Standards Comparison

    DORA

    Mandatory
    2023

    EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector

    VS

    ISO 20000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for service management systems

    Quick Verdict

    DORA mandates ICT resilience for EU financial entities via risk management and testing, while ISO 20000 offers voluntary certification for service management excellence across industries. Firms adopt DORA for compliance, ISO 20000 for operational trust and market edge.

    Digital Operational Resilience

    DORA

    Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandates comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
    • Requires 4-hour incident reporting for major disruptions
    • Enforces triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT)
    • Oversees critical third-party ICT providers (CTPPs)
    • Harmonizes resilience rules across 27 EU states
    IT Service Management

    ISO 20000

    ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management system requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Annex SL structure for management system integration
    • End-to-end service lifecycle operational processes
    • PDCA-driven continual improvement requirements
    • Certifiable SMS with third-party audits
    • Multi-supplier lifecycle control and governance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    DORA Details

    What It Is

    Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), formally Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation enhancing digital resilience of financial entities against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks and system failures. Applicable from January 17, 2025, it adopts a risk-based, proactive approach to harmonize rules across 27 member states, covering 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs).

    Key Components

    • **ICT Risk Management FrameworksIdentification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
    • **Incident Reporting4-hour notifications, 72-hour updates for major incidents.
    • **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial TLPT for critical entities.
    • **Third-Party OversightDue diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision of CTPPs. Built on proportionality principle; enforced via RTS/ITS standards, no formal certification but authority audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal mandate avoids fines up to 2% global turnover.
    • Mitigates systemic risks (74% firms hit by ransomware).
    • Boosts resilience, stakeholder trust, and cross-border efficiency.
    • Drives cybersecurity investments amid threats like CrowdStrike outage.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analyses against ESAs RTS; develop frameworks, testing plans, vendor contracts. Tailored by entity size/complexity; key for EU financial sector. Preparation since 2023 involves training, tools, and simulations, with oversight fees up to €1M for CTPPs. (178 words)

    ISO 20000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the international certification standard for a service management system (SMS). It specifies requirements to plan, implement, operate, and improve services across their lifecycle, using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with Annex SL.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Clause 8 domains: service portfolio, relationships/agreements, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution/fulfilment, assurance.
    • Core processes: incident/problem management, change/release, configuration/asset, availability/continuity, security.
    • Third-party certifiable via audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Drives service reliability, efficiency, risk reduction.
    • Meets customer demands, enables procurement wins.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, market differentiation.
    • Integrates with ISO 9001, ISO 27001.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, design, deployment, audits (12-18 months typical).
    • Suits all sizes/industries; requires leadership, training, tooling.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    DORA
    Digital operational resilience in finance
    ISO 20000
    Service management systems across industries

    Industry

    DORA
    EU financial entities and CTPPs
    ISO 20000
    All service providers globally

    Nature

    DORA
    Mandatory EU regulation
    ISO 20000
    Voluntary certification standard

    Testing

    DORA
    Annual basic, triennial TLPT
    ISO 20000
    Internal audits, management reviews

    Penalties

    DORA
    Up to 2% global turnover fines
    ISO 20000
    Loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about DORA and ISO 20000

    DORA FAQ

    ISO 20000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages