CSA
Canadian standards for OHS management and hazard assessment
ISO 27017
Code of practice for cloud-specific security controls
Quick Verdict
CSA provides safety management and software assurance for industries like manufacturing and life sciences, while ISO 27017 offers cloud-specific security controls within ISO 27001 ISMS. Companies adopt CSA for compliance and risk reduction; ISO 27017 for cloud provider trust and shared responsibility clarity.
CSA
CSA Z1000 Occupational Health and Safety Management
Key Features
- Consensus-based development with SCC accreditation oversight
- PDCA management system framework via CSA Z1000
- Hazard classification across six categories per Z1002
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizing elimination-engineering
- Worker participation integrated in hazard assessments
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Code of practice for cloud controls
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Adds 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
- Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 cloud adaptations
- Addresses multi-tenancy segregation and VM hardening
- Enables customer monitoring of cloud service activities
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CSA Details
What It Is
CSA Z1000 and Z1002 are Canadian Standards Association (CSA Group) consensus standards for occupational health and safety (OHS). Z1000 provides a PDCA-based OHS management system (OHSMS) framework; Z1002 focuses on hazard identification, risk assessment, and control. Voluntary initially, they become mandatory via regulatory incorporation-by-reference. Scope covers worker safety across industries like manufacturing, construction, energy.
Key Components
- Leadership/policy, planning (hazards/risks/objectives), implementation (training/controls/emergency prep), checking (audits/incidents), management review (Z1000).
- Hazard categories (biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychosocial, safety); risk prioritization by severity/likelihood/exposure; hierarchy of controls (Z1002). Built on evidence-based consensus; SCC-accredited; 5-year review cycles.
Why Organizations Use It
Meets legal due diligence; demonstrates reasonable precautions in enforcement/courts; reduces incidents/liability. Enables continual improvement, worker participation, certification. Builds trust with regulators, insurers; supports market access/procurement.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy integration, training, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries; high-risk sectors prioritized. CSA Group offers training/certification; internal audits plus optional third-party verification. (178 words)
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice providing cloud-specific guidance for information security controls within an ISO 27001 ISMS. It extends ISO/IEC 27002 for cloud environments, using a risk-based approach to address shared responsibilities between cloud service providers (CSPs) and customers (CSCs).
Key Components
- Additional implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls tailored to cloud
- 7 new CLD cloud-specific controls covering responsibility delineation, multi-tenancy segregation, VM hardening, admin operations, monitoring, and asset removal
- Builds on ISO 27001; assessed during ISO 27001 audits, not standalone certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Clarifies CSP-CSC responsibilities to reduce cloud risk gaps
- Meets procurement demands and supports regulations like GDPR
- Builds customer trust and competitive edge for CSPs
- Enhances overall ISMS maturity and audit efficiency
Implementation Overview
- Integrate via risk assessment into existing ISO 27001 ISMS
- Key steps: control mapping, cloud configurations, shared responsibility matrices, joint audits
- Applicable globally to CSPs/CSCs of all sizes; 9-12 months typical for joint certification
Key Differences
| Aspect | CSA | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | OHS management, hazard ID, software assurance | Cloud-specific info sec controls |
| Industry | Safety, manufacturing, life sciences, global | Cloud providers/customers, IT/tech, global |
| Nature | Standards/guidance, voluntary certification | Code of practice, voluntary ISMS extension |
| Testing | Audits, surveillance, certification bodies | ISO 27001 audits with cloud controls |
| Penalties | Certification loss, legal fines if mandated | No direct penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CSA and ISO 27017
CSA FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Singapore PDPA Implementation Guide: Mastering Part 6A Breach Notification Thresholds and Timelines from Primary Statute
Master Singapore PDPA Part 6A breach notifications: statutory thresholds (risk of significant harm), 72-hour timelines, checklists, templates & frameworks. Comp

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
POPIA vs Basel III
Explore POPIA vs Basel III: Unpack SA privacy law vs global bank capital standards. Master compliance overlaps for finance pros handling data & risk. Optimize now!
ISO 14001 vs Basel III
ISO 14001 vs Basel III: Contrast EMS for sustainability with banking capital/liquidity rules. Discover compliance strategies, risk management & certification insights now!
COBIT vs J-SOX
Discover COBIT vs J-SOX: IT governance powerhouse meets Japan SOX financial controls. Optimize compliance, align IT-business goals, cut risks—find your best framework now!