What is the primary objective of **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The primary objective of CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) is to establish a nationwide statutory framework governing network security, data localization, and cybersecurity governance for all entities processing data in Chinese jurisdiction.** Enacted on **June 1, 2017**, with 69 articles, CSL mandates technical safeguards like firewalls and real-time monitoring (**network security** pillar), storage of **Critical Information Infrastructure (CII)** and **important data** in Mainland China (**data localization & PIP** pillar), and senior executive accountability with incident reporting (**cybersecurity governance** pillar). It applies to **network operators** including cloud platforms, SaaS, and IoT.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**All network operators, CII operators, data processors of important data, and foreign enterprises serving Chinese users must comply with CSL.** This includes entities owning networks serving the public (**e.g., Alibaba Cloud**), those whose systems impact national security or economy (**CII**, like power grids), processors of large-scale personal or **State Council-designated important data** (**e.g., JD.com**), and foreign services (**e.g., Microsoft 365**) with Chinese users or subsidiaries.

Does **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**CSL requires security assessments and government-approved evaluations for CII operators, including third-party penetration testing and Security Protection Capability Test (SPCT) reports to MIIT, but no universal external certification.** **Article 20** mandates periodic testing; CII entities submit SPCT via certified agencies. **China Information Security Certification (CISC)** applies where specified.

How often should an assessment for **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be performed?

**CSL-mandated assessments, including penetration testing and vulnerability scanning for CII assets, must be conducted periodically per Article 20, with re-assessments triggered within 60 days of regulatory amendments.** Annual compliance reporting and continuous monitoring via SIEM are standard; incident response drills align with the **24-hour reporting window** (**Article 31**).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**Non-compliance with CSL incurs fines up to 5% of annual revenue (2022 amendment), business license suspension, service shutdowns, and reputational damage.** Examples include a 2020 CNY 150 million fine for data non-localization and operational blocks for cloud providers.

An **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CSL can be mapped to international frameworks through shared controls like data localization, incident reporting, and governance.** Align **Article 21** (network security) with ISO 27001 Annex A; CII protections with NIST; however, CSL's data residency mandates require custom adaptations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)**?

**The first step is Phase 0 Pre-Engagement: secure executive sponsorship, form a cross-functional steering committee, and conduct regulatory baseline mapping of applicable CSL articles.** Produce a **CSL Gap Report** via asset inventory, policy review, and risk scoring to prioritize remediation.

What is the primary objective of **TOGAF**?

**TOGAF's primary objective is to provide a proven, vendor-neutral methodology and framework for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise architecture to improve business efficiency.** It establishes consistent standards, methods, and communication among architecture professionals, avoids proprietary lock-in, and enables reuse through the **Enterprise Continuum** and **Architecture Repository**, aligning strategy with IT execution via the iterative **Architecture Development Method (ADM)**.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **TOGAF**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with TOGAF, as it is a voluntary, vendor-neutral standard developed by The Open Group.** Professionally, it is adopted by leading enterprises, government agencies, and regulated sectors like finance and defense undertaking large-scale IT modernization, where certified architects (via TOGAF Foundation and Practitioner credentials) apply it to ensure coherence across business, data, application, and technology domains.

Does **TOGAF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**TOGAF does not require external audits or third-party certification for organizations implementing it.** Compliance is managed internally through the **Architecture Capability Framework**, including **Architecture Board** reviews, **Architecture Contracts**, and phase-specific assessments in the **ADM** (e.g., Phase G: Implementation Governance), with optional practitioner certification from The Open Group to standardize skills.

How often should an assessment for **TOGAF** be performed?

**TOGAF assessments should be performed continuously through iterative ADM cycles, with formal reviews in Phase H (Architecture Change Management) triggered by business changes.** Maturity assessments using the **Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM)** occur initially in the **Preliminary Phase** and periodically (e.g., quarterly for active programs, annually for enterprise-wide), ensuring alignment via **Requirements Management** as an ongoing discipline.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **TOGAF**?

**Non-compliance with TOGAF results in no formal penalties, as it is a voluntary framework, but leads to internal risks like fragmented architectures, duplicated efforts, vendor lock-in, and failed transformations.** Organizations face higher costs, integration issues, and poor ROI without **ADM** governance, **Content Framework** traceability, or **Enterprise Continuum** reuse, undermining strategic alignment and agility.

An **TOGAF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, TOGAF can be mapped to other frameworks through its modular structure and guidance in the 10th Edition.** The **Content Metamodel** and **ADM Techniques** support integration with complementary standards, using the **Enterprise Continuum** for alignment, while **Series Guides** provide configuration patterns for joint operating models without altering core TOGAF elements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **TOGAF**?

**The first step to implement TOGAF is the Preliminary Phase, establishing architecture capability by defining principles, tailoring the framework, and setting up governance.** This includes forming an **Architecture Board**, initiating a **Request for Architecture Work**, selecting tools for the **Architecture Repository**, and conducting a maturity assessment to scope subsequent **ADM** iterations.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs TOGAF

Standards Comparison

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Mandatory

N/A

China's national law for network security and data localization

TOGAF

Voluntary

2022

Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture methodology.

Quick Verdict

CSL mandates cybersecurity for China operations with data localization and fines, while TOGAF provides voluntary enterprise architecture methodology for global strategy alignment. Companies adopt CSL for legal compliance in China; TOGAF for efficient IT-business transformation.

Standard

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China)

Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Enterprise Architecture

TOGAF

TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM)
Content Framework and Metamodel for artifacts
Enterprise Continuum for asset reuse
Reference Models like TRM and III-RM
Architecture Capability Framework for governance

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) Details

What It Is

Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL), enacted June 1, 2017, is a nationwide statutory regulation governing network security, data handling, and cybersecurity for entities in Chinese jurisdiction. It establishes a baseline framework with 69 articles focused on protecting networks, localizing data, and ensuring governance. Its risk-based approach mandates safeguards based on asset classification like Critical Information Infrastructure (CII).

Key Components

Three pillars: network security (safeguards, testing), data localization (CII/important data in China), cybersecurity governance (executive duties, reporting).
Broad applicability to network operators, CII operators, data processors.
Compliance model requires assessments, audits, and cooperation with authorities like MIIT; no formal certification but government evaluations for CII.

Why Organizations Use It

CSL drives legal compliance to avoid fines up to 5% revenue, operational disruptions. It builds consumer trust, enables efficiency via modern architectures, fosters innovation through local R&D. Enhances risk management and market access in China.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, architectural redesign (local data centers, ZTA), governance setup, testing. Applies to any organization serving Chinese users; demands significant resources, training, audits for ongoing compliance.

TOGAF Details

What It Is

TOGAF® Standard (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. Its primary purpose is to design, plan, implement, and govern enterprise-wide change across business and IT. The key methodology is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring for various contexts.

Key Components

Core pillars: ADM (10 phases including Preliminary, Vision, Business/Data/Application/Technology Architectures, Migration, Governance, Change Management).
Content Framework (deliverables, artifacts, building blocks; Content Metamodel).
Enterprise Continuum, Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM), Architecture Capability Framework.
No fixed controls; certification via Open Group paths.

Why Organizations Use It

Aligns strategy with execution, reduces duplication, accelerates delivery via reuse.
Improves governance, risk management, ROI; avoids vendor lock-in.
Builds stakeholder trust through consistent standards and communication.

Implementation Overview

Phased rollout: Preparation, Assessment, Target Design, Pilot, Scale, Continuous Improvement.
Applies to large enterprises across industries; voluntary adoption with tailoring.