient safety; third-party SaaS vendors must support CSA-compatible controls via SLAs. No specific employee/revenue thresholds exist, but FDA inspections target all regulated entities, with non-compliance risking Form 483 observations.

Does **CSA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, CSA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification; it emphasizes internal risk-based assurance.** FDA guidance focuses on documented evidence of lifecycle controls (e.g., IQ/OQ/PQ, change management), with internal audits sufficing for most. However, high-risk software may trigger FDA inspection scrutiny; SCC-accredited bodies support related conformity if pursuing optional certifications.

How often should an assessment for **CSA** be performed?

**CSA assessments must be performed continuously via risk-based monitoring, with formal reviews at least annually or per change events.** FDA expects ongoing asset inventories, vulnerability scans, and post-change validations; internal audits occur every 12 months, prioritizing high-risk software. Periodic management reviews align with PDCA cycles, with metrics like MTTD/MTTR tracked quarterly.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CSA**?

**Non-compliance with CSA risks FDA warning letters, Form 483 observations, fines up to $1M per violation, product seizures, and batch invalidation.** Data integrity failures lead to recalls, litigation, and operational halts; unvalidated software exposes cyber risks (e.g., ransomware costing $4.4M average), plus reputational harm and market exclusion.

Can **CSA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CSA maps directly to frameworks like EU Annex 11 and Japan's MHLW guidelines via shared risk-based validation and data integrity principles.** Its NIST CSF alignment enables integration with ISO 27001; organizations use clause mappings for harmonized global compliance, reducing duplicate efforts in multinational operations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CSA**?

**The first step is conducting a current-state gap analysis of all regulated software assets against CSA risk tiers.** Inventory in-house/SaaS tools, map to GxP impact, score risks (high/medium/low), and produce a prioritized remediation roadmap with executive charter—typically completed in Phase 0 within 30-60 days.

COPPA vs CSA | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

COPPA

Mandatory

1998

U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data

CSA

Voluntary

1919

Canadian consensus standards for occupational health and safety

Quick Verdict

COPPA safeguards children's online privacy under 13 via parental consent, targeting digital platforms. CSA regulates controlled substances handling for pharma and healthcare with strict security. Companies adopt COPPA for child data compliance, CSA to prevent diversion and ensure legal operations.

Children Privacy

COPPA

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Requires verifiable parental consent for children's data collection
Expansive personal information includes persistent IDs, geolocation
Targets child-directed websites, apps, IoT knowingly collecting data
Provides parental access, review, deletion rights for data
FTC enforcement with $43,792 civil penalties per violation

Product Safety

CSA

CSA Z1000 Occupational Health and Safety Management

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Consensus-based development with 60-day public review
PDCA cycle for OHS management systems
Hazard classification across six categories
Risk assessment using severity and likelihood
Hierarchy of controls prioritizing elimination

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COPPA Details

What It Is

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective April 2000, enforced by the FTC. It safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized personal data collection by commercial websites, apps, and IoT devices directed at kids or with actual knowledge of their users. The core approach empowers parents via verifiable consent before data collection, use, or disclosure.

Key Components

**Verifiable parental consent (VPC)Methods like credit card checks, video calls (11+ options, sliding scale by risk).
**Privacy noticesComprehensive policies detailing data practices.
**Broad PII definitionNames, addresses, persistent IDs, geolocation, audio/video with child's image/voice.
**Parental rightsAccess, review, deletion, revocation.
**Data security and minimizationLimit retention, ensure confidentiality. Safe harbor programs (e.g., ESRB) offer FTC-approved compliance paths.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for covered operators to avoid crippling fines ($43,792/violation; YouTube $170M). Reduces breach risks, builds parental trust, meets legal obligations. Enhances reputation, enables global operations targeting U.S. kids, mitigates enforcement risks amid rising child online activity.

Implementation Overview

Analyze audience for child appeal, post notices, deploy age screens/VPC, audit third-parties, minimize data. Applies to commercial entities worldwide if processing U.S. kids' data; all sizes but burdensome for small operators. No formal certification but FTC audits safe harbors; ongoing monitoring required. (178 words)

CSA Details

What It Is

CSA standards, developed by CSA Group, are consensus-based Canadian standards for Health, Environment, and Safety (HES). Key examples include CSA Z1000 for occupational health and safety management systems (OHSMS) and CSA Z1002 for hazard identification and risk assessment. They follow a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology, aligning with ISO 45001.

Key Components

Leadership and policy, planning (hazard ID, risk assessment), implementation, checking (audits, incidents), management review.
Hazard categories: biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychosocial, safety.
Hierarchy of controls prioritizing elimination and engineering.
Voluntary consensus process with SCC accreditation; certification available.

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates due diligence, satisfies legal duties when referenced in regulations.
Reduces risks, improves compliance monitoring, enhances reputation.
Enables policy implementation, market access via certifications.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, policy development, training, audits, reviews.
Applies to all sizes/industries in Canada/internationally; pilots for high-risk areas.
Certification optional via CSA Group or SCC bodies. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	COPPA	CSA
Scope	Children's online privacy under 13	Controlled substances regulation
Industry	Online services, apps, websites	Pharma, healthcare, research
Nature	Federal privacy law, mandatory	Federal drug control law, mandatory
Testing	Parental consent verification	Inventory audits, security checks
Penalties	$43,792 per violation	Fines, imprisonment, registration loss

Scope

COPPA

Children's online privacy under 13

CSA

Controlled substances regulation

Industry

COPPA

Online services, apps, websites

CSA

Pharma, healthcare, research

Nature

COPPA

Federal privacy law, mandatory

CSA

Federal drug control law, mandatory

Testing

COPPA

Parental consent verification

CSA

Inventory audits, security checks

Penalties

COPPA

$43,792 per violation

CSA

Fines, imprisonment, registration loss

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COPPA and CSA

COPPA FAQ

CSA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs EU AI Act

Discover PIPEDA vs EU AI Act: Compare Canada's privacy law with Europe's AI rules. Key differences, compliance strategies & tips for global success.

BREEAM vs ISO 41001

Compare BREEAM vs ISO 41001: BREEAM rates building sustainability (energy, health, ecology) for certifications like Outstanding. ISO 41001 governs FM systems via PDCA for efficiency. Choose wisely—read now!

ISO 14001 vs COBIT

ISO 14001 vs COBIT: EMS standard for eco-compliance meets IT governance framework. Uncover differences, synergies for risk mgmt, audits & integration. Optimize strategy now!

COPPA

CSA

Quick Verdict

COPPA

Key Features

CSA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COPPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

CSA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COPPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of COPPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COPPA?

Does COPPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COPPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COPPA?

Can COPPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COPPA?

CSA FAQ

What is the primary objective of CSA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with CSA?

Does CSA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for CSA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with CSA?

Can CSA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing CSA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs EU AI Act

BREEAM vs ISO 41001

ISO 14001 vs COBIT