Standards Comparison

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's statutory framework for cybersecurity and data localization

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    CSL mandates cybersecurity and data localization for China operations, while ISO 13485 provides voluntary QMS certification for medical devices. Companies adopt CSL for legal compliance in China; ISO 13485 for global market access and regulatory readiness.

    Standard

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates data localization for CII and important data
    • Requires technical safeguards and real-time network monitoring
    • Assigns cybersecurity responsibilities to senior executives
    • Enforces 24-hour incident reporting to authorities
    • Imposes fines up to 5% of annual revenue
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based QMS for medical device lifecycle
    • Documented processes and traceability requirements
    • Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
    • Supplier evaluation and outsourcing controls
    • Design validation and process verification

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

    What It Is

    The Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted on June 1, 2017, is a nationwide statutory regulation comprising 69 articles. It governs network operators, service providers, and data processors in Chinese jurisdiction, focusing on securing information systems. Its risk-based approach emphasizes three pillars: network security, data localization, and cybersecurity governance.

    Key Components

    • **Three core pillarsNetwork security (safeguards, testing, monitoring); Data localization and PIP for CII and important data; Cybersecurity governance (executive accountability, incident reporting).
    • Applies to network operators, CII operators, data processors, and foreign entities serving Chinese users.
    • Built on mandatory compliance model with cooperation to authorities; no formal certification but requires assessments.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for compliance to avoid fines up to 5% of revenue, operational shutdowns, and reputational damage. Provides strategic benefits like consumer trust, operational efficiency via microservices, and innovation through local R&D. Enhances risk management and market leadership in China.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased **GRC frameworkGap analysis, architectural redesign (local clouds, ZTA, SIEM), organizational controls (policies, training), and continuous testing. Targets multinational corporations, cloud/SaaS providers with Chinese exposure; involves audits and MIIT evaluations.

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016, titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is an international certification standard for QMS in medical device organizations. It employs a risk-based approach to ensure consistent provision of safe devices meeting customer and regulatory needs across the device lifecycle.

    Key Components

    • Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation, management responsibility, resources, product realization, measurement/improvement.
    • Emphasizes documented procedures, traceability, validation, risk management (linked to ISO 14971), and post-market surveillance.
    • Requires quality manual, medical device files, supplier controls, CAPA, and internal audits.
    • Certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), reduces risks/recalls.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, supplier assurance, and operational efficiency.
    • Demonstrates regulatory maturity for partnerships and scaling.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, documentation, validation, audits, certification.
    • Suits manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally; 9–36 months typical.
    • Involves cross-functional teams, eQMS tools, training; ongoing management reviews.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Network security, data localization, cybersecurity governance
    ISO 13485
    Medical device QMS across lifecycle stages

    Industry

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    All network operators in China jurisdiction
    ISO 13485
    Medical devices and related services globally

    Nature

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Mandatory national law with fines
    ISO 13485
    Voluntary certification standard for regulators

    Testing

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Periodic security testing, government assessments
    ISO 13485
    Internal audits, process validation, certification audits

    Penalties

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Fines up to 5% annual revenue, shutdowns
    ISO 13485
    Loss of certification, regulatory non-conformance

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) and ISO 13485

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages