COPPA
U.S. law requiring parental consent for children's online data
IFS Food
Global standard for food safety and process compliance.
Quick Verdict
COPPA mandates parental consent for children's online data to protect kids under 13, enforced by FTC fines. IFS Food certifies food manufacturers' processes for safety and quality via annual audits. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance, IFS for retailer market access.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent for children's data
- Protects children under 13 on child-directed services
- Expansive PII including persistent IDs, geolocation data
- Imposes FTC penalties up to $43,792 per violation
- Grants parents data review, deletion rights
IFS Food
IFS Food Version 8
Key Features
- Risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) audits
- Minimum 50% on-site production evaluation time
- 10 Knock-Out requirements for certification
- Annual audits with unannounced options
- Food fraud and defense vulnerability assessments
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998 and effective 2000. Administered by the FTC, it safeguards children under 13 from unauthorized collection of personal information by operators of commercial websites, apps, and services directed to kids or with actual knowledge of child users. Its strict approach mandates verifiable parental consent prior to any data collection, use, or disclosure.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent via 11+ methods (e.g., credit card, video calls).
- Broad personal information definition: names, addresses, persistent identifiers (IP, device IDs), geolocation, audio/video files.
- Requirements for privacy notices, data security, parental access/review/deletion, and data minimization.
- Compliance via direct adherence or FTC-approved safe harbors like ESRB or iKeepSafe.
Why Organizations Use It
Essential for legal compliance to avoid penalties up to $43,792 per violation (e.g., YouTube's $170M fine). Mitigates risks from edtech, gaming, IoT; builds parent trust; enables global operations targeting U.S. kids. Enhances reputation amid rising enforcement.
Implementation Overview
Operators assess child-directed status, deploy age screens/VPC mechanisms, post policies, secure data. Applies to all sizes in relevant industries worldwide. Safe harbor audits recommended; involves training, third-party reviews. Typical for 6-12 months rollout.
IFS Food Details
What It Is
IFS Food Version 8 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification standard for auditing product and process compliance in food manufacturing. It applies to sites processing food or packing loose products with contamination risks, using a risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) emphasizing on-site verification.
Key Components
- Organized into governance, HACCP/PRPs, operational controls (e.g., allergens, fraud, defense), and performance monitoring.
- Over 200 checklist requirements with 10 Knock-Out (KO) criteria.
- Built on HACCP, PRPs, and integrity programs.
- Annual audits with scoring (Higher/Foundation levels) via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets European retailer demands for private-label supply.
- Reduces audit duplication, enhances market access.
- Manages risks like recalls, fraud; builds trust.
- Drives efficiency, continuous improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FSMS design, training, validation, audits.
- Suits manufacturers globally; site-specific.
- Requires 6-12 months, internal audits, unannounced options. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | IFS Food |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Children's online privacy and data collection under 13 | Food manufacturing safety, quality, legality |
| Industry | Online services, apps, websites targeting kids; US/global | Food processors, packers; global esp. Europe |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law enforced by FTC | Voluntary GFSI certification standard |
| Testing | FTC enforcement investigations, no routine audits | Annual on-site product/process audits |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M | Certification denial/withdrawal, no fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and IFS Food
COPPA FAQ
IFS Food FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists
Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EPA vs SQF
Compare EPA standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) vs SQF food safety certification. Key compliance diffs, audits, risks for manufacturers. Optimize strategies—read now!
HITRUST CSF vs ISO 27017
Compare HITRUST CSF vs ISO 27017: Certifiable HITRUST harmonizes 60+ standards with maturity scoring & MyCSF; ISO 27017 adds cloud guidance to 27002. Choose your ideal framework now.
CCPA vs PRINCE2
Compare CCPA vs PRINCE2: Decode privacy law compliance vs structured project governance. Key differences, strategies, pitfalls & implementation roadmap for success.