Standards Comparison

    COPPA

    Mandatory
    1998

    U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data

    VS

    FedRAMP

    Mandatory
    2011

    U.S. government program standardizing cloud security authorization.

    Quick Verdict

    COPPA protects children under 13 online via parental consent, while FedRAMP authorizes secure cloud for federal use through rigorous assessments. Companies adopt COPPA to avoid massive fines; FedRAMP to win government contracts.

    Children Privacy

    COPPA

    Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates verifiable parental consent before child data collection
    • Targets child-directed websites, apps, and online services
    • Broad PII definition includes persistent IDs and geolocation
    • Provides parental access, review, and data deletion rights
    • FTC enforcement with up to $43,792 per violation fines
    Cloud Security

    FedRAMP

    Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Assess once, use many times reusability across agencies
    • NIST 800-53 Rev 5 baselines at Low/Moderate/High levels
    • Independent 3PAO security assessments and audits
    • Continuous monitoring with monthly/annual reporting
    • FedRAMP Marketplace for authorized CSP listings

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    COPPA Details

    What It Is

    Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective April 2000, administered by the FTC. It safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized personal data collection by commercial websites, apps, and services directed at kids or with actual knowledge of users' age. Primary purpose: empower parents via verifiable consent before collection, use, or disclosure. Risk-based scope targets operators benefiting from data, including ad networks, with 2013 amendments expanding PII to persistent IDs, geolocation, and multimedia.

    Key Components

    • **Verifiable parental consent (VPC)11+ methods like credit cards, video calls.
    • Comprehensive privacy policies and notices.
    • Broad PII (10+ categories: names, device IDs, photos/videos).
    • Parental rights for access, review, deletion, revocation.
    • Data minimization, security, no-conditioning on consent.
    • Safe harbor self-regulatory programs (e.g., ESRB, iKeepSafe).

    Why Organizations Use It

    Ensures legal compliance amid FTC enforcement ($43,792/violation; YouTube $170M fine). Mitigates risks from edtech, gaming, IoT. Builds parent/stakeholder trust, enables child markets. Global applicability deters violations; precedents guide best practices.

    Implementation Overview

    Assess child-directed status via analytics; deploy age gates, VPC mechanisms, policies. Key activities: data audits, tracker removal, training. Applies to commercial ops targeting U.S. kids worldwide; suits all sizes. Safe harbors require audits; no universal certification but FTC oversight.

    FedRAMP Details

    What It Is

    FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls and FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS).

    Key Components

    • Baselines with ~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls across 20 families.
    • Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
    • Built on NIST standards; compliance via 3PAO assessments and agency/program ATOs.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Unlocks federal contracts worth $20M+; required for CMMC-compliant DoD work.
    • Enhances risk management, builds stakeholder trust as security badge.
    • Competitive edge for commercial sales; streamlines procurement.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: sponsor/prep/assessment/monitoring; 12-18 months typical.
    • Applies to CSPs targeting U.S. federal market; involves 3PAOs, documentation.
    • High costs ($150k-$2M+); ongoing quarterly/annual reporting. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    COPPA
    Child online privacy under 13
    FedRAMP
    Cloud security for federal agencies

    Industry

    COPPA
    Commercial websites/apps global
    FedRAMP
    Cloud providers for US government

    Nature

    COPPA
    Mandatory FTC regulation
    FedRAMP
    Standardized authorization program

    Testing

    COPPA
    Self-compliance parental consent
    FedRAMP
    3PAO assessments continuous monitoring

    Penalties

    COPPA
    $43k per violation fines
    FedRAMP
    Revocation contract loss

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about COPPA and FedRAMP

    COPPA FAQ

    FedRAMP FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages