Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    IEC 62443

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for IACS cybersecurity.

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU finance against cyber threats via testing and reporting, while IEC 62443 provides voluntary OT cybersecurity framework with zones, levels for industries globally. Firms adopt DORA for compliance, IEC 62443 for robust IACS protection.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
    • Requires 4-hour initial reporting of major ICT incidents
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT service providers (CTPPs)
    • Harmonizes resilience standards across 27 EU member states
    Industrial Cybersecurity

    IEC 62443

    IEC 62443: IACS Security Standards Series

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Zones and conduits risk-based segmentation
    • Security Levels SL-T, SL-C, SL-A triad
    • Shared responsibility for stakeholders
    • Seven Foundational Requirements FR1-7
    • ISASecure modular certifications

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulatory framework enacted on December 14, 2022, fully applying from January 17, 2025. It targets digital operational resilience for 20 financial entity types—like banks, insurers, and crypto providers—plus critical ICT third-party providers (CTPPs). DORA uses a risk-based, proportional approach to counter ICT disruptions including cyberattacks and system failures.

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksStrategies for risk identification, mitigation, and annual reviews overseen by management.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour initial alerts, 72-hour updates, and 1-month root-cause analysis for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests plus triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, contractual clauses, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Compliance model involves reporting to authorities, with fines up to 2% of global turnover.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for ~22,000 EU entities amid rising threats (74% ransomware hit). Delivers unified standards, systemic risk reduction, enhanced trust, and cybersecurity innovation, as seen in CrowdStrike impacts.

    Implementation Overview

    Gap analyses, framework builds, testing programs, vendor mapping. Applies EU-wide to varied sizes; leverages EBA precedents for larges. Key: pre-2025 readiness via RTS/ITS batches.

    IEC 62443 Details

    What It Is

    IEC 62443 (ISA/IEC 62443 series) is an international consensus-based standards framework for cybersecurity of Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). It provides a comprehensive, risk-based approach spanning governance, risk assessment, system architecture, and product development for OT environments, addressing unique constraints like safety, availability, and long lifecycles.

    Key Components

    • Four groupings: General (-1), Policies (-2), System (-3), Components (-4).
    • Seven Foundational Requirements (FR1-7); ~140 component requirements.
    • Zones/conduits segmentation, Security Levels (SL 0-4).
    • ISASecure certifications (SDLA, CSA, SSA) for modular conformance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates OT cyber risks, ensures safety/reliability.
    • Meets regulatory references (e.g., NIS-2, NERC CIP alignments).
    • Enables secure procurement, supply chain assurance.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via certified maturity (ML1-4).

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: governance (2-1), risk assessment (3-2), controls (3-3/4-2), certification.
    • Applies to asset owners, integrators, suppliers across industries/geographies.
    • Involves CSMS setup, SL-T setting, audits; multi-year for full maturity.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience for ICT risks
    IEC 62443
    Cybersecurity for industrial automation systems

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial sector entities
    IEC 62443
    Industrial sectors worldwide (OT/IACS)

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    IEC 62443
    Voluntary consensus standard

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT
    IEC 62443
    Risk-based SL assessments, certifications

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    IEC 62443
    No legal penalties, certification loss

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and IEC 62443

    DORA FAQ

    IEC 62443 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages