What is the primary objective of **COPPA**?

**The primary objective of COPPA is to protect the privacy of children under 13 by requiring verifiable parental consent before operators collect their personal information online.** Enacted in 1998 and effective April 21, 2000, COPPA mandates that operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices directed to children—or with actual knowledge of collecting data from them—post privacy policies, limit data collection, ensure security, and grant parents review, deletion, and revocation rights (16 CFR Part 312).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **COPPA**?

**Operators of commercial websites, online services, mobile apps, and IoT devices that are directed to children under 13 or have actual knowledge of collecting personal information from them must comply with COPPA.** This includes entities collecting or benefiting from such data (e.g., ad networks), with extraterritorial reach to services processing U.S. children's data; non-profits are exempt if not commercial.

Does **COPPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**COPPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification but allows participation in FTC-approved safe harbor programs, such as iKeepSafe (approved 2014) or ESRB (modified 2018), which involve self-regulatory audits.** Operators must implement internal measures like data security and verifiable parental consent (VPC), with FTC enforcement focusing on compliance demonstrations during investigations.

How often should an assessment for **COPPA** be performed?

**COPPA does not prescribe a fixed frequency for assessments, but operators should conduct regular internal reviews, such as annually or upon material changes like new features or data practices, to ensure ongoing compliance.** FTC guidance emphasizes maintaining "reasonable procedures" for data security and VPC, with monitoring tied to Federal Register updates (e.g., 2019 reviews) and emerging risks like AI personalization.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **COPPA**?

**Non-compliance with COPPA results in FTC enforcement actions with civil penalties up to $43,792 per violation, plus potential state AG lawsuits and injunctive relief.** Notable cases include YouTube's $170 million settlement (2019) for unconsented tracking on child-directed content; operators face data deletion orders, business practice changes, and reputational harm.

Can **COPPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, COPPA's requirements for parental consent, data minimization, and child privacy can be mapped to elements in other international frameworks focused on minors' data protection.** Core alignments include age thresholds under 13, VPC mechanisms, and PII definitions (e.g., persistent identifiers, geolocation), facilitating compliance overlap for global operators.

What is the first step to begin implementing **COPPA**?

**The first step to implement COPPA is to conduct an audience analysis to determine if your service is directed to children under 13 or has actual knowledge of their data collection.** This involves reviewing content appeal (e.g., cartoons, games), traffic analytics for behavioral signals, and posting a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data practices and operator contacts.

What is the primary objective of **POPIA**?

**POPIA’s primary objective is to safeguard personal information against unlawful processing while establishing conditions for lawful processing, providing data subject rights, and ensuring compliance mechanisms.** As per Section 2 of the **Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (Act 4 of 2013)**, it promotes the constitutional right to privacy, balances information flows, and protects both living natural persons and existing juristic persons through eight conditions in Chapter 3.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **POPIA**?

**All Responsible Parties processing personal information in South Africa must comply with POPIA, regardless of size or sector.** This includes public/private entities domiciled in South Africa or processing data of South African data subjects via automated/non-automated means; foreign entities are liable if processing occurs in South Africa. Responsible Parties determine purpose/means; Operators process on their behalf but under Responsible Party accountability (Sections 1, 20–21). No revenue/employee thresholds apply.

Does **POPIA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**POPIA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance relies on self-demonstrated accountability (Section 8), with the **Information Regulator** conducting investigations/enforcement. Responsible Parties must maintain documentation (Section 17), security safeguards (Section 19), and evidence of reasonable measures, including Operator contracts (Sections 20–21); voluntary alignment to frameworks like ISO 27001 supports defensibility.

How often should an assessment for **POPIA** be performed?

**POPIA requires continuous security risk assessments under Section 19(2), with regular verification and updates to safeguards.** Responsible Parties must identify foreseeable risks, establish/verify safeguards, and update for new threats—effectively mandating ongoing cycles (e.g., annual or risk-triggered). **Information Officers** conduct Personal Information Impact Assessments (PIIAs) for high-risk processing; full compliance reviews align with business changes or Regulator guidance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **POPIA**?

**Non-compliance with POPIA incurs administrative fines up to ZAR 10 million (Section 109), criminal penalties including up to 10 years imprisonment (Section 107), and civil damages (Section 99).** The **Information Regulator** considers factors like data nature, breach duration, affected subjects, and preventability; Responsible Parties remain liable for Operator failures, with enforcement notices, processing suspensions, and reputational harm.

Can **POPIA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, POPIA’s principles align closely with GDPR, enabling mapping to its conditions and rights.** POPIA’s eight conditions (e.g., accountability, purpose limitation, security under Section 19) mirror GDPR Articles 5–32; Section 19(3) references “generally accepted information security practices” for frameworks like ISO 27001. Differences include juristic person protection and mandatory **Information Officers**; mappings support integrated programs but require POPIA-specific adaptations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **POPIA**?

**The first step is appointing and registering an Information Officer (IO).** Per POPIA, the head of the Responsible Party is automatically the IO (delegable), responsible for compliance framework, PIIAs, training, DSAR handling, and Regulator liaison. This anchors accountability (Section 8), enabling data inventories, policy development, and Operator governance.

COPPA vs POPIA

Standards Comparison

COPPA

Mandatory

1998

U.S. regulation protecting children's online privacy under 13

POPIA

Mandatory

2013

South African regulation for personal information protection

Quick Verdict

COPPA protects US children under 13 from online data collection via parental consent, while POPIA comprehensively regulates all personal information processing in South Africa with eight conditions and strict accountability. Companies adopt COPPA for US child compliance and POPIA to meet SA legal mandates.

Children Privacy

COPPA

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Mandates verifiable parental consent for children's personal data
Targets child-directed commercial websites, apps, and IoT devices
Broadly defines PII including geolocation and persistent identifiers
Imposes FTC penalties up to $43,792 per violation
Offers safe harbor programs for self-regulatory compliance

Data Privacy

POPIA

Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013 (Act 4 of 2013)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Eight conditions for lawful processing
Protects juristic persons' personal information
Mandatory Information Officer appointment
Continuous security risk management cycle
Data subject rights and breach notification

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

COPPA Details

What It Is

The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), enacted in 1998 and effective April 2000, is a U.S. federal regulation enforced by the FTC. It protects children under 13 from unauthorized online collection of personal information by commercial operators of websites, apps, and IoT devices directed to kids or with actual knowledge of their users' age. COPPA emphasizes parental control through verifiable consent requirements.

Key Components

**Verifiable Parental Consent (VPC)Mandatory via 11+ methods (e.g., credit card, video call) before data collection.
**Privacy PoliciesDetailed notices on data practices.
**Parental RightsAccess, review, deletion, and revocation.
**PII ScopeBroadly includes names, geolocation, device IDs, audio/video.
**Safe HarborsFTC-approved self-regulatory programs like ESRB.

Why Organizations Use It

Compliance avoids crippling FTC fines ($43,792/violation; YouTube $170M). It reduces legal risks, builds parental trust, enhances reputation, and limits data misuse amid heightened enforcement on edtech and gaming.

Implementation Overview

Conduct audience analysis, deploy age gates, implement VPC and security, minimize data collection. Applies globally to U.S.-targeted services; suitable for all operator sizes. Safe harbors involve audits; typical via policy tools and tech solutions.

POPIA Details

What It Is

POPIA (Protection of Personal Information Act, 2013, Act 4 of 2013) is South Africa's comprehensive privacy regulation. It establishes enforceable requirements for processing personal information of natural and juristic persons, using an accountability-based approach with eight conditions for lawful processing.

Key Components

**Eight conditionsAccountability, processing limitation, purpose specification, further processing limitation, information quality, openness, security safeguards, data subject participation.
Overseen by the Information Regulator; includes data subject rights (access, correction, objection) and breach notification.
Built on GDPR-aligned principles but includes juristic persons; mandatory Information Officer role; no certification but regulatory enforcement.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal compliance to avoid fines up to ZAR 10 million and imprisonment.
Enhances risk management, trust, and operational efficiency via data minimization and security.
Builds stakeholder confidence; strategic for multinationals with SA operations.

Implementation Overview

**Phased approachGap analysis, data mapping, governance, controls, training.
Applies universally to SA-domiciled or SA-processing entities; focuses on programs over audits.

Key Differences

Aspect	COPPA	POPIA
Scope	Children under 13 online privacy	All personal info of natural/juristic persons
Industry	Commercial websites/apps targeting US kids	All sectors in South Africa
Nature	US federal law, FTC enforced	South African statute, Regulator enforced
Testing	Safe harbor audits, parental consent verification	Security measures verification, DPIAs
Penalties	$43,792 per violation, FTC fines	ZAR 10M fines, imprisonment possible

Scope

COPPA

Children under 13 online privacy

POPIA

All personal info of natural/juristic persons

Industry

COPPA

Commercial websites/apps targeting US kids

POPIA

All sectors in South Africa

Nature

COPPA

US federal law, FTC enforced

POPIA

South African statute, Regulator enforced

Testing

COPPA

Safe harbor audits, parental consent verification

POPIA

Security measures verification, DPIAs

Penalties

COPPA

$43,792 per violation, FTC fines

POPIA

ZAR 10M fines, imprisonment possible

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about COPPA and POPIA

COPPA FAQ

POPIA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

Prove CIS Controls v8.1 effectiveness with KPI catalog, evidence checklist & reporting cadence. Ideal for board reports, audits & cyber-insurance. Measure outco

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs Six Sigma

CSL vs Six Sigma: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law with Six Sigma strategies for compliance mastery, risk mitigation, and turning regulations into strategic advantages now!

UL Certification vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

UL Certification vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Safety marks & factory audits meet AI governance & PDCA. Compare risks, scopes, benefits for compliance edge. Discover now!

K-PIPA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

Compare K-PIPA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Strict Korean consent & breach rules meet U.S. rapid disclosure mandates. Key diffs, strategies for global compliance. Dive in!

COPPA

POPIA

Quick Verdict

COPPA

Key Features

POPIA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

COPPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

POPIA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

COPPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of COPPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with COPPA?

Does COPPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for COPPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with COPPA?

Can COPPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing COPPA?

POPIA FAQ

What is the primary objective of POPIA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with POPIA?

Does POPIA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for POPIA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with POPIA?

Can POPIA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing POPIA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Proving CIS Controls v8.1 Works: A KPI & Evidence Framework for Board Reporting, Audits, and Continuous Assurance

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs Six Sigma

UL Certification vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023

K-PIPA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules