Standards Comparison

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Mandatory
    N/A

    China's regulation for network security and data localization

    VS

    ISO 19600

    Voluntary
    2014

    International guidelines for compliance management systems

    Quick Verdict

    CSL mandates cybersecurity for China operations with data localization and fines up to 5% revenue, while ISO 19600 offers voluntary CMS guidelines for global compliance risk management. Companies adopt CSL for legal survival in China; ISO 19600 for strategic governance.

    Standard

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

    Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates data localization for CII and important data
    • Requires security assessments for cross-border transfers
    • Assigns cybersecurity responsibilities to senior executives
    • Enforces real-time monitoring and 24-hour incident reporting
    • Applies broadly to all network operators serving China
    Compliance Management

    ISO 19600

    ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based compliance management framework
    • Principles of good governance and proportionality
    • PDCA cycle for continuous improvement
    • Scalable for all organization sizes and sectors
    • Integrates with existing management systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

    What It Is

    The Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted June 1, 2017, is a nationwide statutory regulation. It governs network operators, data processors, and entities handling Chinese data. Primary purpose: secure information systems, protect national security. Scope covers all with Chinese digital footprint. Adopts pillar-based approach: technical safeguards, data rules, governance.

    Key Components

    • Three pillars: Network Security (safeguards, testing, monitoring); Data Localization & PIP (local storage for CII, assessments); Cybersecurity Governance (executive duties, reporting).
    • 69 articles; heightened for CII operators.
    • Core principles: classification, localization, cooperation.
    • Compliance via self-assessments, MIIT evaluations, certifications like CISC.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Avoids fines up to 5% revenue, disruptions, lawsuits.
    • Builds trust, loyalty in privacy-aware market.
    • Enables efficiency (microservices, SOAR), innovation (R&D labs).
    • Manages risks, gains B2B preference, competitive edge.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: alignment, gap analysis, redesign (local clouds, ZTA, SIEM), governance, testing.
    • For network operators, CII, foreign firms with China users.
    • Key activities: asset classification, training, audits, continuous monitoring.

    ISO 19600 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines — is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The risk-based approach applies universally across organization sizes, sectors, and geographies, using Annex SL structure with 10 clauses.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • **Principlesgood governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
    • PDCA cycle for continual improvement.
    • No fixed controls; scalable guidance, non-certifiable.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates regulatory penalties, operational risks, reputational damage.
    • Enhances decision-making, efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access.
    • Builds integrity culture, future-proofs for ISO 37301.
    • Demonstrates governance to stakeholders.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, improvement.
    • Involves risk registers, policies, training, audits.
    • Applicable to all sizes/industries; voluntary benchmarking, no certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 19600
    Compliance management systems, risk-based obligations

    Industry

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 19600
    All industries, sectors, organization sizes globally

    Nature

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 19600
    Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable framework

    Testing

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 19600
    Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessments

    Penalties

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)
    Not specified
    ISO 19600
    No legal penalties, internal governance risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) and ISO 19600

    CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) FAQ

    ISO 19600 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages