Standards Comparison

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's law mandating cybersecurity for network operators and data

    VS

    GLBA

    Mandatory
    1999

    U.S. law for financial privacy notices and data safeguards

    Quick Verdict

    CSL mandates data localization and network security for China operations, while GLBA requires privacy notices and safeguards for US financial NPI. Companies adopt CSL for Chinese market access, GLBA for US compliance and consumer trust.

    Standard

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates data localization for CII and important data
    • Requires security assessments for cross-border transfers
    • Imposes executive cybersecurity accountability
    • Enforces real-time network monitoring and testing
    • Demands 24-hour incident reporting to authorities
    Financial Privacy

    GLBA

    Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
    • Comprehensive written information security program
    • Qualified Individual designation and board reporting
    • Breach notification within 30 days for 500+ consumers
    • Service provider oversight and risk assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

    What It Is

    The Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted on June 1, 2017, is a nationwide statutory regulation comprising 69 articles. It governs network operators, service providers, and data processors within Chinese jurisdiction, focusing on securing information systems. CSL uses a pillar-based approach emphasizing mandatory technical safeguards, data protection, and governance.

    Key Components

    • Three core pillars: Network Security (safeguards, testing, monitoring), Data Localization & Personal Information Protection (local storage for CII and important data), Cybersecurity Governance (executive duties, incident reporting).
    • Classifies entities like CII operators and requires cooperation with authorities.
    • Compliance via self-assessments, government evaluations, and certifications like CISC.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Avoids severe penalties (fines up to 5% annual revenue), disruptions, reputational harm.
    • Builds trust with Chinese consumers and partners, enhances efficiency through modern architectures like zero-trust.
    • Enables innovation via local R&D, regulatory sandboxes; manages legal risks under intersecting laws like PIPL, DSL.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased framework: gap analysis, architectural redesign (local clouds, SM cryptography), governance, testing.
    • Applies to domestic/foreign entities serving China, across industries.
    • Involves audits, training, continuous monitoring for CII operators.

    GLBA Details

    What It Is

    The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal statute enacted in 1999. It is a regulation establishing baseline protections for consumer financial privacy and data security. Its primary purpose is to require financial institutions to provide transparency on information-sharing practices and implement safeguards for nonpublic personal information (NPI). GLBA employs a risk-based approach through its Privacy Rule and Safeguards Rule.

    Key Components

    • **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Mandates initial/annual notices and opt-out rights for nonaffiliated third-party sharing.
    • **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Requires a written information security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards; includes ~9 core elements like risk assessments and Qualified Individual designation.
    • **Pretexting provisionsProhibits obtaining NPI under false pretenses. Compliance is enforced by FTC for non-banks; no formal certification but ongoing audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal compliance to avoid FTC penalties up to $100,000 per violation.
    • Risk mitigation against breaches and enforcement (e.g., Equifax cases).
    • Builds customer trust and competitive edge in financial services.
    • Enhances governance and vendor oversight.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping, risk assessment, policy development, technical controls, testing. Applies to broad financial institutions (banks, fintech, tax firms); U.S.-focused; requires annual board reporting and breach notification for 500+ consumers.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Network security, data localization, governance
    GLBA
    Privacy notices, safeguards for NPI

    Industry

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    All network operators in China
    GLBA
    Financial institutions, non-banks (US)

    Nature

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Mandatory nationwide law
    GLBA
    Mandatory federal regulations (FTC)

    Testing

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Penetration testing, SPCT for CII
    GLBA
    Vulnerability scans, annual pen tests

    Penalties

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    5% annual revenue fines
    GLBA
    $100K per violation fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) and GLBA

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) FAQ

    GLBA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages