COPPA
U.S. regulation requiring parental consent for children's online data
REACH
EU regulation for chemicals registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction
Quick Verdict
COPPA protects children's online privacy under 13 via parental consent, while REACH mandates chemical risk management through registration and restrictions. Companies adopt COPPA for US child-directed services to avoid massive FTC fines; REACH for EU market access to prevent market bans.
COPPA
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Key Features
- Mandates verifiable parental consent before data collection
- Protects children under 13 from online tracking
- Expansive PII definition includes device IDs, geolocation
- Imposes up to $43,792 civil penalties per violation
- Applies extraterritorially to U.S.-targeting services globally
REACH
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)
Key Features
- Registration required for substances over 1 tonne/year
- Authorisation for SVHCs with sunset dates
- Restrictions via Annex XVII for unacceptable risks
- Supply chain SDS and SVHC communication duties
- Industry-led chemical safety assessments and dossiers
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
COPPA Details
What It Is
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) is a U.S. federal regulation enacted in 1998, effective 2000, enforced by the FTC. It targets operators of commercial websites, apps, and services collecting data from children under 13, mandating verifiable parental consent (VPC). Scope includes child-directed content or known child users; approach emphasizes parental control and data minimization.
Key Components
- Core obligations: privacy notices, VPC mechanisms (11+ methods like credit cards), parental access/review/deletion rights, data security.
- Expansive PII (10+ categories: names, geolocation, persistent IDs, audio/video).
- Built on principles of limited collection and safe harbors (e.g., ESRB, iKeepSafe).
- No formal certification; compliance via self-regulation or FTC audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal mandate avoids $43,792/violation penalties (e.g., YouTube's $170M fine). Reduces breach risks, builds parental trust, enables global operations targeting U.S. kids. Enhances reputation in edtech, gaming; mitigates enforcement by FTC/state AGs.
Implementation Overview
Assess child-directed status, deploy age gates/VPC, post policies, minimize data. Applies to all sizes/industries collecting kids' data, U.S./global. Key activities: audits, third-party reviews, ongoing monitoring. No certification but safe harbor participation recommended. (178 words)
REACH Details
What It Is
REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation governing the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals. Its primary purpose is to ensure a high level of protection for human health and the environment from chemical risks by shifting responsibility to industry for generating and managing safety data. Scope covers substances, mixtures, and certain articles across the supply chain; it uses a risk-based approach with tonnage-triggered obligations.
Key Components
- Four pillars: Registration (>1 tonne/year dossiers), Evaluation (dossier/substance checks), Authorisation (SVHCs on Annex XIV), Restriction (Annex XVII bans/limits).
- 17 technical annexes define data requirements, SDS rules, lists.
- Built on industry-led data generation, ECHA coordination, national enforcement.
- Continuous compliance model, no certification but mandatory registration.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal obligation for EU manufacturers/importers to avoid market bans, fines.
- Manages supply chain risks, ensures market access.
- Drives substitution, innovation; builds stakeholder trust via transparency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, inventory, dossiers, monitoring.
- Applies to chemical/product firms EU-wide; complex for globals.
- No certification; ECHA submissions, national audits required. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | COPPA | REACH |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Children's online personal data collection under 13 | Chemical substances registration, risks, restrictions EU-wide |
| Industry | Online services, apps, websites targeting children globally | Chemicals, manufacturing, importers across all sectors EU/EEA |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal law enforced by FTC | Mandatory EU regulation enforced by ECHA/Member States |
| Testing | Parental consent verification, age screening, data security | Hazard testing, chemical safety assessments by tonnage bands |
| Penalties | $43,792 per violation, e.g. YouTube $170M fine | Effective, proportionate dissuasive fines by Member States |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about COPPA and REACH
COPPA FAQ
REACH FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp
From Data Fragments to Strategic Insight: Powering Intelligent Risk Management with Integrated Compliance Monitoring
Transform data fragments into strategic insights with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time risk management, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 compliance, and
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9120B vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
AS9120B vs MLPS 2.0: Compare aerospace distributor QMS with China's cybersecurity scheme. Master key differences for compliance, risk mgmt & global ops. Dive in!
NIS2 vs SOX
NIS2 vs SOX: EU cyber directive expands to essential entities with 2% turnover fines vs US SOX's ICFR audits & exec certifications. Compare scopes—boost compliance now!
POPIA vs EU AI Act
Discover POPIA vs EU AI Act: Compare SA's privacy law & EU's AI rules on scope, rights, security & fines. Key insights for global compliance. Act now!