COPPA
U.S. law requiring parental consent for children's online data
PDPA
Southeast Asia's regulations for personal data protection
Quick Verdict
COPPA protects children under 13 from online data collection via parental consent, targeting kid-directed apps globally. PDPA governs general personal data processing with consent and security for organizations in Singapore/Thailand. Companies adopt COPPA for US child compliance, PDPA for regional operations.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' data
- Broad PII definition includes device IDs and geolocation
- Targets child-directed websites, apps, and online services
- Grants parents access, review, and deletion rights
- Enforces penalties up to $43,792 per FTC violation
PDPA
Personal Data Protection Act 2012
Key Features
- Mandatory Data Protection Officer appointment
- 72-hour data breach notification requirement
- Consent and deemed consent mechanisms
- Cross-border data transfer limitations
- Data subject access and correction rights
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective April 2000, and enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under 16 CFR Part 312. It safeguards online privacy of children under 13 by empowering parents to control personal data collection on commercial websites, apps, and services directed to kids or with actual knowledge of their age. Its consent-based approach mandates verifiable parental involvement before any data use or disclosure.
Key Components
- Verifiable parental consent (VPC) via 11+ methods like credit cards or video calls.
- Expansive personal information (PII) definition covering names, geolocation, device IDs, and multimedia.
- Requirements for privacy notices, data security, minimization, and parental access/deletion rights.
- Safe harbor programs (e.g., ESRB, iKeepSafe) for audited self-regulation.
Why Organizations Use It
COPPA compliance is legally mandatory for applicable operators, avoiding crippling fines like YouTube's $170 million. It mitigates enforcement risks, builds parental trust, enables child-safe products, and supports global operations targeting U.S. kids.
Implementation Overview
Operators assess child-directed status, post policies, deploy age screens/VPC, secure data, and limit collection. Applies to commercial entities worldwide; safe harbors offer compliance paths via FTC-approved audits. Typical for websites/apps in edtech, gaming; high burden for small operators but tools ease startup.
PDPA Details
What It Is
PDPA (Personal Data Protection Act) refers to a family of statutes, primarily Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act 2012, Thailand's PDPA (2019), and others like Taiwan's. These are mandatory regulations governing collection, use, disclosure, and protection of personal data by organizations. They adopt a principles-based, risk-proportionate approach balancing individual privacy with business needs.
Key Components
- Core obligations: consent/notification, purpose limitation, access/correction rights, security safeguards, retention limits, transfer controls, breach notification, accountability.
- 8-10 main principles across regimes.
- Built on GDPR-like frameworks with local nuances (e.g., DPO, Do Not Call).
- Compliance via self-assessment, no universal certification but regulator enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal compliance in Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan to avoid fines (up to SGD 1M/THB 5M).
- Risk reduction via breach response and security.
- Builds trust, enables cross-border ops, supports innovation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, data mapping, policies, controls, training, audits.
- Applies to all orgs processing local data; risk-based for SMEs/multinationals.
- No certification; ongoing via DPMP, regulator guidance (184 words).
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | PDPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Children under 13 online data collection | General personal data processing by organizations |
| Industry | Commercial websites/apps targeting kids (US/global) | All private sector organizations (Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan) |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law enforced by FTC | Mandatory national acts with PDPC enforcement |
| Testing | No formal testing; compliance audits/safe harbors | Self-assessments, DPIAs, internal audits |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation; $170M fines | SGD 1M or THB 5M fines; criminal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and PDPA
COPPA FAQ
PDPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
WEEE vs PDPA
Compare WEEE vs PDPA: EU e-waste rules (collection targets, EPR) vs Asia's data privacy laws (consent, breaches). Key diffs in scope, obligations. Master global compliance now.
SAFe vs FSSC 22000
SAFe vs FSSC 22000: Agile scaling framework for IT meets GFSI food safety cert. Compare principles, configs, compliance & ROI—choose your enterprise edge now.
ISO 27001 vs TISAX
ISO 27001 vs TISAX: Global ISMS standard meets automotive supply chain security. Compare controls, risk approaches, implementation—choose the right path for compliance & resilience.