Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    ENERGY STAR

    Voluntary
    1992

    U.S. voluntary program for energy-efficient products and buildings

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms against cyber threats, while ENERGY STAR voluntarily certifies energy-efficient products and buildings. Financial entities adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; manufacturers and owners pursue ENERGY STAR for cost savings and market differentiation.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Establishes comprehensive ICT risk management overseen by management body
    • Mandates 4-hour initial reporting for major incidents
    • Requires triennial threat-led penetration testing for critical entities
    • Directly oversees critical third-party ICT providers via ESAs
    • Applies proportionality based on entity size and risk profile
    Energy Efficiency

    ENERGY STAR

    ENERGY STAR

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Third-party certification and verification testing
    • Category-specific performance thresholds
    • Portfolio Manager benchmarking scores
    • Strict ENERGY STAR brand governance
    • Ongoing post-market surveillance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation mandating ICT risk management for financial entities against disruptions like cyberattacks. It covers 20 financial types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs), using a risk-based, proportional approach with full application from January 17, 2025.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk ManagementIdentification, protection, detection, response, recovery frameworks with annual reviews.
    • **Incident ReportingLog, classify, notify within 4/72 hours and 1 month for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual vulnerability scans, triennial TLPT for critical functions.
    • **Third-Party OversightContractual clauses, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs. No formal certification; compliance via RTS/ITS and fines up to 2% turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for EU financial compliance, mitigates cyber risks (74% ransomware hit rate), prevents systemic failures like CrowdStrike outage, builds trust, drives cybersecurity investments amid rising threats.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses per ESAs RTS, develop policies/tools, run tests, manage vendors. Applies EU-wide to all sizes with proportionality; smaller entities prioritize basics. Involves training, simulations, ongoing reporting/audits toward 2025 deadline.

    ENERGY STAR Details

    What It Is

    ENERGY STAR is a U.S. EPA-administered voluntary labeling and benchmarking program established in 1992. It serves as a certification framework for superior energy performance across products, homes, commercial buildings, and industrial plants. Its source-energy-based methodology differentiates top-tier efficiency using standardized tests and peer-relative scores.

    Key Components

    • Performance thresholds (e.g., 15% above federal minima for appliances; 75+ score for buildings)
    • Third-party certification via EPA-recognized labs and bodies
    • Portfolio Manager for benchmarking
    • Ongoing verification testing (5-20% of models annually)
    • Brand governance with strict mark usage rules Certification requires independent validation and annual renewal for buildings.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces energy costs ($500B saved since inception), emissions (4B metric tons avoided), and unlocks incentives/rebates. Builds trust via credible labeling (90% consumer recognition), enhances market differentiation, and supports ESG goals. Mitigates regulatory risks from benchmarking laws.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: assess/gap analysis (4-8 weeks), design/testing/certification (3-12 months), deployment, ongoing monitoring. Applies to manufacturers, building owners across sectors; U.S./Canada focus. Mandatory third-party verification; scalable for portfolios.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    ENERGY STAR
    Energy efficiency across products/buildings

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial sector only
    ENERGY STAR
    All industries, US-focused

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    ENERGY STAR
    Voluntary certification program

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic/TLPT every 3 years
    ENERGY STAR
    Third-party certification/verification testing

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    ENERGY STAR
    Certification revocation, no fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and ENERGY STAR

    DORA FAQ

    ENERGY STAR FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages