What is the primary objective of **COPPA**?

**The primary objective of COPPA is to protect the online privacy of children under 13 by requiring verifiable parental consent before operators collect their personal information.** Enacted in 1998 and effective April 21, 2000, COPPA mandates operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices directed to children—or with actual knowledge of collecting data from them—to post privacy policies, limit collection to necessities, ensure data security, and grant parents access, review, and deletion rights (16 CFR Part 312).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COPPA**?

**Operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices that direct content to children under 13 or have actual knowledge of collecting their personal information must comply with COPPA.** This includes entities collecting or benefiting from such data (e.g., ad networks), with extraterritorial reach to services processing U.S. children's data; non-profits are exempt if not commercial.

Does **COPPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COPPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for all operators but allows participation in FTC-approved safe harbor programs.** These self-regulatory programs, such as iKeepSafe (approved 2014) and ESRB (modified 2018), involve FTC-audited compliance; operators must otherwise demonstrate adherence through internal policies, data practices, and verifiable parental consent mechanisms.

How often should an assessment for **COPPA** be performed?

**COPPA does not prescribe a fixed frequency for assessments, but operators should conduct regular internal reviews aligned with data practices and FTC enforcement trends.** Ongoing monitoring is essential for age-screening, consent mechanisms, and "actual knowledge" defenses, with heightened scrutiny recommended post-amendments (e.g., 2013) or during FTC regulatory reviews (e.g., 2019 comment periods).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COPPA**?

**Non-compliance with COPPA results in civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation, enforced by the FTC as unfair or deceptive practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act.** State AGs may also sue; precedents include YouTube's $170 million fine (2019) for unconsented tracking on child-directed content, with additional risks of injunctions, redress, and reputational harm.

Can **COPPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**COPPA cannot be directly mapped to other international frameworks as it is a standalone U.S. federal law focused exclusively on children under 13.** While it shares parental consent principles, its scope (e.g., persistent identifiers, geolocation) and enforcement differ, requiring separate compliance for global operators targeting U.S. children.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COPPA**?

**The first step to implement COPPA is to conduct an audience analysis to determine if your service is directed to children under 13 or collects their data with actual knowledge.** Assess content appeal (e.g., cartoons, games), implement age-screening, post a comprehensive privacy policy, and prepare verifiable parental consent methods like credit card verification or video calls.

What is the primary objective of **HITRUST CSF**?

**The primary objective of HITRUST CSF is to provide a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from over 60 authoritative sources into a single assurance program.** This enables organizations to assess once and report many times across regulations, using risk-based tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors, a maturity model (Policy, Process, Implemented, Measured, Managed), and MyCSF platform for standardized validation.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **HITRUST CSF**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with HITRUST CSF, as it is a voluntary, industry-agnostic framework.** Professionally, it is essential for healthcare entities (covered entities, business associates handling ePHI/PHI), cloud providers, and vendors facing customer mandates from payers, providers, or contracts demanding certified assurance to reduce third-party risk questionnaires and audits.

Does **HITRUST CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF requires validated assessments by Authorized External Assessors for certification, followed by HITRUST centralized quality assurance.** Self-assessments via MyCSF support readiness, but e1 (44 controls, 1-year), i1 (182 requirements, 1-year), and r2 (tailored, 2-year with interim) certifications demand evidence-based testing (documentation, interviews, technical scans) across 19 domains.

How often should an assessment for **HITRUST CSF** be performed?

**HITRUST CSF certifications require reassessment based on level: e1 and i1 annually, r2 every two years with a mandatory interim assessment at one year.** Continuous monitoring via MyCSF sustains maturity, with operational evidence (e.g., 90-day control operation) needed for validated fieldwork within 90-day windows.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **HITRUST CSF**?

**Non-compliance with HITRUST CSF results in no direct legal penalties, as it is voluntary, but leads to lost contracts, exclusion from healthcare ecosystems, higher cyber insurance premiums, and increased third-party audit costs.** It forfeits the 99.4% breach-free record among certified organizations and "assess once, report many" efficiencies.

Can **HITRUST CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF includes built-in mappings to over 60 frameworks, enabling requirement-level rollups via MyCSF.** Cross-references cover HIPAA Security Rule, NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, ISO 27001/27002, SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, PCI DSS, GDPR, FedRAMP, and state laws for "assess once, report many" outcomes.

What is the first step to begin implementing **HITRUST CSF**?

**The first step to implement HITRUST CSF is to access MyCSF and complete the scoping questionnaire defining organizational, system, and regulatory risk factors.** This generates a tailored control set (across 19 domains, 14 categories), identifies inheritance opportunities (e.g., 60-85% from cloud providers), and produces a readiness gap analysis for remediation planning.

COPPA vs HITRUST CSF

Standards Comparison

COPPA

Mandatory

1998

U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data collection

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary

2022

Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

Quick Verdict

COPPA mandates parental consent for children's online data, enforced by FTC fines, while HITRUST CSF offers voluntary certification harmonizing 60+ standards for regulated sectors. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance; HITRUST for trusted assurance and multi-framework efficiency.

Children Privacy

COPPA

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Requires verifiable parental consent before collecting children's personal data
Applies to commercial websites and apps directed to children under 13
Broad PII definition includes persistent IDs, geolocation, audio/video files
Grants parents rights to access, review, and delete child data
FTC enforcement with penalties up to $43,792 per violation

Information Security

HITRUST CSF

HITRUST Common Security Framework

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into unified controls
Risk-based tailoring via scoping factors
Five-level maturity scoring model
Tiered certifiable assessments e1/i1/r2
MyCSF platform with inheritance support

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COPPA Details

What It Is

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), enacted in 1998 and effective April 2000, is a U.S. federal regulation enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It safeguards privacy of children under 13 by prohibiting unauthorized collection of personal information from commercial websites, apps, and services directed to kids or with actual knowledge of users' age. Primary approach: mandates verifiable parental consent (VPC) before data collection, use, or disclosure, empowering parents.

Key Components

Core obligations: privacy policies, VPC, parental access/review/deletion rights, data security, minimization.
Expansive PII (16 CFR Part 312): names, addresses, persistent identifiers (IP, device IDs), street-level geolocation, child images/voice (expanded 2013).
VPC methods: 11+ (credit card, video call, sliding scale by risk).
Safe harbors for compliance; FTC audits programs like ESRB.

Why Organizations Use It

Avoids crippling fines ($43,792/violation, e.g., YouTube $170M). Meets legal mandates for child-directed operators (global reach). Builds parent trust, mitigates reputation risks, prevents breaches. Essential for gaming, edtech, adtech amid rising enforcement.

Implementation Overview

Steps: audience analysis, age gates, VPC tech, policies, audits.
Applies to all sizes collecting kids' data, U.S./foreign operators.
Typical: 6-12 months; use tools for SMBs, third-party audits for enterprises.

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

The HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ authoritative sources like HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001/27002, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It uses risk-based tailoring, maturity scoring, and MyCSF platform for scalable assurance in regulated sectors.

Key Components

**19 assessment domainsInformation Protection, Access Control, Risk Management, Incident Management, etc.
Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 46-49 objectives, 149-156 specifications
**Five-level maturity modelPolicy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed
**Tiered productse1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year validity)

Why Organizations Use It

"Assess once, report many" reduces compliance fatigue
Provides trusted certification for third-party reliance
99.4% breach-free rate; ROI from efficiency, market access
Meets healthcare mandates, boosts TPRM, cyber insurance

Implementation Overview

Phased via MyCSF: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment, monitoring
Involves policies, evidence, assessor fieldwork
For regulated industries (healthcare, finance); any size, global

(178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	COPPA	HITRUST CSF
Scope	Children's online privacy and data collection	Comprehensive security and privacy controls
Industry	Online services targeting children under 13, global	Healthcare, finance, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic
Nature	Mandatory U.S. federal regulation enforced by FTC	Voluntary certifiable framework with assessor validation
Testing	FTC audits, no formal certification required	Validated assessments via MyCSF, maturity scoring
Penalties	$43,792 per violation, FTC fines	Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Scope

COPPA

Children's online privacy and data collection

HITRUST CSF

Comprehensive security and privacy controls

Industry

COPPA

Online services targeting children under 13, global

HITRUST CSF

Healthcare, finance, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic

Nature

COPPA

Mandatory U.S. federal regulation enforced by FTC

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary certifiable framework with assessor validation

Testing

COPPA

FTC audits, no formal certification required

HITRUST CSF

Validated assessments via MyCSF, maturity scoring

Penalties

COPPA

$43,792 per violation, FTC fines

HITRUST CSF

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COPPA and HITRUST CSF

COPPA FAQ

HITRUST CSF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 materiality determinations with our step-by-step framework, checklists, case law factors, and real-world examples. Avoid enforceme

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIST 800-171 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

Compare NIST 800-171 CUI cybersecurity vs ISO/IEC 42001 AI governance. Key differences, overlaps & strategies for contractors. Boost compliance—read now!

ISO 20000 vs CAA

Explore ISO 20000 vs CAA: IT service mgmt excellence meets Clean Air Act regs. Key diffs, benefits, implementation strategies for compliance & optimization. Dive in!

Australian Privacy Act vs Basel III

Compare Australian Privacy Act vs Basel III: Key principles, APPs/NDB vs capital/liquidity rules, compliance strategies & enforcement risks. Master both for exec resilience!

COPPA

HITRUST CSF

Quick Verdict

COPPA

Key Features

HITRUST CSF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COPPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COPPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of COPPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COPPA?

Does COPPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COPPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COPPA?

Can COPPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COPPA?

HITRUST CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of HITRUST CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with HITRUST CSF?

Does HITRUST CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for HITRUST CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with HITRUST CSF?

Can HITRUST CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing HITRUST CSF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Materiality Determination Framework: Step-by-Step Guide with Checklists and Real-World Examples

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIST 800-171 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

ISO 20000 vs CAA

Australian Privacy Act vs Basel III