What is the primary objective of **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The primary objective of CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) is to establish a nationwide framework for securing information systems, protecting **Critical Information Infrastructure (CII)**, and enforcing data localization for network operators and data processors in China.** Enacted on **June 1, 2017**, its 69 articles focus on three pillars: **network security** (technical safeguards, testing, monitoring), **data localization** (storing CII and important data in Mainland China with assessments for cross-border transfers), and **cybersecurity governance** (executive accountability, incident reporting).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

****CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) mandates compliance for all **network operators**, **CII operators**, data processors of **important data**, and foreign enterprises serving Chinese users.** This includes cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud), SaaS vendors, IoT manufacturers, e-commerce sites handling large-scale personal data, and any entity with a digital footprint in China via subsidiaries, apps, or customers—regardless of server location.

Does **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) requires external security evaluations and certifications for CII operators, including submission of **Security Protection Capability Test (SPCT)** reports to MIIT and **China Information Security Certification (CISC)** where applicable.** **Article 20** mandates penetration testing and vulnerability scanning; CII entities must use government-approved testing agencies for attestations, with alignment to ongoing audits.

How often should an assessment for **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be performed?

**CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) assessments must be conducted periodically, with security testing required under **Article 20**, annual compliance reporting, and re-assessments within 60 days of regulatory amendments.** Continuous monitoring via SIEM and KPIs (e.g., Mean Time to Detect) is mandatory, alongside quarterly training, incident drills, and alignment with MIIT updates for CII and important data.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**Non-compliance with CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) results in fines up to **5% of annual revenue** (per 2022 amendment), business license suspension, service shutdowns, and operational disruptions.** Additional risks include data seizure, reputational damage, and lawsuits under PIPL, as seen in a CNY 150 million fine for data localization failure.

An **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) can be mapped to international frameworks like **ISO 27001** (Annex A controls to CSL articles) and **NIST** for governance and technical controls.** Phase 3 implementation aligns policies (e.g., incident response) and Phase 4 uses shared audit schedules for CISC and ISO 27001 certification.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The first step to implement CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) is **Phase 0: Pre-Engagement & Stakeholder Alignment**, securing executive sponsorship, forming a cross-functional steering committee, and mapping regulatory baselines.** This produces a governance charter and **CSL Gap Report** via asset inventory, policy review, and risk scoring to prioritize remediation.

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to define quality management system requirements for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations to ensure consistent conformity to customer and regulatory requirements.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure (Clauses 4-10), embedding aerospace-specific controls for configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, product safety, human factors, traceability, preservation, and operational risk-based thinking (Clauses 6.1, 8.1.1). This supports continuing airworthiness, risk mitigation, and customer satisfaction in safety-critical MRO environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to MRO organizations performing maintenance on commercial, private, and military aircraft, including repair stations and OEM MRO divisions.** It targets entities needing to demonstrate QMS capability for aviation regulators (e.g., FAA/EASA Part-145 alignment), customer contracts, or IAQG OASIS listing. While voluntary, it is often contractually mandated by airlines, OEMs, and primes for supply-chain approval, regardless of organization size.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited registrars following a two-stage external audit process.** Stage 1 reviews documentation and readiness; Stage 2 verifies effective implementation via on-site evidence of processes like internal audits and management reviews. Certification is listed on IAQG OASIS, with surveillance audits annually and recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**Internal assessments (audits) for AS9110C must be performed at planned intervals based on process risk, with full cycles completed before certification.** Registrars require the QMS to operate for at least three months, including internal audits and one management review, prior to external audit. Ongoing: risk-based frequency (e.g., quarterly for critical maintenance processes), plus annual surveillance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks regulatory sanctions, contract loss, and operational shutdowns in MRO contexts.** It can lead to FAA/EASA Part-145 certificate suspension, fines (e.g., up to $100k/day), OEM delisting from OASIS, liquidated damages, litigation from airworthiness failures, and AOG events costing millions in downtime and rework.

An **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C directly maps to ISO 9001:2015 via its shared Annex SL high-level structure and terminology (e.g., documented information, external providers).** IAQG provides correlation matrices aligning clauses to regulatory frameworks like EASA/FAA Part-145, enabling integrated QMS without duplication.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step for AS9110C implementation is a formal gap analysis mapping existing processes to all clauses, including regulatory alignments.** Conduct clause-by-clause review using IAQG matrices, prioritizing high-risk gaps (e.g., configuration management, counterfeit prevention) to produce a prioritized register and phased project SOW with executive sponsorship.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Mandatory

N/A

China's regulation for cybersecurity, data localization, governance

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft maintenance organizations

Quick Verdict

CSL mandates cybersecurity and data localization for China operations, while AS9110C certifies quality management for aviation MRO. Companies adopt CSL for legal compliance in China; AS9110C for market access and safety in aerospace.

Standard

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Mandatory data localization for CII and important data
Security assessments for cross-border data transfers
Senior executive cybersecurity responsibilities required
Real-time network monitoring and periodic testing
Incident reporting within 24 hours mandated

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Risk-based thinking embedded in planning and operations
Configuration management and traceability controls
Counterfeit parts prevention and detection processes
Maintenance release and airworthiness verification
Human factors integration in competence and audits

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

What It Is

Enacted on June 1, 2017, the Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL) is a nationwide statutory regulation governing network operators, data processors, and entities handling Chinese data. It sets baseline requirements for securing information systems, emphasizing network security, data protection, and governance. CSL adopts a pillar-based, risk-oriented approach with state oversight.

Key Components

Three pillars: Network Security (safeguards, monitoring), Data Localization & PIP (local storage, transfer assessments), Cybersecurity Governance (executive duties, reporting).
69 articles covering CII operators, important data, and broad network operators.
Built on mandatory protections, assessments, and cooperation with authorities like MIIT.
Compliance through self-assessments, government evaluations, and audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for China-touching entities to avoid fines up to 5% annual revenue, shutdowns, lawsuits.
Builds trust with consumers, partners; enables market access.
Drives efficiency via modern tech (ZTA, SOAR), innovation (local R&D).
Mitigates operational, reputational risks; aligns with PIPL, DSL.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, redesign (local clouds, SIEM, IAM), governance, testing.
Targets MNCs, cloud/SaaS providers, CII operators in China.
Involves training, vendor management, continuous monitoring; MIIT certifications for CII.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) and PDCA approach to ensure airworthiness and compliance.

Key Components

Core clauses (4-10) covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, release controls.
Built on Annex SL structure; requires documented information, not rigid procedures.
Certification via accredited registrars with internal audits and management reviews.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA Part-145).
Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework/AOG events.
Enhances market access, operational efficiency, supplier confidence.
Builds stakeholder trust through proven QMS maturity.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, pilot, rollout, certification.
Involves training, eQMS adoption, internal audits (3+ months operational data).
Targets MROs globally; scalable by size; 6-12 months typical.