DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
FedRAMP
U.S. program standardizing federal cloud security assessments
Quick Verdict
DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms with testing and reporting, while FedRAMP authorizes secure cloud services for US federal agencies via NIST controls and 3PAO audits. EU firms comply to avoid fines; US vendors pursue contracts.
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Harmonizes ICT resilience across 27 EU member states
- Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
- Enforces 4-hour major incident reporting timelines
- Requires triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
- Oversees critical third-party ICT service providers
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program
Key Features
- NIST 800-53 controls at Low/Moderate/High impact levels
- Third-party assessments by accredited 3PAOs
- Continuous monitoring with monthly/annual reporting
- Assess once, use many times reusability model
- FedRAMP Marketplace listing for visibility
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation harmonizing ICT risk management and resilience for the financial sector. It targets 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs) against disruptions like cyberattacks, using a proportionality-based, risk-centric approach.
Key Components
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial, 72-hour updates for major incidents.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual scans, triennial TLPT for critical functions.
- **Third-Party OversightContracts, monitoring, ESA supervision of CTPPs. Supported by RTS/ITS standards from ESAs.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for ~22,000 EU entities to avoid 2% turnover fines. Bolsters resilience amid 74% ransomware exposure, enhances systemic stability, builds trust, spurs cybersecurity innovation.
Implementation Overview
Gap analysis, framework builds, testing programs, vendor due diligence. Applies EU-wide to all sizes with proportionality; full enforcement January 17, 2025. Supervisory audits required, no formal certification.
FedRAMP Details
What It Is
FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) is a U.S. government-wide framework standardizing security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud services used by federal agencies. Its primary purpose is enabling "assess once, use many times" to reduce duplication, based on risk-based NIST SP 800-53 controls tailored to FIPS 199 impact levels (Low, Moderate, High).
Key Components
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 baselines: ~156 (Low), ~323 (Moderate), ~410 (High) controls.
- Core artifacts: SSP, SAR, POA&M, continuous monitoring plans.
- 3PAO independent assessments; FedRAMP Marketplace for reusability.
- Built on FISMA; compliance via Agency or Program authorizations.
Why Organizations Use It
- Unlocks federal contracts ($20M+ potential); CMMC mandates for DoD.
- Enhances risk management, competitive edge as trust badge.
- Builds stakeholder confidence for commercial sales.
Implementation Overview
- 12-18 month process: categorization, documentation, 3PAO assessment, authorization.
- Targets CSPs; suits all sizes pursuing federal business; requires audits, ongoing monitoring.
Key Differences
| Aspect | DORA | FedRAMP |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Digital resilience in finance | Cloud security for federal agencies |
| Industry | EU financial entities only | US federal cloud providers |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation | Standardized US authorization program |
| Testing | Annual basic, triennial TLPT | 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover | Revocation, contract loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about DORA and FedRAMP
DORA FAQ
FedRAMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo
Your Guide to Implementing PCI DSS in Your Organization
Step-by-step guide to implementing PCI DSS in your organization. Achieve compliance, protect cardholder data, and reduce risks. Start securing payments today!
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPL vs FISMA
Compare PIPL vs FISMA: China's GDPR-like privacy law vs US federal security framework. Unlock compliance strategies, risks, and global data tips. Navigate both now.
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs COBIT
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs COBIT: Unlock compliant electronic records governance. Align risk-based controls, audit trails & signatures for FDA-regulated IT. Boost integrity now!
ISO 27018 vs ISO 30301
ISO 27018 vs ISO 30301: Cloud PII privacy code augments 27001 vs certifiable records MSR for governance. Key diffs, benefits for compliance. Choose right now!