COPPA
U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for child online data
ISO 22000
International standard for food safety management systems
Quick Verdict
COPPA mandates parental consent for children's online data to protect privacy, while ISO 22000 provides voluntary FSMS certification for food safety. Companies adopt COPPA for legal compliance amid high fines; ISO 22000 for market access and supply chain trust.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent before child data collection
- Targets operators of child-directed websites and services
- Expansive personal information definition includes persistent IDs
- Requires parental access review and data deletion rights
- FTC enforcement with up to $43,792 per violation fines
ISO 22000
ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
- Dual PDCA cycles for governance and operations
- HACCP-based hazard analysis and control plans
- Prerequisite programs with OPRPs and CCPs
- Interactive communication across food chain
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), enacted in 1998 and effective 2000, is a U.S. federal regulation enforced by the FTC. It safeguards privacy of children under 13 by requiring parental control over personal data collection, use, and disclosure on commercial websites, apps, and services directed to kids or with actual knowledge of child users. Its risk-based approach mandates verifiable parental consent (VPC) before collection.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent via 11+ methods (e.g., credit card, video call).
- Comprehensive privacy notices and policies.
- Parental rights to access, review, delete data.
- Data minimization, security, and retention limits.
- Broad personal information definition (e.g., persistent IDs, geolocation, audio/video). Built on parental empowerment; safe harbor programs for compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures legal compliance amid $43,792 per violation fines (e.g., YouTube's $170M). Mitigates enforcement risks, builds parent/stakeholder trust, enables safe child-directed services globally. Enhances reputation in edtech, gaming, adtech.
Implementation Overview
Assess audience for child appeal, post policies, deploy age screens/VPC, minimize data, secure systems. Applies to operators worldwide targeting U.S. kids; no formal certification but FTC-approved safe harbors. Suited for websites, apps, IoT; scalable via tools for SMBs/enterprises. (178 words)
ISO 22000 Details
What It Is
ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through systematic hazard control. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using the High-Level Structure (HLS).
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification.
- Built on Codex HACCP and dual PDCA cycles.
- Voluntary certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces recalls/risks.
- Enables market access, supplier qualification, GFSI alignment.
- Builds trust, integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
- Drives efficiency, resilience, continual improvement.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plans, training, audits.
- Applies to all food chain organizations; scalable by size.
- Requires 3-month operation pre-certification; annual surveillance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | ISO 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Children's online privacy and data collection | Food safety management across food chain |
| Industry | Online services, apps, websites globally | Food production, processing, retail worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law, FTC enforced | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | FTC audits, no formal certification | Internal audits, external certification audits |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation, FTC fines | Loss of certification, no direct fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and ISO 22000
COPPA FAQ
ISO 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for ADAS Suppliers: Simulating Prototype IP Leaks and Ransomware in Hybrid Supply Chains (2025 Edition with Hero Scenario Visual)
Master TISAX 'Very High' tabletop exercises for ADAS suppliers with 2024 breach simulations like CAD leaks and ransomware. Get scripts, AAR templates, hybrid ti
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UAE PDPL vs TOGAF
Unlock UAE PDPL vs TOGAF: Align data privacy laws with enterprise architecture for seamless compliance. Key gaps, strategies & DPIA tips to thrive. Dive in now!
ISO 14064 vs Basel III
ISO 14064 vs Basel III: GHG inventories, verification (ISO) vs capital buffers, liquidity rules (Basel). Master compliance differences for resilient strategy.
SOC 2 vs ISO 28000
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO 28000: SOC 2 secures SaaS data via Trust Criteria; ISO 28000 fortifies supply chains. Uncover differences, implementation, and choose your compliance edge now.