Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    GRI

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global standards for sustainability impact reporting.

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial firms via risk management and testing, while GRI offers voluntary global sustainability reporting on material impacts. Firms adopt DORA for regulatory compliance; GRI for stakeholder transparency and strategic ESG benchmarking.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes ICT resilience rules across 27 EU states
    • Mandates management-overseen ICT risk management frameworks
    • Imposes 4-hour initial major incident reporting
    • Requires triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
    • Enforces direct oversight of critical third-party providers
    Sustainability Reporting

    GRI

    GRI Standards

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Impact-based materiality assessment process
    • Modular Universal, Sector, Topic Standards
    • Mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability
    • Broad worker scope including contractors
    • Supply chain environmental and OHS disclosures

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU regulation bolstering ICT resilience in finance against disruptions like cyberattacks. It targets 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs), employing a risk-based, proportional approach harmonized across 27 member states.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk ManagementFrameworks for risk identification, protection, detection, response, recovery, integrated with business strategy.
    • **Incident ReportingLog, classify, report major incidents (e.g., >5% users affected) in 4 hours initially, 72 hours intermediate, 1-month root-cause.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic ICT tests; triennial TLPT for critical functions.
    • **Third-Party OversightContractual clauses, monitoring, ESAs supervision of CTPPs via JETs. Enforced with fines up to 2% global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legal mandate prevents penalties; mitigates systemic risks (74% ransomware incidents); enhances cyber resilience post-CrowdStrike; builds trust; drives cybersecurity investments (€10-15B EU-wide).

    Implementation Overview

    Gap analysis against RTS/ITS; develop policies, testing plans, vendor management. Applies to ~22,000 EU entities proportionally by size/complexity. Ongoing audits, full compliance by January 17, 2025.

    GRI Details

    What It Is

    GRI Standards (Global Reporting Initiative) are a modular framework for sustainability reporting. They enable organizations to disclose significant impacts on economy, environment, and people using an impact-centric materiality approach, prioritizing actual and potential effects over financial materiality alone.

    Key Components

    • Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation, GRI 2: General Disclosures, GRI 3: Material Topics): Baseline requirements, principles (accuracy, balance, verifiability), and materiality process.
    • **Sector StandardsHigh-impact sector-specific topics.
    • **Topic StandardsDetailed disclosures (e.g., GRI 403 Occupational Health & Safety). Compliance via "in accordance" claims and mandatory GRI Content Index; no certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD interoperability).
    • Enhanced stakeholder trust, benchmarking, risk management.
    • Strategic ESG integration, investor appeal via GRI-SASB complementarity.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: governance setup, materiality assessment, data systems, reporting. Applies globally to all sizes/industries; assurance recommended for credibility.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    ICT risk management, resilience testing, third-party oversight in finance
    GRI
    Sustainability impacts on economy, environment, people via topic standards

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and critical ICT providers
    GRI
    All industries worldwide, any organization size

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation with enforcement
    GRI
    Voluntary global reporting framework

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical entities
    GRI
    Materiality assessments, internal/external audits for verifiability

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    GRI
    No legal penalties, reputational risks only

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and GRI

    DORA FAQ

    GRI FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages