Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    COBIT

    Voluntary
    2019

    Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance firms via risk management and TLPT, while COBIT offers voluntary IT governance framework for all enterprises. Finance adopts DORA for compliance; others use COBIT to align IT with business goals and manage risks.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Requires management-overseen ICT risk management frameworks
    • Enforces 4-hour major incident reporting timelines
    • Mandates triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT providers (CTPPs)
    • Applies proportionality to entity size and risk
    IT Governance

    COBIT

    COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Tailored governance via 11 design factors and workflow
    • 40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
    • CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance management
    • Goals cascade linking stakeholder needs to practices
    • 7 components including processes, culture, and skills

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is a transformative EU regulation bolstering ICT resilience in finance against disruptions like cyberattacks. Applicable from January 17, 2025, it targets 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs), using a risk-based, proportional approach to harmonize rules across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk ManagementComprehensive frameworks with vulnerability controls and annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour alerts, 72-hour updates for major events (>5% users or €100k loss).
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual scans, triennial TLPT.
    • **Third-Party OversightContractual due diligence, ESA supervision of CTPPs. Built on proactive principles; compliance via reporting, penalties up to 2% turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU financial firms, DORA mitigates systemic risks, addresses third-party vulnerabilities (e.g., CrowdStrike), enhances trust, and spurs €10-15B investments. It evolves fragmented guidelines into unified resilience, reducing cyber threats (74% firms hit by ransomware).

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses per RTS/ITS, develop policies/tools, perform tests. Proportional for size/complexity; targets ~22,000 entities. Involves training, multi-vendor strategies; regulatory oversight, no formal certification.

    COBIT Details

    What It Is

    COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology, is a comprehensive governance and management framework developed by ISACA. It focuses on enterprise I&T governance (EGIT), translating stakeholder needs into actionable objectives via a tailoring-based design approach using design factors and goals cascade.

    Key Components

    • 40 governance and management objectives grouped into **5 domainsEDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance).
    • 6 governance system principles and 7 components (processes, structures, culture, etc.).
    • CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5).
    • No formal certification; compliance via capability assessments and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns I&T with business value, manages risk, optimizes resources.
    • Supports regulatory alignment (SOX, GDPR) and assurance.
    • Enhances decision-making, digital transformation, stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phased design workflowassess gaps, tailor via 11 design factors, pilot objectives, measure capabilities.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; requires training (ISACA certs), change management.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    COBIT
    Enterprise IT governance and management

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial sector only
    COBIT
    All industries worldwide

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    COBIT
    Voluntary governance framework

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT
    COBIT
    Capability assessments 0-5 levels

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    COBIT
    No legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and COBIT

    DORA FAQ

    COBIT FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages